Another Group Deserving of Shame
We know about the feminists themselves, in their rich and varied shadings. Likewise, we know about the male supporters of feminism—those whom we bluntly call collaborationists, by historical analogy with World War Two.
But the group I am discussing today has so far kept clear of the hostile scrutiny it richly deserves. I won't list names, but rather highlight their unique qualities in a way that would call their presence to the attention of others, and encourage some awareness of the role such people play, or might potentially play, in the thickening plot developments of the gender crisis.
These people—these MALES I should say—have escaped the radar mainly because they show no sign of any friendly feeling toward feminism. If anything, the contrary. They are on the whole what you might call "traditional males"; politically, I would peg them as possibly neoconservative, or libertarian with neoconservative leanings.
What sets these men apart is their arrogant conventionalism, and their proclivity toward the customary alpha dominance games which, according to feminist propaganda, characterize men as a group. To say that these men lack male political consciousness is altogether too much of a kindness. In fact, they are flat-out rude, snide, callous and pig-headed when confronted by any honest description of the objective conditions that weigh upon men as men. According to them, any speech of this kind is the mark of a "wimp".
Therefore, such males are worse than useless to the men's movement. They believe they can make their way in the world—to achieve money, power, status, promotion, expensive cars and other such crucial necessities—despite every damn thing which has operated to poison the world against men in the last forty years. Oh no, none of it makes a chicken-feed worth of difference to them; suck it up, they say! Male political consciousness is only a character flaw, a lame excuse to be a pathetic loser. If you are rugged and square-shouldered, you can plow your furrow to the top of the mountain no matter what—and no excuses mister! Male solidarity? Brotherhood? That's just a load of worthless whining, you little drip!
These elitist cowboys are no help at all. They are not our brothers! They are wretched curs who would rather betray us to a common enemy than modify their traditional manly narratives and self-conceptualizations. Their presence on earth is like a 50-pound bag of buckshot around our necks! Every time the bar gets raised, their eternal answer is "jump a little higher!" Admirable tough guys, aren't they? Oddly enough, the feminists don't like such men any more than we do, for they are very much the "patriarchalists" of caricatured legend! And yet what a friend they are to feminism after all! Supremely ironic, yes? Finally, they shall be served according to their merit.
Since I like to invent names for things, I believe I will call these people SCABS. That word has a nice wicked "bite" to it... don't you think?
I am open to better suggestions. Perhaps later I will think of one myself....
Post Note: The original name that occurred to me was "cowboys", but I think "scabs" is better!