Wednesday, May 13, 2009

The Dogged Pursuit of Equality

The graphic image you see here, shows a billboard which existed somewhere in Australia several years ago. It depicts a modishly dressed female controlling two naked men on a leash—as if they were dogs.

Images such as these arrive in the world at a particular time in response to historical energies. These things don't just happen. Rather—being the articulation of deep-seated emotions buried in the collective psyche and squeezed to the surface by the interplay of shifting forces—they happen for a reason. Now, in order to downplay anything resembling seriousness, you might wish to inform me that such things are only a hip, sophisticated, avant-garde "joke". And you might desire to make clear to me also, that only my want of sophisticated avant-garde hiptitude blocks me from understanding this, and from taking it in the proper spirit, and so joining the ranks of those witty avant-garde boulevardiers who toss these things off lightly with a glass of absinthe—or whatever the bloody hell they toss it off with!

Oh, bugger all of that! Listen, I'll tell you what. Here's the plan:

We shall design another billboard of the same size. On it shall be depicted a man wearing a black leather outfit reminiscent of an S.S. officer. We'll show this man holding a leash, and controlling two women—as if they were dogs. Picture to yourself those naked females, with their little fantails poised way up in the air, and their swingin' little knockers knockin' together pendulously. Got that?

All right, good! Next, let us install our new billboard directly across the roadway, opposite the original. So that henceforward, the passing stream of motorists and pedestrians will be administered the very same message with a double-sided treatment; they can swivel their gaze from one to the other, and back again, and the two hoardings will offset one another in a perfectly equilibriated equation.

Well, we all know what happens next. A gaggle of feminists finds the second billboard, and screams bloody murder about it, and demands that the horrid thing disappear post haste. But I would defer to their request on one condition only: that the original billboard across the way be likewise banished from the public eye.

I will not budge an inch; I will not bate a grain. Either both billboards stay, or both billboards go! That, my friend, is non-negotiable. End of subject.

But you know. . . the Larger Thing that I'm really talking about here, is calling the dogs off. Of course, you knew all along that I was talking about something larger, didn't you?

Mind you, we know perfectly well who let the dogs out in the first place! They did! But see, the problem is, they didn't let ALL the dogs out; they only let their OWN dogs out!

So in the name of consistency, under the sacred banner of No Double Standards, I INSIST (dogmatically if you will!) that ALL of the dogs be turned loose so they can run wild, wreak havoc, spread wrack and ruin, and knock over every dog-gone garbage can in every flea-infested alley from here to hell and back!

Yes, bring on ALL the dogs!!!!

OR . . . call off all the dogs!

Woof-woof!

Hey, I'm down with either scenario!

So what's it going to be then, eh? ;)

12 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

The poster is the subliminal taking form.

Ditto with Abu Ghraib and Lindy England in her little soldier outfit, with leash around the naked, blind-folded bodies of real-live beaten man. This is what feminism looks like, because this is what feminists want.

Ditto with the spectacle of Sadaam publicly executed, his sons shot dead, but his wife and daughters all somehow not being actively pursued - even though they are supposedly wanted for murder, torture, and appropriation of public funds.

1:49 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Isn't it interesting that the generality of women do not protest or oppose the display of images like the one above.They would have no trouble doing so if the shoe were on the proverbial other foot.

There is something about feminism that goes beyond mere feminists.

11:19 AM  
Blogger Fidelbogen said...

"Isn't it interesting that the generality of women do not protest or oppose the display of images like the one above.They would have no trouble doing so if the shoe were on the proverbial other foot."

Continuing in that vein: the generality of MEN are likewise disinclined to protest or oppose such images. They are more apt to suffer silently, or shrug it off.

But they are certainly apt to get up in arms about an affront to women. . .

(Yup: there more to feminism than feminists. But see below.)


"There is something about feminism that goes beyond mere feminists."

Indeed. I call it the femplex.

Click below:

There is More to Feminism than Feminism

4:01 PM  
Blogger Fidelbogen said...

"The poster is the subliminal taking form."

Truly. That nails it bang to rights!

4:02 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

There is More to Feminism than FeminismI see you have anticipated me by a couple of years.Almost to the very word!I'll try and catch up as best I can.Be a sport and slow down a bit. ;)

11:57 AM  
Blogger Fidelbogen said...

"I'll try and catch up as best I can.Be a sport and slow down a bit. ;)"


After you "catch up", I shall be interested to know what you have "caught".

I will tell the jackrabbit to slow down: hopefully the bunny listens! ;)

6:24 PM  
Anonymous Bhanu Prasad said...

That looks like a marketing gig designed by a ball-less wimpy male feminist lapdog. One of them must be Hugo Schwyzer and other must be john stolthenberg(The man who "enjoyed" being Andrea Dworkin's partner!!!).

8:58 PM  
Blogger Fidelbogen said...

@Bhanu:

John Stoltenberg. . .

I remember reading his classic feminist book entitled "Refusing to be a Man".

It was, I believe, the most disgusting experience I ever subjected myself to. . .

10:08 PM  
Anonymous Bhanu Prasad said...

@Fidelbogen,

John Stoltenberg must either be a saint or a beast to endure the bulk of Andrea Dworkin..

Without a shred of doubt, Andrea Dworkin is the most ugliest women to ever live on this planet.

7:45 AM  
Blogger The Archivist said...

I have to throw this out there, and I'll understand if this post doesn't make it in.

If men are dogs, as suggested by the picture, then by inference, women are B*tches, right?

Thus the danger of throwing stones in a glass house....


E. Steven Berkimer

7:46 PM  
Blogger Fidelbogen said...

@ESBerk:

Well, considering they belong to the same species, it would certainly be consistent that if men are male dogs, women must be the female counterpart. Symmetry would not go amiss, nor ought it be misconstrued . . . ;)

9:06 PM  
Blogger Coffee Catholic said...

Is this billboard REAL? How is that legal?????

1:01 AM  

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home