The Elements of Rhetorical Discipline
- Part 2
In the foregoing installment of this series, I introduced the root metaphor which the art of rhetorical discipline conceptually grows from, namely, that of grappling points. I will next examine, each in turn, the spiritual and political foundations for rhetorical discipline as an effective real-world practice. In sum, the necessary mental preconditions.
First, I will speak of the spiritual foundation of our discipline.
Rhetoric is, if nothing else, a matter of presentation. And in the art of rhetorical discipline, the self-presentation of the operator becomes a business of paramount importance -- verily, a disciplined craft unto itself.
Yes, it all begins with you. Your self-presentation grows organically from your foundational pattern of engagement with the world. Understand therefore, that if your foundational pattern of engagement is an overmastering desire for self-expression, then your rhetorical posture at the outset will be one of weakness -- as a house built on crumbling sand.
Self-expression, so-called, is both pernicious and unnecessary. Mind you, we understand that self is an excellent thing, and worthy of enhancement. We encourage self. We likewise understand that expression is an excellent thing, and worthy of considered attention to its finer principles. We encourage expression. Yet we understand as a precondition to all of this, that "self" can never truly be "expressed" at all, but rather comes into being precisely as a co-product of expression. The reason that "self" cannot be expressed, is that it does not even exist in the first place until "expression" makes it exist.
So in the course of your expression, it is not "self", but something entirely ELSE that you should hope to personify -- namely, a matured and efficacious engagement with the business at hand, whatever that business might be. And from precisely this matured engagement, your "self" at last emerges, as a consequence of such engagement. But when you try to express "self" beforehand, as a willed project, you put the horse behind the wagon where it doesn't belong. This overmastering urge for self-expression both triggers, and is triggered by, a defective engagement with the business at hand -- it is a chicken-and-egg feedback loop which stokes itself continually, generating, finally, a very paltry kind of "self".
Conclusion: let the governing purpose behind all your speech be, that you wish to facilitate the business at hand. Frame your communication with that thought uppermost. This is LIFE advice, good for rhetorical discipline and a host of other things.
The present teaching distills itself into a practical maxim, namely, that you must kill the babble reflex. By babble reflex, I mean the urge to talk a lot, and talk mindlessly, under the prompting of the most wayward, trivial or disordered impulses. When you do this, you are putting random stuff out into the world -- as it were untucked shirttails, or untied shoelaces -- which gives your enemy a handhold for hoisting and hauling you around. In sum, you are projecting grappling points for your enemy's convenience. You oughtn't be so obliging.
The babble reflex arises when 'self-expression' is paramount. And the unbridled urge for self-expression is the mother-lode of all grappling points because, not being entirely controlled by the operator, it soon betrays the operator into the controlling hands of others -- and what else is a grappling point if not a locus of control by others? The maxim to control yourself or be controlled, might equally be stated as control yourself or don't have a self. For "self-expression" relentlessly undermines the bare possibility of having any self to express in the first place. It saps and weakens the self. It empties the vessel. It is a pernicious addiction, a disease of our age, a false god if ever there was, and surely not worthy of your reverence.
Yes, the world is bulging at the seams with people who are almost literally bursting to sing their little song every chance they get, to make their little voice heard by an indifferent universe, above the witless cacophony of others so essentially similar to themselves -- and I can only wonder why they all bother to do this! Entire industries and economic sectors have sprung into existence for the purpose of sucking their blood. But their babble reflex, I conclude, is a flimsy stratagem to outwit death or, at the very least, to anesthetize the dark and chill foreboding of it. But then of course, I don't think they actually think about this at all.
In sum, you need not "express" yourself, but only BE yourself, by your mindfulness of the business at hand, and by your way of communicating that business and that mindfulness. Adhere to this method, and the particular something which is you shall be plainly evident to all in the vicinity. This is not "self-expression". It is rather expression pure and simple-- or self pure and simple -- and it fends for itself. It is not your job to see to that, so why make extra work for yourself?
