A Sanguinary Turbulence
"Stories like these, of men falsely accused of rape and wrongly imprisoned, make my blood boil. These men are not only victimized by their accuser but by the courts, the prison system, and society as well. That society makes such a radical distinction between sexually and non-sexually related crimes is revealing in itself. We are neither as liberated nor rational about sex as we would like to believe. Men accused of sexual assault can receive sentences more harsh than those accused of murder and are held in far more contempt. That sexual assault cases can elicit so much unpurged anxiety and neuroses should, at the very least, cause us to ask why. That there are few if any penalties for false accusation concerning such offenses is not merely an oversight, it is judicially embedded sexism of the most pernicious sort. Exceedingly irreparable harm is done through insidious and willful neglect to protect citizens from false accusation. There are no greater examples of injustice both offensive and injurious to the health of a body and mind than the damage incurred by false accusations and zealous policies that imprison men for crimes they have not committed. This is especially true when the accusations pertain to a crime so highly politicized and irrationally responded to as rape."What more can I say?
However, it is clear to those of us who follow such things, that false accusation of rape is nothing less than a social cancer and a ticking time-bomb, for which FEMINISM must be held accountable! Oh yes, and I'm calling Susan Brownmiller front and center. . . among numerous others! (But I have arraigned Susan elsewhere already!)
Brotherman, the feminists don't give a good goddamn, if some filthy lying skank perjures herself and sends your innocent ass up the river for twenty years of involuntary sodomy and possibly worse. Her word is holy gospel with the weight of lead upon the balance beam of justice, because as the feminists are so dutiful to inform us: women don't lie about rape! Yes, women don't lie about rape, women never lie about rape -- and because women never lie about rape, that means that we must always believe the woman, through every stage of the criminal justice procedure from the very first police interview to the final deliberation of the jury or the final deliberation of hizzoner upon his lofty judicial bench!! Women never lie about rape, and so we must always believe the woman! And why? Because. . . women never lie about rape! See how that works?
But to a feminist that is all jim-dandy because, although it is true that men can suffer, they cannot be oppressed -- and the distinction between suffering and oppression is a very crucial one, you understand! And that means that the mere suffering of men (or of any particular man) is nothing to get fussed about, because in the grand political scheme of things it is only oppression that truly matters. And once we clear the decks of all that bad oppression everyone will be "equal" and no longer able to oppress each other because all the power will then be "equally" distributed. So bearing these remarks in mind, it is easy to comprehend why a man who gets railroaded by a rape liar is not being oppressed. Nor is any other man, who gets railroaded in any one of the many other ways, that women are now permitted to railroad men. For you see, equal protection under the law is not a "men's right", it is simply a "male privilege". Do you follow me? This means that men are only being made to "suffer" loss of "male privilege", but they are not being oppressed! Do you see the difference?
So my friend, if you end up in the Big Hotel and the booty bandits are beating at your back door one night, you might find it helpful to repeat to yourself like a mantra, that "this is not oppression", and "women never lie". And you may find additional chicken soup for your soul in the wise words of the oh-so-feminist Catherine Comins, that "men who are unjustly accused of rape can sometimes benefit from the experience." Remember that she said "sometimes", which means that she wasn't necessarily referring to YOUR particular case. Therefore you will know enough not to take such a statement personally. Do you see what I'm saying?
Now go HERE: http://falserapesociety.blogspot.com/