All Right: Some Stuff to Read

A couple of items.

First, nip on over to The Spearhead for a look at the following post, and especially the reader comments which follow. (I even left one myself!):

www.the-spearhead.com/2010/08/22/comment-from-a-feminist-attorney/

I call this to your attention, because I find it interesting that the most evil and dangerous sector of the entire feminist empire (feminist jurisprudence) is now "looking at us looking at them". That is, they are aware that we are aware of them; that our collective political attention is laser-focused upon their sector specifically and upon what their sector is doing in the larger scheme of things. Yes. . . even to the point of making their individual names known! They now know that we now know this of them, and they have made known to us that they know that we know this of them! The ante spirals up and up, does it not? And the presence of Our People in their proximity becomes a growing possibility. . . yes? I am sure that this cannot have failed to have crossed the mind of the feminist attorney who commented at the Spearhead.

The reader discussion, of course, wandered a bit off-topic. However, it wandered interestingly, and it makes informative reading if you aim to be "cutting edge" about the present state of the psychological game in MRA land. Critical thought trends, issues of significance, and the accompanying controversies, are here laid out for your consideration.

Next, you'll want to download a copy of the following excellent 95-page PDF:

http://tinyurl.com/ddtrpv

You will see that this Obama administration report recaps what we already know (from Warren Farrell and other sources) about the so-called gender wage gap -- or more accurately, the PAY gap:

". . . despite these gains the raw wage gap continues to be used in misleading ways to advance public policy agendas without fully explaining the reasons behind the gap. The purpose of this report is to identify the reasons that explain the wage gap in order to more fully inform policymakers and the public. . . . . . The major findings are: There are observable differences in the attributes of men and women that account for most of the wage gap. Statistical analysis that includes those variables has produced results that collectively account for between 65.1 and 76.4 percent of a raw gender wage gap of 20.4 percent, and thereby leave an adjusted gender wage gap that is between 4.8 and 7.1 percent. . . . Research also suggests that differences not incorporated into the model due to data limitations may account for part of the remaining gap. . . Although additional research in this area is clearly needed, this study leads to the unambiguous conclusion that the differences in the compensation of men and women are the result of a multitude of factors and that the raw wage gap should not be used as the basis to justify corrective action. Indeed, there may be nothing to correct. The differences in raw wages may be almost entirely the result of the individual choices being made by both male and female workers."

Feminism, as we know, depends on a number of whopping lies, or at least highly-contested stories, to prop itself up and justify its own continued existence as an ideology and as a movement. And the best overall strategy that we as counter-feminists could employ, is to hammer away at a few narrowly selected issues that will effectively lay bare the lying nature of feminism as a whole. The pay gap, false accusation of rape, and phony DV statistics are three items which straightway recommend themselves. Such rhetorical discipline will pound our central message quickly and efficiently into the mind of the silent majority, and serve to collapse the structural framework of feminist credibility. After this, we can swoop in and make the more subtle things clear to a "neutral" public which is now effectively primed to understand them.

Enjoy the rest of your day! :)