Here We Go Again: BASIC STUFF Which They are 'Not Trying to Hear'
The following is a comment which I have swiped from a Men's News Daily post—and I have edited this somewhat to enhance the clarity and the "punch". The comment offers a good summary of some important points which plenty of people (you know who you are!) persist in pretending not to hear, or pretending not to understand. (Feminists, are you listening?)
Honestly, how much longer will you go on pretending that you don't get it? How much longer before your rinky-dink charade collapses in a heap of dust and leaves you with only a shit-eating grin to cover your nakedness like a ratty little towel? Seriously now, who the hell do you people think you are fooling?
Feminism is either directly or indirectly to blame for the unconscionable state of affairs described above. Broadly speaking, you feminists are guilty in either one or both of two ways: you have either agitated for the passage of laws making such things possible in the first place. . . OR, you have upheld the continuation of such things through your acquiescence, through your complicity, and through your pigheaded opposition to reform. Whatever the case, you are implicated up to your teeth and you ought to give some serious thought to your future, because a lot of angry people are making plans for you!
Do you think I am full of shit? That I am WRONG about all of this? Then sister, I want you front and center, NOW! I want to hear, straightly and clearly, what the hell you've got to say for yourself! God damn you, answer the charges NOW, and look me squarely in the eye when you are speaking to me!! Mind your tone while you're about it, and don't give me any goddamned SASS!
---------------------------------
Fellow workers in the vineyard, I have given you a demonstration of how we ought to deal with these punks. I am defining a collective moral posture and tonality. As I like to say: don't argue with feminists, tell them things!
Here is more about why we should not waste our time arguing with feminists:
http://tinyurl.com/ykptk56
"Author: Bizzman662We MRAs and similar folk have been bending over backwards for YEARS making our position extremely clear about the things explained above—and about plenty of other issues too! Yes, we have striven mightily to reason with you people, and ours has been a Labor of Hercules! So if you are a feminist, a feminist sympathizer, or a fellow traveller of any kind, then verily you have no excuse! Did you hear me? I said there is no excuse for you any more: you are non-excusable! And that puts you in a bad position to dictate terms to US!
"Comment:
"Just something funny I noticed over the long holiday weekend:
"MTV 2 examples:
"Jersey Shore: a woman gets knocked out at a bar by a man (100% wrong, by the way), so they blacked out the punch. Right after the show a Public Service Announcement came on about an "Abuse Hotline" and how to contact someone if you're in an abusive relationship.
"Teen Moms: a 'teen mom' gets REALLY MAD at her man—punches him, slaps him, throws him against the wall, punches him again. No blacking out the scene, and no Public Service Announcement at the end of the show.
"Just a GLARING example of where we are, as men, in America today: DV used as an ATOM BOMB in divorce proceedings; child support set so high that if you lose your job, suspended driver's license and prison are right around the corner; contempt for past due child support but NO contempt for violation of visitation; fathers turned into "visitors" after divorce rather than keeping the title of FATHER.
"And the Media glorifies DV when it's a woman hitting a man. Watch the Bud Light 'Too Heavy Too Light' Ads. Nancy Grace makes me want to puke; Dr. Phil is run by feminists; Fox News says NOTHING about the destruction of FATHERS via DV "silver bullets" in Family Court which take the FATHER OUT (literally), and create FATHERLESS homes that are now at levels that should shame those in office who create these 'ball busting' laws in the first place.
"Think about it this way:
"1. Wife wants a divorce.
"2. Wife gets an attorney.
"3. Attorney tells her to cry DV so as to get full custody.
"4. Man charged with DV, normally with NO violence involved but just a word: 'afraid'.
"5. Now man gets higher CS/Alimony payments due to getting 'parenting time' two weekends a month, thus making him a 'visitor' and not a FATHER.
"6. Man finds it hard to get or keep gainful employment due the the DV situation.
"7. As a result, man falls behind on CS/Alimony.
