Wednesday, January 31, 2007

For Feminist Readers: An Introduction to the Men's Movement

I compose this article for the enlightenment of feminist readers. Yes, I know you folks are out there, amongst the upwards of 60 million visitors who troop through here daily! I said I would throw you some scraps, but guess what? I think you deserve more than that, because I think you folks are special! So, chef Fidelbogen has cooked a full-course, sit-down meal for you guys, complete with all the fixin's!

So let's dig in! The most important thing to understand about the men's movement is that it is a cross-section of humanity. This means that what humanity in its wide variety encompasses, the men's movement likewise encompasses. It is like extracting a drop of water from a pond—stick this drop under a microscope and it will look identical to any other. The drop contains the pond in microcosm. So too, the men's movement contains the human race. By that I mean that it contains the moral spectrum of human nature. The whole damned enchilada! The saints, the scoundrels, and everything in between—in the same proportions you will likely encounter along the common roads of life.

Let us consider more closely the demographic spectrum which the men's movement encompasses. Men as a group are on the receiving end of feminist political fallout, therefore it is men as a group who are reacting to this fallout. And their reaction covers an enormously complex gamut of behaviors.

Pay close heed to the following: not all of this behavior is politically conscious, and not all of it is admirable, rational or morally defensible. Men are simply reacting to the objective conditions that weigh upon them. Lashing out, you would say—or in some cases caving in. Over the years, feminist activism has injected into the world a variety of innovations which have wrought to the disadvantage of male citizens, either directly or indirectly. And I don't mean "loss of privilege"; I mean veritable objective injury in an absolute sense! Do you think the "R" in MRA stands for privilege? Think of this as input to a system—a system called "men". What presently concerns us is the output which has occurred in consequence.

The feminist input to the male social ecology can justifiably be described as 'poison'. And poison, in whatever form it occurs, is a school for dysfunctional behavior. What else could it be? People who have been poisoned don't typically behave well, do they? At the very least, they will show signs of sickness. Possibly it is only bad manners. Or then again, perhaps it takes a more dangerous turn. But either way, you know that something has gotten into them.

The input into the system called 'men' has been poison. And the output from this system has likewise been . . . poison.

Poison in, poison out.

When you systematically stir up hate toward a targeted population, and systematically enact laws and policies that could deprive this targeted population of wealth, health, happiness, security, a good name and other needful things, then you can expect this targeted population to "act out" in various ways, in token of its displeasure.

Now the targeted population in this case amounts to half the human race, and that is no trifle. On the contrary, it is significant and should be treated as such. For one thing, the numbers are formidable. For another, the nature of what has been wrought introduces tortuous complexities into the world—like opening a can of hellworms.

Poison in, poison out.

The gamut of male reaction corresponds to the variety of human types encompassed by the category men. Every man will act out according to his individual nature. However, take note: the pressures bearing down upon men will have a cumulative warping effect. Specifically, such pressures will warp men en masse in a misogynistic direction. Men who are just a shade misogynistic to begin with will predictably become more so, but what's concerning is that even men who are NOT misogynistic are apt to become just a shade so.

Call this the misogynistic shift. It occurs chiefly because, given the objective circumstances within their own lights, men will rationally find less reason to think well of women. Women, for their own part, merely display their imperfect human nature because, under the weight of moral challenge most of them fall short of heroic insight. They are soft, they are venal, they are naive, they are lazy, they are sheep-like, they are shortsighted, they are self-deceiving—simply put, neither better nor worse than men. But here, their human weakness makes them fall short in a manner that just happens to be male-detrimental. And men, particularly those whose lights afford them no better insight, take this unkindly.

Poison in, poison out.

However, not only have we got the misogynistic shift to deal with, but as originally stated we must also confront a variety of human types behaving in the many ways that human types naturally behave—which in the varied course of things is not always admirable, rational, morally defensible or politically conscious! Yes, a full spectrum of men reacting in a full spectrum of human ways to a pattern of damaging pressures applied toward men as a group. Here it is needful to understand, that without the initial action or input, the reactive behaviors would not be happening!

Think about that. Without the initial action or input, the reactive behaviors would not be happening!

