More in a Related Vein
When I am not composing words of mine own to share with the world, I busy myself like a bee gathering nectar from many blossoms. ;)
SO . . . I think you should go and study the following blog post, and especially the string of comments which are attached to it:
http://www.welmer.org/2009/07/24/hr-and-the-mancession/
For me, it was a riveting read. A convocation of intelligent people who have "been there", and offer an important window into the objective state of the world at this point in history.
I assume that you have all downloaded and at least partly read the PDF which I made available in the post before this one. What? You haven't done that? Tsk-tsk! Well here is the download link once again, you shameless laggards!
http://tinyurl.com/mq7vfx
As you will see, this all dovetails. What the morons on the PDF are talking about interfaces directly with the data on the Welmer.org discussion thread—these two documents illuminate each other!
From these, and countless other sources I have looked into, it is plain that "women", at least in the more developed nations, have no greater cause to complain about life in general than do men, and most likely LESS cause to do so. And I am being scrupulously conservative in making this statement, for my motto is always "measure twice, cut once." If women don't YET surpass men on the general quality of life index, then rest assured they soon will— and dramatically!
Wealth, power, education, legal privilege and a host of goods both tangible and intangible, are accruing to the female population at such a rate that if present trends continue, female supremacy will, in a few short years, become an accomplished fact of life in all but name. Please note that I said supremacy, not equality. For as any MRA worth his salt will tell you, feminism was NEVER about so-called equality—although they fooled a lot of people (including a lot of self-proclaimed feminists!) long enough to provide camouflage in the early stages. But now the mask is slipping.
So much for the idea that "women are oppressed". In a few short years, it will no longer be possible to assert any such thing with a straight face, and people will (albeit reluctantly for some) give up trying to do so.
And that is when full frontal female supremacy will come into its own, as in: pull out all the stops! The female oppression meme won't play any more, and the equality meme will be impossible to sustain without subverting the new regime, so it will be eased out the door. Since it will no longer be feasible to gouge men in the name of "redistribution", a new excuse will be necessary if gouging is to continue. That excuse shall be, that women are objectively better people than men, and that being so, they are entitled to greater authority in all domains of life, and to a deferential acknowledgment of this entitlement as a cultural norm.
That is how the de facto objective state of things will be regularized—and little by little made de jure. The idea that women are superior to men, will pass by open proclamation into the living instrumentalities of law, government and culture. And whoever takes exception to this new dispensation, will be morally stigmatized, politically ghettoized and criminalized, and forced into the underclass.
But then again, plenty of rogue variables may enter the picture and force the scenario to play out in a very different manner. For I have merely described how things will roll IF their designs go according to plan: I mean that this is how they would like things to happen! But snags and hitches may develop. May develop? No, they will develop! But the question is, just how far will the trajectory fly before these developments finally intervene? And how much sheer human misery might we anticipate in the course of all this? These, to be sure, are weighty considerations.
I will leave you to consider all these points in the light of Prophecy, as given HERE:
http://tinyurl.com/njv4xo
Notice that a "Part 2" was promised. And I never wrote that Part 2, did I? But trust me, I shall.
Finally, the following post on MRN's blog is of interest in the context of all that has been presented today. The comment thread includes contributions of my own:
http://tinyurl.com/m65h2h
SO . . . I think you should go and study the following blog post, and especially the string of comments which are attached to it:
http://www.welmer.org/2009/07/24/hr-and-the-mancession/
For me, it was a riveting read. A convocation of intelligent people who have "been there", and offer an important window into the objective state of the world at this point in history.
I assume that you have all downloaded and at least partly read the PDF which I made available in the post before this one. What? You haven't done that? Tsk-tsk! Well here is the download link once again, you shameless laggards!
http://tinyurl.com/mq7vfx
As you will see, this all dovetails. What the morons on the PDF are talking about interfaces directly with the data on the Welmer.org discussion thread—these two documents illuminate each other!
From these, and countless other sources I have looked into, it is plain that "women", at least in the more developed nations, have no greater cause to complain about life in general than do men, and most likely LESS cause to do so. And I am being scrupulously conservative in making this statement, for my motto is always "measure twice, cut once." If women don't YET surpass men on the general quality of life index, then rest assured they soon will— and dramatically!
Wealth, power, education, legal privilege and a host of goods both tangible and intangible, are accruing to the female population at such a rate that if present trends continue, female supremacy will, in a few short years, become an accomplished fact of life in all but name. Please note that I said supremacy, not equality. For as any MRA worth his salt will tell you, feminism was NEVER about so-called equality—although they fooled a lot of people (including a lot of self-proclaimed feminists!) long enough to provide camouflage in the early stages. But now the mask is slipping.
So much for the idea that "women are oppressed". In a few short years, it will no longer be possible to assert any such thing with a straight face, and people will (albeit reluctantly for some) give up trying to do so.