There is more which bears consideration. Consider, for example, that expression of any kind -- that is to say, transmission -- makes it more difficult to gather information. When you are talking, you are not listening. When you are putting out, you are not taking in. Hence, you are not gaining knowledge. The royal road to ignorance, accordingly, is the seductive music of your own voice. Enjoy that music by all means, since you will need to cultivate virtuosity on your instrument in order to fine-tune the art of persuasion. But know when to give it a rest and let "George" take over. That is to say, let the other guy be seduced by the music of HIS voice. As the celebrated maxim of Jesus Christ teaches us, it is more blessed to give than to receive. So let the other guy -- especially if he happens to be your enemy! -- reap the blessing of giving you more information than he is recieving.
Rhetorical discipline means crafting your communication with conscious will and purpose . . . yes? And crafting your communication includes crafting your silence . . yes?
All of this will develop in you the vital faculty of intuition -- to wit: compiled observation. I mean, that the accumulated force of all you have taken in, stored as a reservoir in your subconscious mind, will arrive in a flash of instantaneous seeing-and-knowing, just when the moment requires it. This might take the form of a nameless "insight" to guide you silently toward a correct judgment, or then again it might arrive as a pearl of wisdom that rolls casually from your lips during a mundane conversation. But none of this comes to the babbling fool, so . . . don't be a babbling fool!
In conclusion, please be aware that the present teaching is intended as a meditation-practice exercise for continual application in the realm of daily life. In the end, you will come to know what it means to drive your own car. And what is equally important, this teaching will force you to understand that you have BRAKES!
Nothing in the present treatise should be understood as moral instruction, or moralism of any kind. It is not moralism, but pragmatism. Purely and simply, it is power. Moreover, it is scalable power, with application to both macrocosm and microcosm.
The next installment in this series will address the political foundation of our discipline.
First, I will speak of the spiritual foundation of our discipline.
Rhetoric is, if nothing else, a matter of presentation. And in the art of rhetorical discipline, the self-presentation of the operator becomes a business of paramount importance -- verily, a disciplined craft unto itself.
Yes, it all begins with you. Your self-presentation grows organically from your foundational pattern of engagement with the world. Understand therefore, that if your foundational pattern of engagement is an overmastering desire for self-expression, then your rhetorical posture at the outset will be one of weakness -- as a house built on crumbling sand.
Self-expression, so-called, is both pernicious and unnecessary. Mind you, we understand that self is an excellent thing, and worthy of enhancement. We encourage self. We likewise understand that expression is an excellent thing, and worthy of considered attention to its finer principles. We encourage expression. Yet we understand as a precondition to all of this, that "self" can never truly be "expressed" at all, but rather comes into being precisely as a co-product of expression. The reason that "self" cannot be expressed, is that it does not even exist in the first place until "expression" makes it exist.
So in the course of your expression, it is not "self", but something entirely ELSE that you should hope to personify -- namely, a matured and efficacious engagement with the business at hand, whatever that business might be. And from precisely this matured engagement, your "self" at last emerges, as a consequence of such engagement. But when you try to express "self" beforehand, as a willed project, you put the horse behind the wagon where it doesn't belong. This overmastering urge for self-expression both triggers, and is triggered by, a defective engagement with the business at hand -- it is a chicken-and-egg feedback loop which stokes itself continually, generating, finally, a very paltry kind of "self".
Conclusion: let the governing purpose behind all your speech be, that you wish to facilitate the business at hand. Frame your communication with that thought uppermost. This is LIFE advice, good for rhetorical discipline and a host of other things.
The present teaching distills itself into a practical maxim, namely, that you must kill the babble reflex. By babble reflex, I mean the urge to talk a lot, and talk mindlessly, under the prompting of the most wayward, trivial or disordered impulses. When you do this, you are putting random stuff out into the world -- as it were untucked shirttails, or untied shoelaces -- which gives your enemy a handhold for hoisting and hauling you around. In sum, you are projecting grappling points for your enemy's convenience. You oughtn't be so obliging.