Poison in, poison out.

A few years ago, the feminist thought-leader Germaine Greer made the following statement in a newspaper article:
"A kind of mad squeamishness prevents us from quantifying the nuisance value of maleness, possibly because if you actually tell men that they are damned nuisances, they are likely to behave even worse."
Germaine Greer is bang on the money, for when you treat men the way Greer treats them in this statement, look out! One way or another, you'll get what you deserve. When you abuse people, they are likely to behave even worse. Surprise, surprise!

Poison in, poison out.

I should add the obvious, that two can play at this game. Gender-sliming is a two-way street, and plenty of men have made their case, eloquently and plausibly, that women likewise are damned nuisances.

Yet there is something else, greater than the obvious, which I would draw to your attention. It is this: that even if the vile things feminists say about men were a little bit true, or possibly quite a bit true, it would do no damage to the case I am building. There is no law against being that abstractly phrased thing called a "damned nuisance" and nobody, not even a damned nuisance, enjoys being trodden on! If you make the world unhealthy or unprofitable for half of the human species, I guarantee that your policy will turn around and BITE YOU ON THE ASS! Yes, that is how the world works, and if you don't believe me just try it and learn for yourself! Oh yes, we'll see who's a bloody nuisance all right! I am a quiet, laid-back person. A soft-spoken person. But I am no pacifist. So please don't force me to be the the kind of person you say I am!

Poison in, poison out.

In the end, it comes to this: male-bashing is not a wise idea. It is a lose-lose game any way you play it; a fool's game in fact, and bound to have fool's consequences. If male-bashing continues, look out! Trouble ahead! One way or another, across the board, men are in motion. There's a foul wind blowing, and this is understandably setting them astir. You ought to be concerned; not on their account, but on your own! Given certain inputs, and given the archetypal patterns that hold sway within the realm of human occurrence, it may be predicted, on a statistical order of probability, that certain outputs will obtain.

Poison in, poison out.

The purpose of my counter-feminist agency is to analyze, inform, advise, and PREDICT. I make no threats, and I prescribe no toxic outcomes. I merely PREDICT what is likely to occur if certain policies and trajectories continue unabated. Others are free to believe or disbelieve whatever I might tell them; it is surely no task of mine to force their conscience one way or the other.

Men, as I have noted, are in a state of agitation owing to the toxic social conditions that feminist activism has been instrumental in generating. This agitation takes many forms, much of it ostensively linked to proximate causes only, with the connection to feminism not clearly seen. Indirect agencies are at work, which means that within the social ecology the larger workings of the domino chain are easily discounted or overlooked. But proximate causes have proximate causes of their own, and all of it trickles downhill from the points of input to the system.

And what happens when you input poison to a system? You know what I'm going to say: It poisons the entire system! And what happens when you shove people into a box? You know perfectly well what happens: They come out boxing! The scary part is that a lot of them are boxing blindly, and that means you had best stand clear! Considering how much smoke and dirt they've taken in their eyes, they don't always rightly know what they're pummeling!

No, their behavior isn't always admirable, rational, morally defensible or politically conscious! The cross-section of humanity encompasses both men who have been rendered monstrous by horrendous suffering, and men who were admittedly never sterling critters in the first place! But it's an ugly deal whichever way you cut it.

Poison in, poison out!

Oh yes, that reminds me: It is unspeakable folly to pipe the poison which flows from the output back into the input again. This adds injury to insult, and insult to injury, and ratchets up the cycle of political violence by effectively blaming the collective victim, meaning "men". It is exactly like provoking somebody into hitting you, and then using that action as "evidence" against them. Feminism accumulates more bad karma this way than by any other means. What goes around comes around, and you guys are storing up a power of trouble for yourselves. Stop that! For your own sake!

Poison in, poison out!

Very well, I have given you the avian overview of a male population in motion—truly a men's movement! Not all of this movement is politically conscious, but all of it is symptomatic of a malady, and continued application of the evils which brought about this malady will serve only to prolong and multiply the the trouble for all concerned.