And that is when full frontal female supremacy will come into its own, as in: pull out all the stops! The female oppression meme won't play any more, and the equality meme will be impossible to sustain without subverting the new regime, so it will be eased out the door. Since it will no longer be feasible to gouge men in the name of "redistribution", a new excuse will be necessary if gouging is to continue. That excuse shall be, that women are objectively better people than men, and that being so, they are entitled to greater authority in all domains of life, and to a deferential acknowledgment of this entitlement as a cultural norm.
That is how the de facto objective state of things will be regularized—and little by little made de jure. The idea that women are superior to men, will pass by open proclamation into the living instrumentalities of law, government and culture. And whoever takes exception to this new dispensation, will be morally stigmatized, politically ghettoized and criminalized, and forced into the underclass.
But then again, plenty of rogue variables may enter the picture and force the scenario to play out in a very different manner. For I have merely described how things will roll IF their designs go according to plan: I mean that this is how they would like things to happen! But snags and hitches may develop. May develop? No, they will develop! But the question is, just how far will the trajectory fly before these developments finally intervene? And how much sheer human misery might we anticipate in the course of all this? These, to be sure, are weighty considerations.
I will leave you to consider all these points in the light of Prophecy, as given HERE:
http://tinyurl.com/njv4xo
Notice that a "Part 2" was promised. And I never wrote that Part 2, did I? But trust me, I shall.
Finally, the following post on MRN's blog is of interest in the context of all that has been presented today. The comment thread includes contributions of my own:
http://tinyurl.com/m65h2h
posted by Fidelbogen at 6:36 PM
12 Comments:
Your "Roadmap of the Future" reminds me yet again why I am the student, and you are the master.
I have to ask, whenever I analyze and assess an opponent's weaknesses and strengths, and find a strategy to beat them (actions carried out by selected groups, mostly involving a "catching on" to the rest of the groups to completely change the course of the river), is it so wise of me to post them here, in public? To let them see it coming? I don't overestimate my or our skill in finding "the winning play", but you have to remember, it was a child who finally told the emperor he wore no clothes.
I wouldn't want our actions so easily foretold and calculated against as to broadcast them... what do you think?
Be careful, Amstrat, ya might give me a swell head - and that would not be so masterful on my part! ;)
"I wouldn't want our actions so easily foretold and calculated against as to broadcast them... what do you think?"
It all depends on WHAT you broadcast.
Sometimes, it does them no good to know of your stratagems, if you have already calculated their response ahead of time. In fact, it is even possible that they are screwed no matter what they do, or what they know.
The point is, that you've always got them where you want them!
And no matter how they respond, or how they twist and turn, you've STILL got them where you want them.
They may know something about your calculations, but what they don't know is exactly how you have calculated what THEY have calculated from their knowledge of your calculations. Because every step of the way, you are merging with what they are thinking - putting them in a pipe and smoking them!
You feed them the exact style of info that will always set them at a foreknown fork in the road, and WHICHEVER branch they follow, you know where it goes, and when they get there, you are already waiting for them.
And then you lead them deeper and deeper into the maze of your plans, and the byzantine byways of your world, further and further from their own... ;)
And if they are clever enough to see through this policy, and decline to set foot in your world, then they have left you at peace in your world so that you may continue to mature your plans. . .
Accordingly, both obscurity and scrutiny can be made to serve you.
Ah yes, very good. I have to wonder though >.>
Have you ever read "The Art of War" by Sun Tzu?
I find it highly prizes deception and well masked methods. I think it would be to our benefit to study such a work. I've read it five times so far, each time revealing a bit more and more about the world and how to harness its powers to benefit the "Prudent Stratician", which would be the one who follows the principles both in and out of the book in the right manor.
Just a thought, since your game of Strategy is studying the histories and methods of the world and politics. I'd assume you'd already read it, but it's better to ask and not have needed to than to have NOT asked when I should've.
@Amstrat:
Yes, I am familiar with the work in question.
@Amstrat:
BTW: it is a favorite among MRA insiders of the old school. . .
@F, comment #2.
Ok, That is funny.
But did you know fishermen decided to become anglers with certain fish because they could see they had too much of an advantage. lol
"But did you know fishermen decided to become anglers with certain fish because they could see they had too much of an advantage. lol"
Too much of an advantage? Who?
The fish or the fishermen?
lol
;)
@F, the fishermen of course ;)
Well. That is certainly good hearing. . . ;)
Men have actually been the underclass throughout human history, and across all cultures. Since males are the 'genetic filter' for the species, they must compete in the stressful male dominance hierarchy (DH). The DH is vigorously policed by all of us - men and women. This stuff operates mostly at an unconscious level. Men are expendable, whereas females are the 'limiting factor' in reproduction and thus are 'prized'.
This is all based on recent scientific research and is spelled out in Steve Moxon's book "The Woman Racket". Warren Farrell gave the book a very strong positive review.
@Norm:
Yup, I read Steve Moxon's book a couple of years ago.
All that is happening nowadays is a novel configuration of the male dominance hierarchy.
Certain men have struck an unconventional power-sharing deal with certain women in order to more effectively dominate (and render helpless) a certain other group of men.
The actual mechanics of this is quite a bit more complicated, but that's the grist....
The last link in this post leads to a blog that has been made private (i.e. inaccessible).
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home