The female-supremacist hate movement called 'feminism' must be opened to the disinfecting sunlight of the world's gaze and held to a stern accounting for its grievous transgressions.
posted by Fidelbogen at 3:31 PM
fidelbogen@earthling.net
 |
 |
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Here are some photos I took in eastern Washington state, USA, to give you some of that spatial feeling we males enjoy!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"One doeth good to oneself by being contented with simple things and free from craving for worldly posessions."
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Four-fifths of the troubles in this life could be avoided, if people would just sit down and keep still."~Calvin Coolidge - U.S. President No. 30~
"Live simply, that others may simply live."
~M. Gandhi ~
13 Comments:
In more despondent news; I found another self-imposed eunuch's website here..
http://guysguidetofeminism.blogspot.com/
I hope I linked that correctly; to be so young and vibrant, and yet so inept with technology!
@TransMort:
I visited that blog, and left a comment on the 'Slice of Life' post.
Heh, you were too cordial in that comment, fidel!
Or, were you just employing your methodology of non-engagement in argument with the Feminists?
By the way, that's some pretty despicable treatment you've received just ambulating the streets :(
@TransMort:
Cordial? Tired and bored would be more like it!
There's no law says you gotta yell at your enemy. That is just SO predictable.
Imagine some dangerous wild animal such as...for example, a wolverine . . . acting in your presence like a tame domestic critter for no apparent reason.
It would psych you out...wouldn't it?
I once had the honor to see a wolverine in the wild, which was a mighty fine "see", since they are rarely seen by anybody, ever!
This one was crossing a meadow in the moonlight, on Lost Lake plateau near Seward, Alaska.
Must have been about 30 yards from where I was standing.
"There's no law says you gotta yell at your enemy. That is just SO predictable."
One can rebuke an adversary without being callous or confrontational.
"Imagine some dangerous wild animal such as...for example, a wolverine . . . acting in your presence like a tame domestic critter for no apparent reason.
It would psych you out...wouldn't it?"
True, but your presence will not immediately be detected as deleterious in the same way as the wolf. Only upon interjecting of their own will, will they discover you as an enemy. But it is too late. Your neutral comment and immediately neutral first appearance has inculcated their minds with your moniker within normativity to some extent. They cannot be but so malignant as the brief narrative of your existence has too may shades of gray... hence there is nothing to "psych out".
"I once had the honor to see a wolverine in the wild, which was a mighty fine "see", since they are rarely seen by anybody, ever!"
You always struck me as a noble man. Engulfed in an aura of amaranths. Your enemies seek your approval. Even thanatos must supplicate.
At any rate, I also found the post 'Happy to announce our new affiliation with XY' disgusting. I looked at the website; funny to see some usual subjects- Flood and Schwyzer amongst others. I didn't discern Mr. Deutsch- what a pity!
Really though, it's quite degrading and demoralizing to see such a copious number of men engage in such palpable self-loathing, and then, to hear them talk about "educating" (i.e. shaming) innocent boys with such misandry, which will only vitiate their self-worth, and purloin their humanity is absolutely infuriating. Sigh.
Umm... >.>
What was at "DeviantArt"?
Yeap, that's a blog I won't care to frequent
@Amstrat:
At DeviantArt?
Nothing much, just the saying "out there be monsters", followed by a link to CF.
It was amusing and, in a perverse way, flattering.
@TransMort:
I revisited the blog in question,looked further into it, and see that it is worse than it appeared the first time, when I didn't get much beyond the second post. SO. . in retrospect, if I had my comment to do over again, I would have curled my lip just a tad and let a bit of fang gleam."
As for XYonline: I am already acquainted with that snake-pit quite sufficiently, thank you very much!
@Trent13:
You say that you won't care to frequent that blog, BUT. . . you know that you should!
It is like "eating your asparagus", so be a good kid, heh heh heh! ;)
Here is something interesting;
Human Y Chromosome Evolving Faster Than Expected
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/science/genetics/article6987092.ece
Are we surprised men? I think not.
No, seriously, when I start reading that crap I start get nauseated and then I get to the point where I am sure my head is going to explode from the full frontal assault of stupid. I can't take it! And I wonder too, given that so many conversations with feminists end up jacked up beyond belief because of their emotional misuse and redefining of words (is their a word for that?), spewing them out like offal every time someone goes against their thesis, can any change be effected via commenting on a pro-feminist blog? I really doubt it, they'll just gang up on the person and hope to eat them alive and right off the blog. And I don't give too many people credit to be discerning and discriminating when it comes reading stuff in favor of the patriarchy. Men and women alike today have been programmed (literally, by the media, and every other avenue of learning) to automatically assume that women are in the right, are being victimized some how, some way,and the red herring insults are justified. So it's futile to deal with them on their ground - that brick wall that has been spoken of before.
@ trent13
"And I wonder too, given that so many conversations with feminists end up jacked up beyond belief because of their emotional misuse and redefining of words (is their a word for that?)"
The general term for such is equivocation, which is simply the totality of possible aggregates of rhetorical mendaciousness.
"So it's futile to deal with them on their ground - that brick wall that has been spoken of before."
This kind of utilitarianism is rather braying to me; truth in-and-of-itself is worth fighting for. But even if one does rescind this, you never know what neutral observer could come across the article, and if they see your articulate, rational, empathetic rebuttals to their erroneous claims and ideas, you could alter their viewpoints to lean more towards our side. Or at least plant a seed...
Here's a "monster" story I just found... ;-)
Daily Mail (UK): Businessman sues British Airways 'for treating men like perverts'. Right on.
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home