The Importance of Feminism
"I don't need to convince men that feminism is important, that just isn't a goal of mine. I can't even have that conversation, of whether or not it's important, because if someone asks me that they're my mortal enemy and I don't want to have a conversation with them until they grow-up."You may wish to add this snippet to the classic list of feminist quotations that we are all so familiar with—the one that has been circulating for years.
— Kathleen Hanna: the original Riot Grrl; founder of the band Bikini Kill
For my own part, I could never entertain the least shred of doubt as to the importance of feminism. To give voice to such doubt, to propagate such doubt through the world at large, just isn't a goal of mine. I am indeed profoundly convinced that feminism is very, very important—and to undertake any additional persuasive exercise for my benefit would be an effort entirely misspent. Therefore, Kathleen Hanna may rest easy—secure in the knowledge that here is one man who needn't be convinced and accordingly needn't grow up. Moreover, it warms my heart and gives me the fuzzy-wonderfuls to know that Kathleen Hanna and myself are the best of friends—since, given that it would never cross my mind to "ask her that", it clearly follows that we aren't mortal enemies. And you'll never know what a blessed relief and a Balm of Gilead it is to me, and what a grievous burden of affliction it doth lift from my soul, to be able to say this!
Feminism is "important" because it is a matter of import—which is to say, a matter of consequence or significance. Knowing what I know of feminism, and the magnitude of shadow it throws upon the world, how could I ever possibly suggest the contrary? My good friend Kathleen Hanna and I would never, ever have occasion for "that conversation" in any form, since we are most assuredly of one mind upon the key article that feminism is a matter of import. That thesis is rock-solid, and not the least subject to disputation. So it is settled once for all, between Kathleen Hanna and myself, that feminism does not lack importance!
A few years ago, I was acquainted with a certain young man—a good-natured chap and, let me say it, rather simple—who didn't know what feminism was! I spoke the word during a conversation, and he looked at me blankly and said "what's that?" (To add some human context here, this young man was living with his girlfriend at the time. She was an art student, and just then in the process of discovering Susan Sontag's writings. She was later sexually unfaithful to him and, on her own initiative, broke up with him.)
Now it might seem harsh to the young man, to say of him that he needed to "grow up". A perhaps uncharitable imputation, considering that he didn't even know what feminism was in the first place and so could offer no meaningful assessment of its importance. Yet the sad fact remains, that my good friend Kathleen Hanna would have needed to convince him, and to have had "that conversation" with him. And this, understandably, just wouldn't be a goal of hers, since if he were to say to her "what's that?", he would clearly be requesting—by implication— a validation of feminism's importance, meaning that the implied burden of providing such validation would fall upon her.
And we couldn't have that now, could we? Or couldn't we? Clearly, somebody around here needs to grow up . . . wouldn't you say?
At any rate, I would carry all of this a bold step further. I would proclaim that feminism collectively, as a whole, is likewise exempted from any duty to convince us of its "importance"—and somehow, I feel certain that my excellent good friend Kathleen Hanna would enthusiastically second my initiative, for if she would personally claim the right to such a thing, how could she not make it freely available to the entire Sisterhood as well, eh?
Therefore it seems that neither Kathleen, nor the feminist movement collectively, has any duty to convince us that feminism is important. In the same vein, they have no duty to explain WHY feminism is important, since they would need to explain this as a part of explaining the first thing. Are you with me?
Mind you, I'm talking about men specifically as targets of the exemption. So I'm guessing that women are free to interrogate at will, and that we men can provide our designated female proxies with long lists of questions to take to such sessions?
But wait! Can it be that women too are on my good friend Kathleen Hanna's mortal enemies list, when they attempt to have "that conversation"? My good friend isn't quite so clear upon this point, but I wouldn't hold that against her, since she IS my good friend after all!!
All right, let's make this simple—at least until my very good friend gets back here with some damn straight answers! Since Kathleen Hanna and every feminist on earth presumably has no duty to convince the rest of the world (including women) that feminism is important, or why it is important, and since I am myself quite fully convinced that feminism is enormously important indeed—meaning consequential and significant in the grand scheme of things—then it shall please me enormously to make the truth about feminism acidly known to the world at large.
My most exemplary and highly esteemed friend Kathleen Hanna, and her eminently worthy feminist sisters, may depend on it that I will step happily up to the plate in their stead and work like the devil to convince both men and women, the wide world over, of the importance of feminism. And you know what? I won't even wait for those people to "grow up" either. Heavens no, I'll get straight to work, toot-sweet, on that oh-so-vitally important conversation, ah . . .yes indeeeeed. . . . . !