The babble reflex arises when 'self-expression' is paramount. And the unbridled urge for self-expression is the mother-lode of all grappling points because, not being entirely controlled by the operator, it soon betrays the operator into the controlling hands of others -- and what else is a grappling point if not a locus of control by others? The maxim to control yourself or be controlled, might equally be stated as control yourself or don't have a self. For "self-expression" relentlessly undermines the bare possibility of having any self to express in the first place. It saps and weakens the self. It empties the vessel. It is a pernicious addiction, a disease of our age, a false god if ever there was, and surely not worthy of your reverence.
Yes, the world is bulging at the seams with people who are almost literally bursting to sing their little song every chance they get, to make their little voice heard by an indifferent universe, above the witless cacophony of others so essentially similar to themselves -- and I can only wonder why they all bother to do this! Entire industries and economic sectors have sprung into existence for the purpose of sucking their blood. But their babble reflex, I conclude, is a flimsy stratagem to outwit death or, at the very least, to anesthetize the dark and chill foreboding of it. But then of course, I don't think they actually think about this at all.
In sum, you need not "express" yourself, but only BE yourself, by your mindfulness of the business at hand, and by your way of communicating that business and that mindfulness. Adhere to this method, and the particular something which is you shall be plainly evident to all in the vicinity. This is not "self-expression". It is rather expression pure and simple-- or self pure and simple -- and it fends for itself. It is not your job to see to that, so why make extra work for yourself?
There is more which bears consideration. Consider, for example, that expression of any kind -- that is to say, transmission -- makes it more difficult to gather information. When you are talking, you are not listening. When you are putting out, you are not taking in. Hence, you are not gaining knowledge. The royal road to ignorance, accordingly, is the seductive music of your own voice. Enjoy that music by all means, since you will need to cultivate virtuosity on your instrument in order to fine-tune the art of persuasion. But know when to give it a rest and let "George" take over. That is to say, let the other guy be seduced by the music of HIS voice. As the celebrated maxim of Jesus Christ teaches us, it is more blessed to give than to receive. So let the other guy -- especially if he happens to be your enemy! -- reap the blessing of giving you more information than he is recieving.
Rhetorical discipline means crafting your communication with conscious will and purpose . . . yes? And crafting your communication includes crafting your silence . . yes?
All of this will develop in you the vital faculty of intuition -- to wit: compiled observation. I mean, that the accumulated force of all you have taken in, stored as a reservoir in your subconscious mind, will arrive in a flash of instantaneous seeing-and-knowing, just when the moment requires it. This might take the form of a nameless "insight" to guide you silently toward a correct judgment, or then again it might arrive as a pearl of wisdom that rolls casually from your lips during a mundane conversation. But none of this comes to the babbling fool, so . . . don't be a babbling fool!
In conclusion, please be aware that the present teaching is intended as a meditation-practice exercise for continual application in the realm of daily life. In the end, you will come to know what it means to drive your own car. And what is equally important, this teaching will force you to understand that you have BRAKES!
Nothing in the present treatise should be understood as moral instruction, or moralism of any kind. It is not moralism, but pragmatism. Purely and simply, it is power. Moreover, it is scalable power, with application to both macrocosm and microcosm.
The next installment in this series will address the political foundation of our discipline.



13 Comments:
Fidelbogen,
This stuff isn't just rhetorical advice; this is life advice. You've basically nailed the problem of narcissistic alienation that lands so many people in therapy.
As for the subject of rhetoric, I think the only thing missing here is some concrete examples. I am well aware that these are hard to remember (or concoct) off-the-cuff, but as a neophyte I think one or two (for instance one illustrating a "grappling point" and how it can be turned on you) would be extremely helpful.
