More Things to Kindle Your WRATH Against Feminism!!
The following is from Falsely-Accused.Net, the website of Dr. Demosthenes Lorandos, a clinical psychologist and lawyer rolled into one who specializes in defending men who have been falsely accused of rape, sexual abuse, or similar. Dr. Lorandos is based in Ann Arbor, Michigan.
"In many states, the judge now informs the jury that:
(1) an allegation of rape does not require any evidence of corroboration;
(2) there is no requirement for medical evidence;
(3) there is no requirement for DNA evidence; and
(4) there is no requirement for a second witness."
"In short, there the only requirement for a conviction is the bare allegation made by a complainant. Even the manner in which the jury is selected is tainted with this attitude that evidence does not matter. In many states, prosecutors can demand that during the selection process, each prospective juror must agree that he/she would not require corroboration of a crime. If the juror disagrees with this demand, he/she can be excused. . . ."
Go to Dr. Lorandos's website to read the rest of the article, here:
http://www.falsely-accused.net/rape-cases.php
And when you are done with that, you will be in the perfect mood to read THIS again.
And remember that the feminists don't give one goddamn spit in a windstorm if such horrible things happen to YOU, my friend!
"Rape Cases & False Accusationsis no longer allowed to be given as a result of changes in the law; changes that also mandate giving a very different set of instructions.
"Rape is a criminal allegation that is easy to claim and increasingly difficult for a defendant to disprove. For decades, the crime of rape has been known as the easiest criminal allegation to make by the alleged victim and the hardest to disprove by the defendant.
"In the 1960s, the victims of this brutal crime were able to take advantage of significant changes in the law that made it easier to obtain convictions and justice. Unfortunately, these changes also made it easier for those who were falsely accused of rape to be convicted as well. Adding to the defendant’s difficulties is the controversial “Rape Trauma Syndrome,” a psychological theory that has been rejected by behavioral science. Unfortunately, this idea is still being used by prosecutors and junk science witnesses as so-called evidence in cases alleging the crime of rape.
"A series of biased laws are making it easier to obtain convictions.
"Jury Instructions
"Courts have long known that rape is an easy allegation to make but one that is hard to disprove. In fact, the biggest threat of being falsely accused of a crime was that of being accused of rape (until child molestation became a significant national issue, flooding the legal system with cases). Courts perceived the potential threat of false allegations of rape and fashioned jury instructions to inform members of the jury that such allegations were easy to make by the complainant but difficult for the defendant to disprove.
"Today, in most states, this jury instruction [ To wit: Hale's warning!]
"In many states, the judge now informs the jury that:
(1) an allegation of rape does not require any evidence of corroboration;
(2) there is no requirement for medical evidence;
(3) there is no requirement for DNA evidence; and
(4) there is no requirement for a second witness."
"In short, there the only requirement for a conviction is the bare allegation made by a complainant. Even the manner in which the jury is selected is tainted with this attitude that evidence does not matter. In many states, prosecutors can demand that during the selection process, each prospective juror must agree that he/she would not require corroboration of a crime. If the juror disagrees with this demand, he/she can be excused. . . ."
Go to Dr. Lorandos's website to read the rest of the article, here:
http://www.falsely-accused.net/rape-cases.php
And when you are done with that, you will be in the perfect mood to read THIS again.
And remember that the feminists don't give one goddamn spit in a windstorm if such horrible things happen to YOU, my friend!
posted by Fidelbogen at 11:26 PM
8 Comments:
They are doing exactly as they said they would,a man accused of rape is now guilty till proved innocent.The cost of any defence will be horrendous,bearing in mind that what the police had to do to get a conviction in the old days the defendant will now have to pay for to attempt to be proved innocent,as usual in this country-POOR=GUILTY.There is only 1 alternative and that's very risky-
have nothing to do with women and do not be alone with one,cheaper to get a hypnotist to render you gay.
Trying to extract the silver lining from the cloud here: Maybe things will just have to get worse before they get better, to bring the pot to a boil, to bring matters to an extreme pitch of crisis where "something's got to give."
So where's the silver lining? Well, I see it in this: Feminism's days of extreme, smug, self-justificatory arrogance may be drawing to a close as it becomes harder and harder for feminists (hence women in general) to occupy any kind of moral high ground, or to compete creditably in the "Suffering Olympics".
These things will become more and more obvious to more and more people, and the feminists will need to budget more and more energy toward rationalization and spin-control exercises - as their world becomes more and more schizoid and mired in various forms of denial and doublespeak.
Eventually, this will take a serious toll upon them, and their universe will begin to implode.
Feminism's perpetual revolution will start to reverse itself as it generates blocking energy against itself.
Wish I could share your enthusiasm.
Seems to me we are deeper into Gynarchy every single day.Perhaps
one day women will get fed up of small fry and start going after the ones they should have gone after in the first place,the rich and famous and those in power.
