Wanted: Feminists to Betray Feminism
Greetings from the Exalted Office of the Serene Imperial Pontifex Maximus of the Non-Feminist Revolution:
The Non-Feminist Revolution is now hiring!
Are you an erstwhile Radical Feminist, or feminist of any grade at all, who has undergone a dramatic conversion experience or paradigm-shift? Do you look back on your former life through a greasy, speckled lens of nausea—as on a binge of shameful intoxication from which you have finally awakened with a ghastly hangover? Are you now ready to say good riddance to all of that—to repudiate the cult of feminism altogether and turn your back upon it for the rest of eternity?
Well you've come to the right place my friend, because we're looking for people just like you! The non-feminist revolution is now recruiting qualified moles, rats, finks, rat-finks, renegades, double agents, infiltrators, provocateurs, fifth-columnists, snoops, snitches, spies and flies-on-the-wall!
That's right: traitors, turncoats, informants, and "sources" of every description.
There is no end to the services you may perform for the revolution, and no telling how far your career path may eventually take you.
But before you proclaim your apostasy to the world, think twice, and consider the advantages of your present situation. Then, consider keeping your mouth shut rather than burning your bridges. As long as you've got your insider's position of trust within your present peer group, why not milk it for all it's worth, for the benefit of your new peer group? Eh..? Does that sound like it would be a kick?
Remember that people do this sort of thing all the time. There is nothing irregular or scandalous about renouncing your loyalty to a peer group which you have outgrown: history furnishes example upon example in this field, and there is no reason why you shouldn't get a piece of that very same action yourself! Indeed, you should congratulate yourself for having a MIND, for seeing the truth of matters at long last, and for acting upon what your revitalized understanding has shown you to be the actual state of things.
Therefore count yourself lucky, count yourself blessed, that you had the good sense to turn your back upon that shit-hole cult, and to embrace once more a free and honest way of life! Lament not, that you have wasted so much of your life, but rather rejoice that you may now "recycle" that waste, and redeem it, and make it a source of strength, wisdom, and shrewdly informed policy in your new vocation.
So again I say, don't be in a too-big hurry to publicly bid adieu to the old lifeways. For, once you have made that open breach, once you have "outed" yourself to your soon-to-be former peers, the undercover trade will no longer be an option. So, consider not blowing your cover — at least for a while.
Of course, once having announced yourself, you may then be of service in a different but equally useful manner. By being an open renegade—flaunting this with passion and conviction—you bear witness, in the world's eye, to the reprobate character of what you have left behind. The impact of such a testimony upon the public mind (or a number of comparable testimonies) can be quite powerful, generating a moral updraft which emboldens more and more people to make a similar decision.
Whether you stay undercover or whether you break surface, either way, I could highly recommend that you take up blogging. This would be, for starters, an entirely logical and altogether natural pulpit for the cyber-age. It is also a way to get the best of both worlds, for you can blog anonymously and leave a narrative of your undercover activities, with suitable ellipsis, for the world to enjoy—and your so-called peer group will be none the wiser.
Once more, for those who desire the undercover trade, a number of creative options are available, to wit: moles, rats, finks, rat-finks, renegades, double agents, infiltrators, provocateurs, fifth-columnists, snoops, snitches, spies and flies-on-the-wall! So which would you rather be: a rat, a fink, or . . . a rat-fink? Or, would provocateur or fifth-columnist be more likely to hit the spot for you? Ahh. . . decisions, decisions! Makes you feel like a donkey starving between several bales of hay, doesn't it?
Most generic, and spanning of all categories, would be "Source". It is a simple occupation; all you must do is share information. And how easy is THAT? Well, consider the following:
fidelbogen@earthling.net
It is called the Sacred E-mail Address. The 'earthling' part signals both our point of origin and the location of our feet—the latter, on the ground.
Fear not; don't be bashful; the Sacred E-mail Address will not bite.
