Lucia Vega makes it clear that she has no use for "the men's movement". On the face of the evidence, having examined her above-linked blog post, I must conclude that Lucia Vega has no profound understanding of the subject.
The core premise of the men's rights movement is that male life has value. But Lucia Vega is silent upon this point.
Yes or no: Would Lucia Vega agree that male life has value?
Yes or no: Would Lucia Vega agree that MY male life has value?
Yes or no: Would Lucia Vega agree that the right of due process and equal protection under the law belongs to ALL citizens?
Yes or no: Would Lucia Vega approve of the three items on the following list?:
1. Defamation of character
2. False Accusation
3. Robbery under color of law
Since I can find no evidence in the above-linked blog post that would indicate the contrary, I shall assume as a matter of course that Lucia Vega would answer these questions in the following sequence: Yes, yes, yes, yes. And I would assume the very same of ANY person who would criticize the movement in such an asinine way as Lucia Vega has done.
If Lucia Vega has anything to say for herself, she'd better get over to CF right quick and submit to cross-examination.
My patience with these people wears seriously thin, and I don't believe in "suffering fools gladly"- or not this late in the day! I'll leave that job to Jesus Christ.