Chitter-chatter at Yahoo! Answers

An interesting thread has recently been posted to Yahoo! Answers, and I give the link below:

http://tinyurl.com/3b6mre

The original question on this Yahoo thread was composed by a twittering bird-brain who answers to the name of waswisgirl1. The color of her intellect - as revealed by the content of her words - would appear to suggest a person who cannot type and blow on her nail polish at the same time:

"Do these groups represent Men Rights Activists, or are they just radicals? Who does speak for MRA's? Many of the Men's Rights Activist (MRA) groups are new groups and some of them are quite radical. There are radicals in every movement, MRA's are no exception, so what do MRA's and feminists, non-feminists, and anti-feminists think of MRA's such as these? Are they representatives of MRA's or radicals?:"

There follows a list of links to Movement websites. And I am HONORED to see that "counterfem" is the very first item on that list - followed by a link to 'Heretical Sex', a blogger whom I esteem very highly!

I am also a bit puzzled: I don't fully understand why waswisgirl1 selected those particular links for inclusion on the same list. Talk about strange bedfellows! I mean, in some cases the logic is apparent - but not always. Heavens, what was she thinking, anyway? I'm guessing that she used a very subjective, feelings-based approach when she compiled that list.

After the link list, waswisgirl1 concludes her remarks with the following brief paragraph:

"Feminists are told by anti-feminists, non-feminists and MRA's to denounce the radical feminists. How do MRA's propose to do the same for their movement? How can we tell who represents MRA's or are just radicals?"

For the record, I Fidelbogen, the present writer, am a RADICAL. Just don't forget that there are many different kinds of radicals in this big wide world - so you mustn't expect me to agree with all of them.

A string of comments follows waswisgirl1's Yahoo Question, and when you go there you will find that most of these are of a vacuity comparable to that of waswisgirl1. The fact that so many people on the other side simply do not understand what is going on is, in its way, encouraging. They are in denial, and they are SO bloody thick, and SO fucking clueless, that we should have an easy job to saw the floor from under their feet.

I too, have posted a comment on that Yahoo thread - as you will discover.

For waswisgirl1 and similar folk who might end up reading this, I invite you to visit the following link - which might tend to your enlightenment. Although heaven knows I'm not counting on it:

http://tinyurl.com/2tcm6cl

Please understand: I honestly don't care if you believe anything which you read there. That choice is yours and yours alone. But at least you have been warned; you can no longer plead ignorance.