I turn now to the question of expectations—what your side may expect, and what shall be expected of it. My purpose here is not to argue or debate. It is to inform—specifically to inform you of things that you would profit greatly from knowing. I purpose only to exhibit the objective state of present reality to feminist readers, so that the more intelligent among them will be guided in their thinking along lines which I have chosen.

The men's movement is large. It numbers easily in the millions, especially if you factor in the many who are (as of yet) barely conscious of the movement's existence, who operate in isolation, and want only the right spark to awaken them into a full-blown political consciousness. Yes, the sleeping dragon is big, and it sprawls clear across the planet. That is worth thinking about.

You must understand also, that the men's movement is here for the duration. It will not go away. Moreover, if present evils persist, the movement will grow—stronger, larger, more intellectually sophisticated, more robustly integrated. The movement has naught to lose, and nowhere to go but up. Obstacles will pose no deterrent; it will flow over, around, or under any sort of roadblock it encounters. If temporarily held in check, the movement will gather force like water behind a dam.

Sitting on the men's movement and squashing it will be to no avail. Hammer it into what form you wish—it will keep growing. Slander it, and it will spread. Leverage the power of the state against it, and it will intensify. Preach against it, and its charisma will climb the scale.

But then again, perhaps you are thinking that if you "chill out" and freeze the status quo exactly where it now stands without rocking the boat unnecessarily, then it will be possible to preserve the feminist hegemony in a holding pattern, with its subjugatory apparatus largely intact.

That would be a mistaken hope, for it ignores feminism's inherently unstable character. Feminism, you see, is a perpetual revolution, and the nature of such a beast is to remain in motion, perpetually changing, perpetually posing new difficulties, perpetually churning up new dramas while it bores indefatigably into the future. In a certain sense, feminism has no existence separable from its disruption of what surrounds it. It is merely a force, like a dust-devil, and you cannot freeze a dust-devil; it will not hold a pose. And so it is with feminism. It is in vain to suppose that by some combination of consolidating your gains and not antagonizing the men's movement needlessly, feminism will stay in the saddle and things will stay the same indefinitely. This would be futile because it is not the nature of a perpetual revolution to settle down, ever.

If feminism ever "freezes", it will collapse and its power will evaporate. Feminism is not simply in motion, it IS motion!

Having understood the foregoing, you will see how it diminishes your options. In fact it leaves you only one choice: to keep moving and growing ad infinitum, in order to keep existing.

So, if feminism wants to keep existing, it must continue to plough its customary furrow into the future, like an entropic vector that spreads degradation and poison into the social ecology, like a sinner who cannot let go of his sin without ceasing to be a sinner. That is how feminism has always operated. However, note my choice of words. This time I didn't say "male social ecology". I said just plain social ecology.

Yes, there is a male social ecology. Likewise, there is a female social ecology. But prior to both there is a social ecology plain and simple, a big round one that encompasses men and women alike from all directions and flows back and forth between them. Face it: men and women live on the same planet, their physiologies are overwhelmingly the same, they drink the same water and breathe the same air, they are indispensable to each other as a species, and their well-being is mutually interwoven—nay, fused as one—in a multitude of ways that we needn't ever hope to exhaustively catalogue .

Feminists love to trumpet the idea that women are the "ecological" sex, the ones who embody the virtues of relatedness, connectedness, interdependence, intuition, holistic feeling, pre-rationality, communalism, pacifism and the like. I'll omit "women" from the discussion here, but I cannot miss the monumental irony that there is nothing ecological about feminism, which in its holistic praxis has been female-solipsistic through and through, to say nothing of supremacist. For all of its green rhetoric, the women's movement has persistently acted oblivious to the sexually interdependent nature of human well-being.

Women's well-being is not some 4X monster truck which you can drive anywhere you like, flattening the fences and flowerbeds, and running over men's well-being as if no such thing even existed. No, you cannot wreck one half of a social ecology without repercussions upon the other half. Forgive me for belaboring the totally fucking obvious, but you cannot limit your strychnine to just half of a well.