All right. Maybe you have cocked your ear to the buzz in the faculty lounge. Or you might be hip to the jive over at the Feminist-Subjectivist Society, or the scuttlebutt down at the Wild Wimynz Navel-Gazing Co-op. (Man, the zeitgeist is everywhere—you never know where it might pop up next!) Been to a conference lately? What did they really gab about in those breakaway groups? And how about those members-only feminist blogs and web forums—got access? Screenshots are delicious; PDFs are dandy! Got tenure in feminized academia? There must be academic articles floating around which the general public ain't supposed to know about! And memos? Don't even get me started!
You see, information—even critically useful information—sprouts in the most unforeseen crevices of the universe, and you should never underestimate the value of your own particular listening post. So get busy and support the Non-Feminist Revolution with those rich and varied intelligence reports that you have gathered like nectar from many blossoms. The revolutionary data-jaws are gaping wide to crunch down anything you shovel into them. And you know perfectly well how very badly you want to betray feminism, since you know all too well how badly feminism has betrayed YOU. . . don't you? Of course you do! ;)
So whoever you are, and whatever you are, do what you can to weaken their world—to rot it, to make it disintegrate, to make it crumble. And if you feel you are not the man or woman for the job, then kindly pass along a link to this post to anybody who, in your considered opinion, might benefit from reading it. (URL: http://tinyurl.com/mumfoz)
Go now, and serve the Revolution.
fidelbogen@earthling.net
~Fidelbogen, SIPM-NFR~
The Non-Feminist Revolution is now hiring!
Are you an erstwhile Radical Feminist, or feminist of any grade at all, who has undergone a dramatic conversion experience or paradigm-shift? Do you look back on your former life through a greasy, speckled lens of nausea—as on a binge of shameful intoxication from which you have finally awakened with a ghastly hangover? Are you now ready to say good riddance to all of that—to repudiate the cult of feminism altogether and turn your back upon it for the rest of eternity?
Well you've come to the right place my friend, because we're looking for people just like you! The non-feminist revolution is now recruiting qualified moles, rats, finks, rat-finks, renegades, double agents, infiltrators, provocateurs, fifth-columnists, snoops, snitches, spies and flies-on-the-wall!
That's right: traitors, turncoats, informants, and "sources" of every description.
There is no end to the services you may perform for the revolution, and no telling how far your career path may eventually take you.
But before you proclaim your apostasy to the world, think twice, and consider the advantages of your present situation. Then, consider keeping your mouth shut rather than burning your bridges. As long as you've got your insider's position of trust within your present peer group, why not milk it for all it's worth, for the benefit of your new peer group? Eh..? Does that sound like it would be a kick?
Remember that people do this sort of thing all the time. There is nothing irregular or scandalous about renouncing your loyalty to a peer group which you have outgrown: history furnishes example upon example in this field, and there is no reason why you shouldn't get a piece of that very same action yourself! Indeed, you should congratulate yourself for having a MIND, for seeing the truth of matters at long last, and for acting upon what your revitalized understanding has shown you to be the actual state of things.
Therefore count yourself lucky, count yourself blessed, that you had the good sense to turn your back upon that shit-hole cult, and to embrace once more a free and honest way of life! Lament not, that you have wasted so much of your life, but rather rejoice that you may now "recycle" that waste, and redeem it, and make it a source of strength, wisdom, and shrewdly informed policy in your new vocation.
So again I say, don't be in a too-big hurry to publicly bid adieu to the old lifeways. For, once you have made that open breach, once you have "outed" yourself to your soon-to-be former peers, the undercover trade will no longer be an option. So, consider not blowing your cover — at least for a while.
Of course, once having announced yourself, you may then be of service in a different but equally useful manner. By being an open renegade—flaunting this with passion and conviction—you bear witness, in the world's eye, to the reprobate character of what you have left behind. The impact of such a testimony upon the public mind (or a number of comparable testimonies) can be quite powerful, generating a moral updraft which emboldens more and more people to make a similar decision.
