Dutton Deluxe!
For roughly a third of a century the feminists, with their countless running-dogs and lackeys, have been spreading ill-supported claims about domestic violence -- specifically violence by men against women within the confines of intimate relationships, e.g. dating, co-habitation and marriage.
As said, this feminist information is disputed, because over the years a body of highly creditable studies have cast SERIOUS doubt upon its veracity.
This counter-evidence lends weighty support to the overall conclusion that, despite what the feminists have told us for many years and continue telling us today, men and women initiate domestic violence at roughly equal rates. Men, I mean, are not the primary aggressors. Neither are women, as a group, innocent lambs.
These studies also present a cogent line of argument that the feminist theory of 'patriarchal power and control' is explanatory hogwash. In most (if not all) cases, it is simply not true! A variety of other factors (mostly psychological) would appear to generate the symmetrically distributed partner violence between men and women. So-called 'patriarchy' has nearly nothing to do with it.
In other words, the situation for women is not nearly so bleak as the feminists would make it. It seems that women are already equally empowered in the realm of domestic violence! You'd think this would be good news, and that the feminists would be overjoyed to hear it. But NO! They don't even want to hear this at all, and they have been known to get violently angry at people who have tried to make such information known to the general public. That is because the feminists are a pack of filthy liars and, being the guilty dogs that they are, they don't want their guilt exposed to the disinfecting sunlight of the world's gaze! Such exposure would not only humiliate them personally, but would furthermore place feminism, both as an ideology and as a movement, in serious jeopardy. And deep in the unexamined rat-holes and crevices of their minds they know it! It wouldn't do their credibility a speck of good if everybody learned that they've been spreading vicious, defamatory falsehoods concerning half the human race, and then using these same falsehoods as the foundation for radical innovations in law and social policy.
But enough of my inflammatory and overwrought words! Today, I'd like to share with you a 44-page PDF file, published by the St. Neots Abuse Project of St. Neots, Cambridge, UK -- which by my understanding runs the only DV shelter in England that accepts men! This PDF is a repackaged version of certain writings by the distinguished Canadian DV expert Donald Dutton (of the University of British Columbia). Dutton, in my opinion, is one of the best (if not THE best) scholars in this field, and copies of his work should have a place in every MRA library. And if you are a neophyte on the subject of feminist DV lies and their many debunkings, the material which I offer herewith for download should get you up to speed pretty quickly on the broad outlines in this realm of information -- and quite a bit of the detail as well!
http://tinyurl.com/6m58mr
All right, I recommend that you follow the instructions given below:
Cheers!
As said, this feminist information is disputed, because over the years a body of highly creditable studies have cast SERIOUS doubt upon its veracity.
This counter-evidence lends weighty support to the overall conclusion that, despite what the feminists have told us for many years and continue telling us today, men and women initiate domestic violence at roughly equal rates. Men, I mean, are not the primary aggressors. Neither are women, as a group, innocent lambs.
These studies also present a cogent line of argument that the feminist theory of 'patriarchal power and control' is explanatory hogwash. In most (if not all) cases, it is simply not true! A variety of other factors (mostly psychological) would appear to generate the symmetrically distributed partner violence between men and women. So-called 'patriarchy' has nearly nothing to do with it.
In other words, the situation for women is not nearly so bleak as the feminists would make it. It seems that women are already equally empowered in the realm of domestic violence! You'd think this would be good news, and that the feminists would be overjoyed to hear it. But NO! They don't even want to hear this at all, and they have been known to get violently angry at people who have tried to make such information known to the general public. That is because the feminists are a pack of filthy liars and, being the guilty dogs that they are, they don't want their guilt exposed to the disinfecting sunlight of the world's gaze! Such exposure would not only humiliate them personally, but would furthermore place feminism, both as an ideology and as a movement, in serious jeopardy. And deep in the unexamined rat-holes and crevices of their minds they know it! It wouldn't do their credibility a speck of good if everybody learned that they've been spreading vicious, defamatory falsehoods concerning half the human race, and then using these same falsehoods as the foundation for radical innovations in law and social policy.
But enough of my inflammatory and overwrought words! Today, I'd like to share with you a 44-page PDF file, published by the St. Neots Abuse Project of St. Neots, Cambridge, UK -- which by my understanding runs the only DV shelter in England that accepts men! This PDF is a repackaged version of certain writings by the distinguished Canadian DV expert Donald Dutton (of the University of British Columbia). Dutton, in my opinion, is one of the best (if not THE best) scholars in this field, and copies of his work should have a place in every MRA library. And if you are a neophyte on the subject of feminist DV lies and their many debunkings, the material which I offer herewith for download should get you up to speed pretty quickly on the broad outlines in this realm of information -- and quite a bit of the detail as well!
http://tinyurl.com/6m58mr
All right, I recommend that you follow the instructions given below:
1. Read the entire PDF from start to finish, taking your sweet time and savoring every sentence as you go along.Once you have completed the two-step plan as given, you will be quite a wizard as per the information contained in the PDF. Which, in my considered opinion, is a damn good kind of wizard for any MRA to be! ;)
2. Repeat step number one 39 times, for a grand total of 40 readings.
Cheers!
posted by Fidelbogen at 5:47 PM
3 Comments:
I remember Dutton. There was a big spate of tv spots and newspaper articles in Vancouver when a student , it turned out falsely and quite psychotically accused him of sexual misconduct. She was shown and proven later to absolutely lieing and did it with a straight face.. really whacked out. She kept lieing until the wheels fell off. It was really quite amazing because it was the first time some media had cottoned on to the games that were being played at whim, mercilessly and repetitively by women these days.
@anon: Yes, I too am aware of that particular chapter in Dutton's life.
It would have, in any event, no bearing upon the merit of his work -- which must stand upon its OWN merit. No mixing of the "personal" with the "political"!
The woman in question was a good servant of the femplex ( or: feministical operations complex), whether she called herself a "feminist" or otherwise.
Feminism's occult teaching, which has been widely instilled into the culture for decades, is that men are fair game, and that women are not to be held morally accountable in their dealings with men.
People such as Dutton, who by their activities very clearly threaten the femplex, ought as a point of "professional paranoia" to anticipate such attacks -- and brace themselves accordingly!
For those who mightn't have heard, Donald Dutton was an expert witness for the PROSECUTION in the O.J. Simpson trial.
Evidently, he "believed the woman" in this case! So to speak.
But as we all know, it isn't about believing the woman OR the man.
Ultimately, it's about believing the EVIDENCE.
And I rest my case, or any future case, upon that statement.
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home