And yes, that IS what feminism has been doing, all of these many years—poisoning the well of life from which we ALL must drink! That is my own conclusion, and that is the conclusion of most politically conscious members of the men's movement all around the world. So . . . now you know exactly what manner of attitudinal tidal wave confronts you. This tidal wave is indisputably PRESENT on earth, and whether or not you agree with what this tidal wave is saying, the brute fact of its existence cannot be swept under the carpet, not can the inner sincerity of righteous conviction which it embodies.

Why am I telling you this? Because I think you need to know it. However, I am not telling you what to believe. Perish the thought! Your choice to believe or not believe is yours, and yours alone. But please understand that whichever choice you make, it will have consequences—a fact which bears sober consideration! Are we clear?

So as I stated earlier, you cannot simply consolidate your gains and stay the same, for if you undertook to do so, your power would melt away. And again as before, you have consequently only one choice: To keep moving and growing ad infinitum, just in order to satisfy the requirements of a perpetual revolution, and keep existing. But if you follow this course, you must keep doing what feminism has always done. And if you keep doing what feminism has always done, consequences will follow—consequences not only to men, and not only to the social ecology, but consequences to feminism in particular.

The main reason that feminism has gained so much ground over the years and reached its present status, is because it took a lot of people by surprise. It caught them napping. Doing nice things for women - who could possibly find fault with that? Nattering about some arcane legal pedantry like "rape is a crime of violence!"—sure, whatever...okay. Most men, including the present writer, were oblivious to the nine-mile snare that was gradually closing in around them. They didn't foresee the coordinated master plan. They couldn't possibly imagine the bearing of it all. Besides, they were too busy living their own lives.

But now things are changing. More and more men all the time are waking up to their objective political situation as men. They are bursting their mental shackles asunder, and learning to see the facts of the world flat-on, with their own eyes and with their newly reawakened native perceptions. Simply stated, they are becoming politically conscious.

And they are gaining critical mass.

This will have consequences for feminism. Once again, feminism is a perpetual revolution, and we know what that means, don't we? A perpetual revolution is bound by FATE to keep performing as it has always done, simply in order to keep existing as a revolution. It is programmed to operate in this way, and it can do none other! But this will pile up a heap of difficulties for you, for the simple reason that the men's movement is growing wise to your tricks, and furthermore, the men's movement is just plain GROWING.

Let me put that another way: The men's movement is getting SMARTER, and the men's movement is getting BIGGER! You guys have pulled the wool in front of our eyes for too many years, but we're not falling for it any more. For all of those years, YOU were growing while WE were sitting in the dark having shit fed to us. But now, WE are moving into the light, and WE are not eating your shit any more. And yes . . . we too are GROWING! At long last!

And that changes everything. The whole equation. The whole balance of power.

I am TELLING YOU THIS!!!

I am not telling you what to believe, I am just TELLING you!!!!

More and more men are seeing through the big lie that is the women's movement! More and more men understand that feminism is unnatural! More and more men know that feminism is morally bankrupt!

And something else. More and more men realize that arguing with feminism is the biggest time-waster the world has ever known! Feminism is NOT a rational force with a rational plan; you CANNOT argue with feminism! You cannot "reason" with it!!!!

And that is why I, a man, am NOT arguing with you now!

No. I am simply TELLING you WHAT IS WHAT!!!

I am simply TELLING you where it's AT!!!

I am simply TELLING you what TIME it is!!!

Suddenly, life has gotten very simple!

Life.

Has.

Gotten.

Very.

SIMPLE!!!

The men's movement is growing, and I PREDICT that it will continue to grow. And I PREDICT that as time goes on, you will meet more and more men like myself who will NOT waste their energy arguing with feminism! These men will devote themselves more profitably to organizing, mobilizing, preaching, exhorting, blogging, leafleting, educating, recruiting and finally . . . . taking direct action!

Those are my predictions. Believe them or not. It's your choice.

You see, you have finally met your match. You got a big head start upon us, to the tune of 40 years, and that is why you are strong and we are weak. You have outflanked us and outgunned us, and yes, outwitted us! You have gained victory in a one-sided war only because the other side never even knew that any war was under way. But the times are changing.

I said that life has gotten simple. What I meant to say is that life has gotten simple for US, not for you. For too long, feminism has made life complicated for men, while offering women a host of moral shortcuts in the game of life. This state of affairs is set to implode upon your heads, and the implosion will come about both from the ineluctable logic contained in the onrush of events, and from the accumulated moral force of male consciousness.