All my best.
@Mike:
I think that the issue you have raised might be addressed in later installments of the series.
In the meantime, I will be editing the present post to add a few more things that I shouldn't have forgotten to include.
I agree with Mike. This is brilliance on levels beyond counter-feminism.
This work is beyond brilliant, Fidelbogen. I look forward to what you wish to add to it. I did download all of the podcasts you worked to create. I made the mistake of googling the link you posted (not a good habit). I copied and pasted it to the address bar and brought up the page with all of the podcasts. I have them saved on a zip drive. I will buy another zip drive and copy them onto it. The second zip drive will be kept in a more secure location. I'm still enjoying and sharing them. I'm trying to find a way to burn them onto CD so others, who don't have a computer, can listen to them anytime. Even though I'm a member of the working poor, I have learned there are ways around many problems so, I will find a way of doing what I need to do; create audio CDs of the podcasts so I can more easily share what I learn. This should recruit more workers, of quality, to the vineyards'.
"I have them saved on a zip drive. I will buy another zip drive and copy them onto it. The second zip drive will be kept in a more secure location. I'm still enjoying and sharing them. I'm trying to find a way to burn them onto CD so others, who don't have a computer, can listen to them anytime."
Zip drive? You mean thumb drive (or jump drive), right?
As for burning a CD, you can do that at your local Kinko's, or equivalent. Their workstations will have CD burners built right in! :)
I actually have an old zip drive ... and a few zip disks.
They're crap. I can't believe people ever used these.
"I actually have an old zip drive ... and a few zip disks.
They're crap. I can't believe people ever used these."
I too have an old zip drive and some disks. This technology was fine for its time, but really. . . who nowadays needs a big, clunky zip drive (with 100 mg disks) when you can get a little thingabobber the size of your thumb that plugs into any USB port and holds 4 gigabytes!!
I also can't believe that people ever used manual typewriters! (I have, and the memory of it feels like pure imagination!)
" . . levels beyond counter-feminism."
Yup. That's the whole idea. Sometimes, in order to get a real power grip on something, you need to let go your hold and grab it in a new way from a different level.
Welcome to the brave new field of Collateral Studies (as I shall call it)!
"Zip drive? You mean thumb drive (or jump drive), right?"
I've heard them called all of those names.
Fidelbogen said...
"I have them saved on a zip drive. I will buy another zip drive and copy them onto it. The second zip drive will be kept in a more secure location. I'm still enjoying and sharing them. I'm trying to find a way to burn them onto CD so others, who don't have a computer, can listen to them anytime."
Zip drive? You mean thumb drive (or jump drive), right?
As for burning a CD, you can do that at your local Kinko's, or equivalent. Their workstations will have CD burners built right in! :)
3:26 PM
Thumb drive. Ihear them being called zip drives too. The one I had was a PNY 8gb. The one I just bought is a DURACELL 8gb. It was about thirty dollars @ the wallgreen's pharmacy. I will have to buy another, in case anything happens to this one and, copy everything to it.
@anon12:50:
8 gigs; that's pretty good. I'm not sure what I would do with that much storage on a thumb drive, but one never knows what needs the future might bring.
Heck, you could load a complete operating system onto that, and use it for a boot volume if your internal hard drive crashes.
I wonder if there is a way to daisy-chain those things. Or maybe a USB hub that would let you plug in several at once. .
I know a couple of (male) computer mavens who love to discuss such matters. I'll have to bring it up with them....
There are USB adapters that have up to eight devices, including thumb drives, you can plug devices in. I have one that can handle up to four devices at once. I found it at one of the stores I try to avoid visiting; Wal-Mart.
"I found it at one of the stores I try to avoid visiting; Wal-Mart."
Alack! Such places are getting harder and harder to 'avoid visiting'. We're all prisoners of the (global corporate) system now. So if there is no longer any 'outside' it is time to start subverting from 'inside'.
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home