"8. Mother violates the parenting time but the only solution for the man is about 10k for an attorney to enforce it—but he can't pay CS so how can he pay for that?
"9. Man is picked up, charged with contempt, thrown in prison, and his life as he knew it is over.
"10. Branded as a 'deadbeat': his children will not know him, and will grow to hate him out of the mothers spite.
"That, in a nutshell, is the 'Game' which the feminists and O.J. Simpson have created for us. It makes too much money for the state and is too ingrained in our legal system to change."
------------------------
See all comments on this post here:http://tinyurl.com/yl3xkvu
Honestly, how much longer will you go on pretending that you don't get it? How much longer before your rinky-dink charade collapses in a heap of dust and leaves you with only a shit-eating grin to cover your nakedness like a ratty little towel? Seriously now, who the hell do you people think you are fooling?
Feminism is either directly or indirectly to blame for the unconscionable state of affairs described above. Broadly speaking, you feminists are guilty in either one or both of two ways: you have either agitated for the passage of laws making such things possible in the first place. . . OR, you have upheld the continuation of such things through your acquiescence, through your complicity, and through your pigheaded opposition to reform. Whatever the case, you are implicated up to your teeth and you ought to give some serious thought to your future, because a lot of angry people are making plans for you!
Do you think I am full of shit? That I am WRONG about all of this? Then sister, I want you front and center, NOW! I want to hear, straightly and clearly, what the hell you've got to say for yourself! God damn you, answer the charges NOW, and look me squarely in the eye when you are speaking to me!! Mind your tone while you're about it, and don't give me any goddamned SASS!
---------------------------------
Fellow workers in the vineyard, I have given you a demonstration of how we ought to deal with these punks. I am defining a collective moral posture and tonality. As I like to say: don't argue with feminists, tell them things!
Here is more about why we should not waste our time arguing with feminists:
http://tinyurl.com/ykptk56
posted by Fidelbogen at 2:20 PM
3 Comments:
I love this blog.
A few wise-cracks:
The women (and men) passing these laws (or at least in favor of them) might not label themselves as feminists.
There is a female personality that I like to call the "entitlement princess". This is a woman who believes that since she is a woman, she deserves more than the average man does. She believes that she can do no wrong in a relationship - I am sure you are familiar with these women, so I will not elaborate further.
"And the Media glorifies DV when it's a woman hitting a man".
I have met women (more than 60 in 2006 - just to do my own "women's studies") - I said it before, they have had their heads filled with ideas that men used to be extremely abusive towards women in days past. A good example of this is the perversion of the phrase "rule of thumb". They believe that both of their grandfathers regularly beat their grandmothers etc...
These women feel it is their civic duty to exact revenge for things done in the past (things which never actually happened).
That is, when they see a woman hitting a man, they feel it is somehow exacting revenge for all the beatings women had to endure in days past.
A good example of this in practice is the youtube video "reactions to female-on-male violence".
One woman actually has the attitude "you go girl" when she sees a woman hitting a man.
I understand that feminists are an evil...
I just think that some women (and men), are just as bad. If they were asked if they were a feminist, they would most likely respond with "NO!"
I guess I just object to labels.
I prefer to categorize people based on their actions, attitudes, beliefs etc...
Sorry for rambling.
@ScareCrow:
Not to worry, you ramble well; there is method and discipline to it.
"I just think that some women (and men), are just as bad. If they were asked if they were a feminist, they would most likely respond with "NO!"".
I have addressed what I think you are talking about in an old, old post, HERE:
There is More to Feminism Than Feminism
Feminists ranted about Chris Brown striking back at Rhianna, while ignoring the fact that she initiated the DV by punching and kicking him while he was driving.
Keep this in mind as you read this;
Entertainer and anti-DV crusader Mary J. Blige punches husband at record release party
http://news.mensactivism.org/node/14485
Mary J. Blige beats up her husband - deafening silence from MSM and DV advocates
http://news.mensactivism.org/node/14488
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home