For at long last you are facing a highly motivated and highly aware opposition, which is morally and intellectually armed to the teeth, and understands you to a 'T'! That was not the case in years past, but is very much indeed the case now. That is why you have met your match.

And there is nothing you can do about it. Time is on our side. The men's movement, on its collective mind level, is a rational force with clearly understood goals and a growing consensus of grassroots support. Feminism is merely a perpetual revolution, an automaton, operating from a base of female supremacism, female solipsism, cognitive fragmentation, and artificial life support from various institutions, divorced from the social ecology of the ecumenical human condition.

Being a perpetual revolution, you can do only do what you are programmed to do, mindlessly clanking along and churning up the world in your path according to the ever-shifting requirements of your revolutionary drive for power. But you will find that your programming, which served you well enough in years past when you faced no meaningful opposition, will no longer serve you under the altered conditions which are now arising in the world. It will be a new game, in which our side will advance steadily and overtake you. You have a 40-year advantage, but that gap will diminish. It is only a matter of time.

Life for you will become more difficult, more vexing, more taxing of your energy. The world will become more polarized—you against us—and this polarity will give you plenty of moral headaches! And still, the movement of men will continue to gain upon you in its slow, patient, orchestrated manner.

Expect your movement to fragment, or more accurately, to pull apart like taffy under the stress of socio-political tidal forces. Look around you, it is happening even now! As our movement and your movement come to loggerheads, your movement—being challenged at every trick and every turn of the cards—will find itself increasingly stymied as a perpetual revolution, unable to carry on in that capacity. Deprived of this perpetually whirling, self-validating energy, your movement will be forced to think outside the box and begin seeing itself objectively. Your followers will undergo cognitive dissonance to a growing degree, and many of them will commence back-peddling, soft-peddling, hedging, compromising, and finally. . . jumping ship altogether.

When feminism ceases to be a perpetually revolving, generating center of political energy, it will cease to be recognizably feminism at all. The entropy, once it is forbidden to flow outward, will instead turn inward. It will become centripetal; it will contract. And thereupon things will commence to unravel even within your very own gates. Being unable any longer to feed upon the world, your movement will auto-cannibalize. Your perpetual revolution, rather than chewing up the world, will turn inward and devour itself, owing to the force of counter-feminist pressure. The radius will grow smaller and smaller, and although the exposed core will burn more fiercely than ever, this too will boost the demise of it.

If all of this sounds like wild, mystical talk, I can assure you that plenty of brothermen in the movement—whose intelligence I respect and with whom I am right proud to be associated—will eventually read this, will comprehend in full what I am saying here, and will know exactly how to make their varied endeavors comport with the matter I have shared. Not that it makes any difference. I am only predicting the course of developments, and these will unfold with or without my poor support.

But you must not forget that your movement will reach a standoff with the movement of men in which all argument, all debate, all effort by either side to convince the other, will be futile. Equally futile, on that day, will be your customary strategy of appealing to male guilt. Remember that you are facing a growing body of people who will only laugh at you, and scoff at you, and throw feminist guilt right back in your face! And when they do this, how do you intend to answer it? You'll not dissuade them, and if you try to suppress them by force—leveraging the power of law and the state—then the situation will grow steadily more volatile, and your own position inexorably more tenuous, along the line of the scenario which I have described.

The writing is on the wall. You have been weighed in the balance and found wanting. Your kingdom shall be demanded of you.

And the day will arrive when one choice only shall be given you.

On that day you shall have none other boot, than come to the table and NEGOTIATE, like it or not, with people such as we whom now you deem scarcely human. And the taste of this will be like unto bitter ashes in your mouth, but that is none of our doing..

Some of you might be wise to skip the negotiation part altogether, by the very simple expedient of changing sides. Defecting, I mean. Some of you, I know, are nearly to that point already. I would remind you, as I have myself written elsewhere, that nobody is born a feminist. At the end of the day, "feminist" is little else than a word which certain people have stuck to themselves, by personal choice, as an identifying label. Possibly you too have made the personal choice to stick this word to yourself, even though the strength of your conviction is not particularly strong. Well consider now that such a sticky trifle is easily unstuck, and if it would not distress you unduly you should peel that little goober off your sleeve, wad it up and chuck it over your shoulder with never a backward glance.