Whether you stay undercover or whether you break surface, either way, I could highly recommend that you take up blogging. This would be, for starters, an entirely logical and altogether natural pulpit for the cyber-age. It is also a way to get the best of both worlds, for you can blog anonymously and leave a narrative of your undercover activities, with suitable ellipsis, for the world to enjoy—and your so-called peer group will be none the wiser.
Once more, for those who desire the undercover trade, a number of creative options are available, to wit: moles, rats, finks, rat-finks, renegades, double agents, infiltrators, provocateurs, fifth-columnists, snoops, snitches, spies and flies-on-the-wall! So which would you rather be: a rat, a fink, or . . . a rat-fink? Or, would provocateur or fifth-columnist be more likely to hit the spot for you? Ahh. . . decisions, decisions! Makes you feel like a donkey starving between several bales of hay, doesn't it?
Most generic, and spanning of all categories, would be "Source". It is a simple occupation; all you must do is share information. And how easy is THAT? Well, consider the following:
fidelbogen@earthling.net
It is called the Sacred E-mail Address. The 'earthling' part signals both our point of origin and the location of our feet—the latter, on the ground.
Fear not; don't be bashful; the Sacred E-mail Address will not bite.
All right. Maybe you have cocked your ear to the buzz in the faculty lounge. Or you might be hip to the jive over at the Feminist-Subjectivist Society, or the scuttlebutt down at the Wild Wimynz Navel-Gazing Co-op. (Man, the zeitgeist is everywhere—you never know where it might pop up next!) Been to a conference lately? What did they really gab about in those breakaway groups? And how about those members-only feminist blogs and web forums—got access? Screenshots are delicious; PDFs are dandy! Got tenure in feminized academia? There must be academic articles floating around which the general public ain't supposed to know about! And memos? Don't even get me started!
You see, information—even critically useful information—sprouts in the most unforeseen crevices of the universe, and you should never underestimate the value of your own particular listening post. So get busy and support the Non-Feminist Revolution with those rich and varied intelligence reports that you have gathered like nectar from many blossoms. The revolutionary data-jaws are gaping wide to crunch down anything you shovel into them. And you know perfectly well how very badly you want to betray feminism, since you know all too well how badly feminism has betrayed YOU. . . don't you? Of course you do! ;)
So whoever you are, and whatever you are, do what you can to weaken their world—to rot it, to make it disintegrate, to make it crumble. And if you feel you are not the man or woman for the job, then kindly pass along a link to this post to anybody who, in your considered opinion, might benefit from reading it. (URL: http://tinyurl.com/mumfoz)
Go now, and serve the Revolution.
fidelbogen@earthling.net
~Fidelbogen, SIPM-NFR~



13 Comments:
Most of the time, the only way to kill such a dreadful beast is to expose it's soft underbelly. Help us expose the beast (feminism) for what it truly is. A female supremacy hate group.
How very interesting.
The most powerful weapons is Information/Intelligence.
That or Morale. We already have informants DEEP in the feminist core, with the fems being none the wiser, heck, they are "respected individuals" it's delicious. Oh well, couldn't hurt to get EVERY angle can it?
Excellent thread Fidel...
@Amstrat:
Such "plants", once they are planted, can do more than just gather intelligence. ;)
Although that is certainly a key part of the game.
Between F's comment and AS's comment it sounds to me like you have America in the bag,.. so to speak. I suppose it will dribble down to NZ in time but if you can throw a few bones our way now and then, that could be helpful. Maybe some posts on what is next?
Of course when you change America, you basically change the west;)
.....
NZ doesn't have any secrets any more. It has all come out in the last few years. So I suppose we await the changes.
To: the Anon commenter who made the "crafty devil" statement.
I am keeping your comment behind the curtain, you crafty devil! ;)
But thank you for planting that fruitful seed of thought. That is, if you are actually saying what I believe you believe I was saying. . .