Do I sound enthusiastic? Sorry, didn't mean to parade on your rain! ;-)
Actually, I think there is a long, slow, weary journey ahead of us. Yes, a lot of things seem to be getting worse. Deeper into Gynarchy every day, as you have said.
However, I also see counter-trends and counter-signs. . .
Meaning, that it is possible for things to be going both forward and backward simultaneously. "It was the best of times, it was the worst of times. . ."
For example, everything suggests to me that the the men's movement is growing steadily and unstoppably...and that the other side is aware of this and starting to worry about it. (Just monitor the things they are talking about, and the WAY they are talking about them. The MRA message is beginning to penetrate - although they are still trying to act haughty and cavalier about it all!)
And once again, as I said in my previous comment, things may need to get worse before they get better - so, let things slide deeper and deeper into gynarchy until it hits the brick wall of natural limitations with a horrendous crash! At that point, all the MRA groundbreaking and preparatory work will start to pay off in a big way as "our side" quickly starts taking control of the (by then) out of control situation.
"(1) an allegation of rape does not require any evidence of corroboration;
(2) there is no requirement for medical evidence;
(3) there is no requirement for DNA evidence; and
(4) there is no requirement for a second witness."
"In short, there the only requirement for a conviction is the bare allegation made by a complainant. "
In this correct? How does this even make sense in our legal system? If this is accurate, then the previously mentioned 'guilty until proven innocent' wouldn't even apply, more fitting would be guilty once accused. If the alleged victim need not provide any witness, proof or evidence then surely there is little point in even holding a trial. If these are indeed the criteria for proving rape (which basically means no criteria) then there's much more wrong with our legal system then I had supposed. I'm going to have to look into this further.
Kim: It does NOT "make sense in our legal system", basically because it is a breach of our legal system by a system of alien logic. (Can you say "collective guilt"?)
Think about the implications, and the possible ramifications, and your head will begin to wobble. Yes, that is what the world is coming to! :(
(If you haven't already, take a look at a recent post of mine called "What me worry? About Rape?"
Scroll down a bit and you'll see it.)
I'm assuming you're in the USA - your accent sounds American. But similar things are happening internationally. When you have time, google on "warren blackwell". (And that's just the tip of the iceberg!)
You may have noticed that these judicial rules don't yet apply in all jurisdictions - however, they are very, very widespread. It's pretty much a state by state thing, with some states being notably worse than others.
And of course, the jury still has discretion. And many juries are exercising this discretion responsibly by NOT returning a guilty verdict - which makes the feminists very unhappy: "Men are getting away with rape," they say. "We need to get more convictions!!" And so they are keeping up the political pressure for changes that will make rape convictions more likely to occur.
Of course, I just can't help injecting my 2 cents about the Duke lacrosse case! Good thing those boys were rich, and the case was so much in the public eye! That's mainly why the case fell apart - because it was open to the disinfecting sunlight of the world's gaze! And the fact that the plaintiff's case was patently a crock o' shit helped quite a bit also!
It's simply astounding that Mike Nifong thought he could get away with it. But that fact alone screams volumes: He thought he could get away with it! Of course this time he made a huge miscalculation and overreached himself, but the fact remains that he thought he could get away with it! He was sure that he could get away with it; he was arrogantly certain of it - so much so, that he put himself recklessly far out on a limb, and that limb SNAPPED!
I'm afraid that Michael Nifong is no rare bird in the prosecutorial systems of America: The rot has spread far and deep! Judges are plenty rotten too, from what I hear!
And the feminist political machine has done quite a lot to encourage this state of affairs. (Google up "emily's list", or: "david usher", "emily's list".)
(Although I don't want to pin ALL the blame on feminism: such things as the war on drugs and the war on terror have played a mighty big role as well! But they're all strands in the same cloth...)
Anyway...the ironic thing is that major indicators (such as the National Crime Victimization Survey) strongly suggest that the incidence of rape is actually declining!
Go figure. . .
You can discern accent on the net? Very impressive fidelbogen. :o) You are correct, I am in the U.S.. I think I'm both blessed and challenged by the fact that I've grown up and live in a conservative area, where feminists are about as abundant as liberals. Most women I know want nothing more than to be a good wife and mother (most of our moms actually taught us how to bake bread and pies and such). It's also part of my religions, we actually have monthly meetings where we collectively work on being better wives and mothers. The men I know still hold open doors and think women are, by and large, great. Perhaps this is why, despite the fact I went to college and lived in a non-conservative environment for several years, am still shocked to think these kind of injustices can even exist.
"You can discern accent on the net? Very impressive fidelbogen. :o)
Yes indeed, I have spent enough time conversing online with Brit MRAs that I can tell an English from an American "accent" - even on my computer screen! ;-)
"Perhaps this is why, despite the fact I went to college and lived in a non-conservative environment for several years, am still shocked to think these kind of injustices can even exist".
It seems to me that people from such regions as yours would be a POWERFUL political force if their consciousness got massively raised re: "these kind of injustices".
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home