No, let me say state that again, with vehemence: FLEE! Flee from that valley! Flee as you would flee the valley of Sodom and Gomorrah, and whatever you do, don't look back!

But for those who remain behind, there will be no course possible but negotiation. If you keep doing what you've always done, the movement of men will grow progressively more forceful until it renders your existence prohibitively difficult, sapping your velocity finally to the point of standstill.

And if, having come to this point, perpetual revolution fails . . . . then feminism fails—on the spot.

Either that, or negotiation starts.

And negotiation will address what, precisely? It will address the terms of feminism's obsolescence. No more and no less.

It will be in your interest to negotiate, to step out of your briar patch and square up to the world. Posterity will judge you more kindly if you do.

If you undertake deceit in the manner of your negotiation, in hopes of perpetuating your revolution by subterfuge, then the vigilant eye of counter-feminist scrutiny will quickly make note of your devices, and your eventual reckoning will be the harsher for it.

We shall have, I trust, occasion to speak further of these things.

Labels:

Thursday, January 25, 2007

My New Blog: "WDLT"

I have started publishing a secondary blog for the purpose of showcasing stories, both contemporary and historical, which display women at their worst. This will feature the likes of female murderers, child abusers, paternity fraudsters, rape perjurers, gold-diggers, exceptionally vile feminists, she-animals from history, and for good measure, some women who have simply made royal asses of themselves.

The name of my new blog is Counter-Feminist Information!

For short, call it CFI.

The blog's main purpose, apart from entertainment, is to serve as an archive for such material, which I believe ought to be stored up in the collective brain of the movement and become integral to counter-feminist folklore.

All items, as you will observe, are posted according to the PWC (Presented Without Comment) formula.

I hope this will become a major resource eventually, and I welcome any finds that you feel are worthy of being added to the collection.

Wednesday, January 24, 2007

Woman Tries to Roast Baby in Oven

Police: Orlando mom puts baby in oven over breakup with boyfriend

The Associated Press
Posted January 9 2007, 10:13 PM EST

ORLANDO -- A woman was charged with aggravated child abuse for putting her baby in an oven, turning it on and leaving her apartment after fighting with her boyfriend,police said.

The oven had not gotten hot enough to burn the child, whose age was not immediately available.

Sharlyn Singh, 29, was at the Orange County Jail on a $15,000 bond Tuesday.

A man who was helping Singh's boyfriend move out of the apartment Monday heard the baby crying and walked into the kitchen. He told police that he asked Singh where the baby was, but she did not answer and walked out of the apartment. He found the baby in the oven, police said.

Officers that answered the call reported seeing oven grease on the child's hand and clothes.

Police did not release the boyfriend's name and his relationship to the child was unclear.

It was not immediately known if Singh had an attorney.


-----------------------

I am posting this AP story "without comment", as an exercise in counter-feminist female-bashing.

What is counter-feminist female-bashing, you ask? Simply this: It is a campaign to balance the scale of gender equality by disseminating well-attested information about lousy things which individual women have done. Feminism has campaigned long and hard to load the scale prejudicially on the male side, and that means counter-feminism has got its work cut out for it! We must purposefully load weight on the female side of the balance beam in order to equalize things.This is considered counter-feministical because it counters feminism's effects in the world, and by so doing trims the web closer to the spider. Dig?

The key principle to bear in mind, is to present information WITHOUT COMMENT. Don't offer any angry rhetorical ballast about "ho's, skanks, bitches" and the like. Just stick to the facts, like Joe Friday.

Let the facts SPEAK FOR THEMSELVES.

That way, you aren't truly bashing anybody; they've effectively bashed themselves already! You're just sharing it with the world.

I would encourage everybody in the counter-feminist camp to archive female-negative stories of this kind on a regular basis, and share them with both your counter-feminist co-workers, and with the human race at large.