Consider: I have been publishing, for just over two years, a web log called The Counter-Feminist. And for all of that time it has been my unflagging endeavor to convince people that feminism is a matter of profoundly great importance. Seriously: would I call myself The Counter-Feminist if I didn't believe that feminism was important? Feminism, I can assure you, is in the best possible hands. . . . . ;-)



13 Comments:
Well I also wouldn't want to have a conversation with Kathleen Hanna until she grows up. The difference is that she regards me as her mortal enemy (a grown-up attitude indeed), whereas I prefer listening to the wind or walking under open skies instead of uselessly engaging in a militant attitude towards feminists.
They're their own mortal enemy, like a bacterial culture in a petri dish that had its days of maximum spread and now starts to collapse on itself. That's why they're so scared, so desperately in search of their "mortal enemies", but by design they are unable to realize that it's themselves.
Welcome to your feminist wasteland, Kathleen Hanna, you can have it all for yourself. I hope you don't mind us watching from a safe distance what you and your comrades-in-arms do with all that ammunition now. It will be quite a spectacle I'm sure.
A mortal enemy is an enemy who wants to kill you and whom you must kill.
If feminists really have mortal enemies, they ought to start a shooting war.
If they're not actually killing people, they should examine their dictionaries and figure out what "mortal" means in the context of "enemy."
Yes, our mortal foe feminism has a lot to learn about a lot of things. That much is clear. ;-)
My friend linked me here with an email that said, "need another enemy?" It shocks me that I hadn't discovered you as my "mortal enemy" before!
a) Kathleen Hanna is a dinosaur in terms of feminist discourse, but I think you already know that. I'm tickled you're so tickled by her easy-to-eviscerate antagonism, but seeing as she's sounding like it's 1991 in 2000 (when that quote was given), I don't at all see how she reflects what's happening now, or what's been happening for 15 years.
She was relevant once, but it'd be a better punchline if you could find some actually current voices from this mythical, magical, monolithic feminism you're speaking of. Get back to me on that.
b. It's good of you to appreciate the importance of feminism, even if you're totally wrong and outdated. Your appreciation for power politics (ie "we are free and we don't know it") sorta totally unmasks you as not exactly "counter" feminism. Being a real counter to feminism would be denial of injustice itself, not so much a hatred of the approach, as you seem to have. Haha, you're totally what you hate!
c. Not only are you a feminist, you're sort of a victim feminist (all posts about the gilded calf of female sexuality? Tunnel vision, my friend). Gross. With this I have to conquer with the dinosaur and suggest that you might grow up on this issue.
Fidelbogen, underestimation is what got us here in the first place.
Feminism is quite the clever serpent, always casting its slough and reinventing itself. . .
CF, you are a naughty boy.
You have found a new play mate.
Yes, I like this L lady also. This is what the 'so called war' is all about.
Have fun my friend.
But please don't forget to pop in now and again at menz when you have time.
I like the MND site. They seem more my type. I am a conspiracy person after all. lol
I like soooo much to see you have fun with this.
@Julie:
Eh...Jools, I hate to say it, but. . .
I'm not sure what you're on about here. (I must drink my coffee. Maybe that'll help, hehehe! ;)
I think your example perfectly outlines why feminism is important to women: it allows them to read books by women (who aren't as good as male authors, there is no argument there....men rule every single academic and artistic endeavour there is), cheat on their spouses and then leave them. That outlines the goals and ideals of feminism perfectly. Now, as to whether it's important to the human race? Informationally perhaps, maybe in 100 years it will be known for what it is: one of communism/socialism's main social tools. As for actually empowering women, my mum is a hardcore feminist and has been since the 60's ... the only man who'll spend any time with her is her son....that's a perfect example of how useful these "empowered" women are to men.
@anon: Tut-tut, dear boy! Don't you know that "aren't as good as male authors" is only a patriarchal construct?
Ahh well. In the end, I suppose it really IS true, as the old Roman philosopher said: de gustibus non est disputandum. So let women have their authentic voice, say I. But not at the expense of MY authentic voice! No way!
@Michael:
"Welcome to your feminist wasteland, Kathleen Hanna, you can have it all for yourself. I hope you don't mind us watching from a safe distance what you and your comrades-in-arms do with all that ammunition now. It will be quite a spectacle I'm sure."
As I was reading over this again, suddenly I was reminded of the final moments in the movie "Mad Max".
Anybody remember that? World-class psychological gripper, wouldn't ya say. . ?
CF says, (to me)
I'm not sure what you're on about here. (I must drink my coffee. Maybe that'll help, hehehe! ;)
GREAT! FANTASTIC!
@fidelbogen: lol ... maybe I sounded a bit too apocalyptic in that sentence. But we're just starting to collect empirical data of how feminists react when falling on deaf ears - so anything is possible! ;-)
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home