Interesting line of gardening, wot? ;)
That's fine,Fidel.
Thanks again for lending your voice and your talents to the cause.
I'm a huge fan of your work and look forward to your next piece.
PS I'm serious. Also, I thought the way that you wrote it was amusing. Rats. Finks. Rat-finks...
@SavvyD:
It is gratifying to encounter yet another woman who thinks poorly of feminism. It seems there are quite a few of you out there, and which is even better, it seems that more and more of you are willing to speak out openly.
That is a trend which I have been noticing. . .
I will leave your initial (and lengthier) comment behind the curtain, for political reasons. This is, you know, a political blog, and unlike my enemies the feminists, I believe in separating the personal from the political! ;)
Still, I would like to address the substance of your remarks - in a political way, of course.
The grist of the mist is, that we are ALL prisoners in this "prison of feminism", and we must mutually spring OURSELVES - in a jailbreak of historic, epic dimensions!
The sad lament that you sing: that is a song which most of us have felt in our hearts at one time or another.
And you can possibly guess what I am going to say next: Feminism made this happen!
Stated simply: feminism has set a river of poison between men and women, and in consequence, nothing between men and women is, or can be, natural any more. :(
THAT is the prison we must break out of!
And the rest, as we say, is details.
And I won't go on about the details, since I've already done that, and I can't do it all again now in a few paragraphs.
The Big Jailbreak, however, needs to be an organized conspiracy. Or more exactly, a coalition movement.
A lot of people are drifting gradually toward a (grassroots) consensus about the nature of the difficulty. This process needs to be accelerated, so that the movement (the "jailbreak") can go forward with an efficient focus.
In the short term, propaganda outreach will galvanize larger numbers of people. After that comes grassroots consensus-building, followed by social and activist network building - and networking of every kind!
Once the networking stage is reached, it will turbo-boost the propaganda outreach, which will accelerate the networking even more, thereby boosting the propaganda once again, etc,etc...
But alas, Rome wasn't built in a day. . .
Reading over what I have written, I can see that I have addressed your comment only in a political, technical manner. Maybe not the response that you had looked for, but it's the best I can offer because, well... I am a political, technical critter! ;) (And not "Dear Abby".)
So let me wrap it up briefly: the person who can spring you from this prison is YOU - and me, and all of us. . .
In the meantime, we are travelling across the Nefud Desert so as to gain position to attack Aqaba "from the landward side, which cannot be done!. . ."
(Reference to Lawrence of Arabia. See DVD! ;)
@Amstrat:
In reference to your comment, I appreciate your mention of Morale, and its strategic importance.
I call attention to this now because I don't want to give the impression that I had overlooked it! ;)
Oh, any forward-thinker who employs effects, after-effects, and THOSE effects upon other things (people such as yourself) will understand that motivation, personal investment, and overall outlook play a large part in this.
Which is why I think feminism will have a large loss of support soon, and very quickly, like neck whip-lash. When morale falls and that "benefit to cost ratio" hits the red half of the indicator, we'll see an almost chain reaction of feminist abandonment.
The question is: Is it too late?
Thank you, Amstrat. The question "too late for what"? is one we can discuss at leisure. (Interesting question,too!)
For a while I've been subtly calling on older feminists - my own generation to be more precise - to retake control of the movement.
The type of woman presented by feminism today is a pale imitation of what was promised by the libbers.
Get some of the old boilers back in the fold I say.
Meanwhile FB hits upon a mastertroke. Subversion is what's required. It simply isn't safe to go against the sisterhood. They have at their disposal methods of torture never available to the likes of the CIA, the Soviets, the Inquisitors and witch hunters, or indeed the most barbaric of history's regimes.
Just ask Erin Pizzey or Christina Hoff Summers or Wendy McElroy or Murray Strauss or multitudes of others.
Hope you find some conspirators FB.
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home