Don't forget to include dates, sources, and URLs with the various items. Just for archivalism's sake....

Sunday, January 21, 2007

An Old Favorite Which Warms My Heart



Remember:
  • 1. Don't take it literally!

  • 2. Lighten up! It's only a t-shirt!

  • 3. It has nothing to do with feminism!

  • 4. Oh quit whining! Suck it up!

  • Saturday, January 13, 2007

    The Gaming Philosopher

    Note the following:

    http://gamingphilosopher.blogspot.com/2006/10/sexism-in-realms.html

    I stumbled upon this whilst I was putzing around in Google Blog Search.

    I find it interesting, and I present it "without comment", for its informative value to the counter-feminist intelligence community.

    Plundering the Brain of the Enemy

    Here is a link to a pro-feminist men's movement website in, of all places, Finland!

    http://www.profeministimiehet.net/old/question.htm

    Very well, by now we all know how far beneath contempt is the idea of a "pro-feminist" men's movement. The actual men's movement has by now amassed a sufficient body of critical theory and pertaining data to give that concept a brutally hard run for its money. Why, you'll find plenty of thought-tools on this blog alone - and that is only scratching the surface.

    On the other hand, if you are keen to be a collaborationist and self-betrayer, then by all means hook up with Hugo S., or Michael K., or Michael F. or the execrable Jackson Katz, or any of their clones. I'm sure they'd be glad to have you, and from thenceforth I'll not presume to address you by the honored title of brotherman, since I surely wouldn't care to offend your feelings by an expression so politically dangerous!

    But seriously, why am I sharing this with readers of The Counter-Feminist? Well, for one thing, because it is always a good maxim to "know thine enemy". Study them. Spy on them. Eavesdrop on them, and know what they are saying to each other.

    But I'd like you to think about something else. I'd like you to give the linked document a quick but careful read and see what you can learn about the organizing principles for a socio-political movement. Any socio-political movement. I think that our enemies have something to teach us here...

    In fact, I believe they have given us a gift. Check it out, homies! If you tweak a few keyterms here and there, reshuffle a concept or two, and delete a few bits that are clearly not pertinent, you will end up with a jim-dandy operating template for our very own counter-feminist movement! Ain't it swell, when your foe does all the work for you?

    And that, comrades, is what counter-feminism is all about: Saving our own energy and making them do the work!

    Anyway....I'd like to share the following snippet from the above-linked page, because I think it will make many of you irate!! It shows VERY clearly the brand of obtuse, politically pig-headed people we are dealing with - as if you didn't know already:
    Is profeminism related to the men's movement?

    This is a difficult question to answer since the term 'men's movement' has been used in many different ways. Some men's movement groups that support feminism and the women's movement are well established. Others, however, are regressive movements, such as fathers' rights, men's rights groups and other anti-feminist movements. Thus the term 'men's movement' remains ambiguous and can potentially be politically dangerous.

    This fairly transpires malevolence, like a fetid breath from a quagmire!

    I especially like the way anything that supports feminism and the women's movement is characterized as "well-established". Interesting choice of words. What this says to me is that they, not we, are "the establishment." Do you understand what that implies? It implies that feminism, a product of the radical anti-establishment 1960s, is no longer a "revolutionary" movement! WE are the anti-establishment freedom-fighters now! Does that thought give you a rush of exhiliration? It should!

    Yes, it seems that being "well-established" stands as a criterion of respectability in the profem writer's mind. But let's see what else is written. It is implied by exclusion that anything which does not "support feminism and the women's movement" is, get this ...."regressive". As opposed to "progressive". Ahhhh......now do you get it? The idea that fathers have rights, is "regressive". The idea that men have rights, is "regressive". And the idea that there is anything wrong with the idea that either of those ideas is "regressive".....is "regressive". As opposed to being "well-established". Have you got that all sorted out? It's a hideous pretzel to be sure, but such is the nature of their game, and we'll need to do some twisting of our own, in order to untwist all the things they've twisted in the first place.

