Real Feminists™ Are So Cute
When They're Mad!
Here is a very famous YouTube which "everybody" has seen. And of course, you know exactly what THAT means: it means that a lot of people have in fact NOT seen it! It is called Feminists Disrupt a Forum About Battered Husbands:
Yes, those are Real Feminists™, doing what Real Feminists™ really do, flaunting their real colors so that all the world can really see what Real Feminism™ really is! For real!
They are full of violence, aren't they? I wouldn't put it past some of these people to use their fists, or a handy firearm if they had one—and I think they would do so on a totally fraudulent ground of provocation, with no conscience or moral scruples of any kind. I think they would lie outrageously, for that is exactly the kind of people they are.
Their behavior is vintage NSDAP stuff straight from the early Weimar Republic, the principal difference being that these Real Feminists™ are girls, which makes it cute: they have curvaceous bodies with subcutaneous fat layers, melodious voices in a high register, and none of that beastly stubble on their faces!! And that is why society lets them get away with acting the way they act.
Furthermore, they are feminists. As we know. Whether any or all of them would frankly own up to that name is beside the point. And the point is what? It is, that they fit the feminist profile. They are violating a gathering of men who want to address the problem of female violence against men—and who but a feminist would commit such a violation? Would a non-feminist do such a thing?
And besides, if you put it to them, would ANY of these violent, violating females volunteer to step up and loudly proclaim to the world: "I am not a feminist!"? Seems a bit of a stretch, doesn't it?
But again, look at what is happening here. Is this a symposium of domestic abusers sharing tips on how to beat their wives more effectively? No, it is a group of men who want to address the problem of female violence against men. They want to DO something about it. They want to raise awareness of the issue.
And evidently, the Real Feminists™ have an issue with that. The fact that certain men want to raise awareness of female violence against men, makes the Real Feminists™ violently angry at those men, doesn't it?
Now, hypothetically speaking, I could suggest that those Real Feminists™ be horsewhipped within an inch of their lives and expelled from the auditorium with extreme prejudice. But I am NOT going to say that, because I don't want to sound like a National Socialist. :(
---------------------------------------------------
But now, just for fun, here's another little goody for you:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S7tX4Ma941E
;)
Yes, those are Real Feminists™, doing what Real Feminists™ really do, flaunting their real colors so that all the world can really see what Real Feminism™ really is! For real!
They are full of violence, aren't they? I wouldn't put it past some of these people to use their fists, or a handy firearm if they had one—and I think they would do so on a totally fraudulent ground of provocation, with no conscience or moral scruples of any kind. I think they would lie outrageously, for that is exactly the kind of people they are.
Their behavior is vintage NSDAP stuff straight from the early Weimar Republic, the principal difference being that these Real Feminists™ are girls, which makes it cute: they have curvaceous bodies with subcutaneous fat layers, melodious voices in a high register, and none of that beastly stubble on their faces!! And that is why society lets them get away with acting the way they act.
Furthermore, they are feminists. As we know. Whether any or all of them would frankly own up to that name is beside the point. And the point is what? It is, that they fit the feminist profile. They are violating a gathering of men who want to address the problem of female violence against men—and who but a feminist would commit such a violation? Would a non-feminist do such a thing?
And besides, if you put it to them, would ANY of these violent, violating females volunteer to step up and loudly proclaim to the world: "I am not a feminist!"? Seems a bit of a stretch, doesn't it?
But again, look at what is happening here. Is this a symposium of domestic abusers sharing tips on how to beat their wives more effectively? No, it is a group of men who want to address the problem of female violence against men. They want to DO something about it. They want to raise awareness of the issue.
And evidently, the Real Feminists™ have an issue with that. The fact that certain men want to raise awareness of female violence against men, makes the Real Feminists™ violently angry at those men, doesn't it?