    It's clear as hell how the other side sees us. In their minds, we are a politically dangerous, regressive, non-established, potentially criminal fringe element which needn't be respected, and needn't be taken seriously unless we gain too much power. I would even say, they consider us "Jews" of a sort! I think they are looking for an excuse to leverage the arm of the state against us in a big way, while pushing us deeper and deeper into a propaganda mud-hole. The scary thing is that they are "well-established" enough to do exactly that.

    I leave you now, but I give a parting political tweak of the nose, and a Bronx raspberry, to the Profeministimiehet people in Finland, who have done such nice work for the counter-feminist movement!

    Thursday, January 11, 2007

    Martha of Afghanistan

    Our old friend 'Martha' has paid me a flowery compliment today on his web blog, and I just HAD to share it with all of my regular readers:

    http://md1992.blogspot.com/2007/01/traitor-in-our-midst.html

    Martha was also kind enough to drop his drawers and leave a couple of fragrant turds in a couple of the comment logs, specifically, for the following posts:

    Stay Away from this CLOWN.

    Moderated Comment to Feminist Nation.

    Martha, dude, you are just trop charmante! :-}

    Oh hey, Faith of the "Feminist Country" blog has said that we men are getting the punishment that we deserve, and we should SURRENDER. So I told her that I would surrender. Would you like to join me in surrendering? How about it, eh? I mean, she said that "men" must surrender. But I'm not "men", see, we need at least 2 to make a quorum. Know what I'm saying?

    Monday, January 08, 2007

    Neues Männerblog aus Deutschland

    Here is an interesting male-friendly blog that has recently arrived on my radar screen via my stat log:

    http://dschindschin.blogspot.com/

    One good link deserves another, and when I found that Dschinblog had linked to The Counter-Feminist, I quickly returned the favor. (See link list at right.)

    You will notice that Dschinblog's content is entirely in German. That may prove to be a barrier for many of you....or else a challenge to study German and thereby strengthen the internationalism of our movement.
    "Dieser Blog ist ein Männerblog. Er ist ein Männerblog, weil ich ein Mann bin und damit die männliche Sicht der Dinge einbringe.
    Jawohl!

    For me it was, naturally, a challenge. I can read French and Spanish almost as well as English, but my knowledge of German - although not entirely lacking - is rather more spotty. Thus, my Verständnis of any German text is like scrutinizing a landscape through a heavy mist - the shapes and silhouettes stand out well enough, but so much detail is lost that I'm not always precisely sure what I am looking at.

    Nevertheless, what I roughly understood, I very much enjoyed! And yes, I do believe I will dust off my paperback edition of Herr Langenscheidt's most excellent dictionary, and expand my horizons yet again! The men's movement certainly provides some wonderful opportunities for that, eh?

    This opens the gate to a whole new world of men's activism that most of us Anglophonic types are only dimly aware of - a more "continental" view of things! Judging by Dschinblog and its link list to German websites, much is happening over yonder! And all you connoisseurs of Serious German Intellectualism will find quite a bonanza here, too! Genießen Sie!

    Tuesday, January 02, 2007

    Freedom of the Press: Use It!

    Note to my comrades in Quebec, and to all interested parties: The GIF file displayed here should take the place of the one that was posted earlier. In my haste, I foolishly overlooked something that I already knew perfectly well - that these things print out larger than they display on screen. It's a mistake I'll not make again...

    Before too long, I hope to make an actual mastersheet available for download. In the meantime, those so inclined may print, cut, paste up, photocopy, and cut again....

    Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting

    Ahhh....those pesky "disruptor memes"!

    You can photocopy 12 of these little blighters from a standard 8.5' x 11' master sheet. That's standard letter format, for the cognoscenti.

    For about 50 American buckeroos, or your local equivalent, you will be the proud owner of around SIX-THOUSAND of them!

    You may want to invest in a bayonet style paper cutter. You'll get tired of scissors, trust me!

    SIX-THOUSAND!!!! Think of the possibilities!

    Rats Deserting a Sinking Ship?

    Please note the following, posted two days ago at the Male Matters blog, and linked also by Angry Harry:

    Are mainstream media ending their support to ideological feminism?

    Are the angry waters swirling faster and rising higher around the enemy? Maybe so.

    But it ain't over until it's over, friends! Once more unto the breech...