Now, hypothetically speaking, I could suggest that those Real Feminists™ be horsewhipped within an inch of their lives and expelled from the auditorium with extreme prejudice. But I am NOT going to say that, because I don't want to sound like a National Socialist. :(
---------------------------------------------------
But now, just for fun, here's another little goody for you:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S7tX4Ma941E
;)
posted by Fidelbogen at 1:23 PM
5 Comments:
The more I see this, the less I think of them as people... my discerning eye sees a "male" joining in their heckling, as you may notice. We have an enemy in every faucet to tackle.
I think it's important to realize what/who you're up against, and what they would stoop down into doing. It's one thing to ignore an individual and position, to shut them out of your mind. But you cross a certain line when you prevent their communication to others, to boo them so they can't talk to those that ARE there to listen.
I believe they do this out of fear, fear of the inevitable. They know things are not right and that their gravy train is coming to an end, but they try to stall it as long as possible through disruption like this.
Well, thank you for the windfall of intel, Counter-Feminist! (this applies to your most recent post about the 136 pages of... key beliefs of the opposition)
"Now, hypothetically speaking, I could suggest that those Real Feminists™ be horsewhipped within an inch of their lives and expelled from the auditorium with extreme prejudice. But I am NOT going to say that, because I don't want to sound like a National Socialist. :("
I don't have a problem saying that women like that, women who want to thoroughly destroy order in society do deserve some sort of state-mandated punishment, some sort of corrective measure. And I also don't think that is a totalitarian attitude to have either.
Objectively speaking, there is a moral order that the order of law has the duty to maintain and protect. That is what makes a just society. If one allows people to destroy society under the freedon of religion, freedom of speech beliefs, then what is the point of having government at all? But this is the essential problem with everyone believing that each person's individual truth is true to them. There cannot be a just society when truth is relative to individuals.
In an ideal society those who conscientiously work against truth (absolute and objective) and true order in society would be answerable to the law. And it should be that way.
It's not okay for murderers and rapists to go around committing crimes, though admittedly there is a difference in the degree of those crimes (a big difference) and feminism. But they aren't punished only for hurting someone, but also because they have to be taught a lesson: we cannot not allow someone to be a menace to society. These feminists are a menace, and should be dealt with as such.
If the morality of Catholicism is too "totalitarian" for some, well, I guess their "happy" material human existence for a span of 70 years is more important than the life of their immortal soul in hell. The truth is true regardless of our assent to it. And I don't think that anybody should be afraid to assert it.
Yikes. I could only listen to about the first half--my nerves were jangling too much. That shriek very much reminds me of the background noise I hear when talking on the phone past naptime to my friend who has four children under the age of five at home. Articulate? Respectful? Polite? Logical? Eloquent? I think those words have been blacked out of the feminist dictionary. Someone needs to put those temper-tantruming harpies in their cribs for timeout.
Whenever I see something like this, I just shake my head and picture how the scenario would play out if the roles were reversed. Imagine a horde of eeeeeevil, violent, nasty, abusive, potential-rapist MEN (all together now: eeeeeeeek!! Men!!) invading a meeting about domestic violence against women. Imagine the repercussions. Getting smeared all over the internet and mainstream press as badly as if they themselves had been tried and convicted of abuse? Definitely. Getting arrested for disturbing the peace? Probably. Being physically attacked by the peeeeeaceful, timid, cringing, delicate, passive women who are ALWAYS The Victims Because Men Are Abusers And Women Are Victims? Yeah, I can see it happening.
Word verification: EFALSO. Haha, I am not making that up! It probably means "feminist garbage which is spread by email."
@Trent13:
"There cannot be a just society when truth is relative to individuals."
I think that the REAL difficulty begins when people act like BEHAVIOR is relative to individuals. It is not their thoughts(about truth or what-have-you) which concern me, but their actions.
@Sarah:
Thing is, in their own minds they KNOW that they are right, and therefore they can do no wrong. They are a tragic case of Feminist Subjectivism.
-------------
EFALSO is okay, but EFALSETTO would have been even better! ;)
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home