A YouTube That You Must Watch
Now I will treat you to some of the comments which followed this video on the YouTube channel:
"Robert Connell is still a man. A mutilated mentally ill man to be sure but a man none the less. Connell's notion that he is suddenly female because of surgical intervention, hormone therapy and having his beard removed via electrolysis is so absurd that it beyond my ability to understand the depth of his mental disorder. "Finally, I will treat you to my own words, left as a comment on an article which Hugo Schwyzer published at the Good Men Project website. And no, somehow I don't feel like linking to it. But suffice to say that the article was smug, tendentious, patronizing, pontificating and willfully ignorant:
"Any person who labels herself a "feminist" is participating in the longstanding anti-male agenda of feminism. Regardless of her individual take on what she or he thinks is feminism, they are lending their name to an institution which has scapegoated all males as the wellspring of all women's problems. If I call myself a Nazi because I want to help people in Appalachia no one will care about my philanthropy. The same should apply for feminists."
"If I wanted help, I would not seek help from a masculinity expert who cuts their penis off because they hate being male. It's a wonder why they still pronounce him/her to be a masculinity expert even after this....transformation."
"Hugo Schwyzer has absolutely NO authority to pontificate on the subject of “why guys don’t want to get married”. And don’t you believe for one minute, that he doesn’t know what’s happening. He is being willfully obtuse, selling out normal men everywhere, and poisoning the minds of young people with feminist indoctrination.Mind you, I don't believe for one minute that Hugo Schwyzer has "gender identity disorder" like Robert/Raewyn Connell. I am sure that Hugo has no intention of cutting off his schvanze in order to express his deep-seated contempt for men and maleness. I think that Hugo's problem stems from a rather different source, more connected with his adolescent life experience. And yet, I very readily discern the pragmatic socio-political continuum that links people like Schwyzer with people like Connell. They are part of the same device, the same "conspiracy" if you will. And by their conjoined efforts, they are driving the world toward the same end of the field, if not the identical goalpost.
"Schwyzer is pissing in the face of the whole male population when he writes this kind of garbage.
"The MRAs have been explaining for YEARS why men don’t want to get married. All you must do, is listen. It is not at all hard to figure out. So again, that is why I say that Hugo Schwyzer and people like him are being willfully obtuse: they are pretending not to get it. But deep in their guts they know perfectly well what is really happening. And they are cashing in, building their parasitical careers at the expense of truth, upon a foundation of human misery. At the same time, they are helping to multiply that misery — stashing more and more psychopolitical gunpowder and petrol in the societal basement, toward a catastrophic explosion that cannot fail to occur sooner or later. Yes, truth has a funny way of working its way to the surface eventually. . .
"People like Schwyzer are self-loathing because they are loathsome. And deep in their guts they know this. But they project their self-loathing onto normal men, and try to suck as many of them into into the feminist ideological shithole as they possibly can. Misery loves company, and let me tell you, they are bound to get their wish because things are bound to get miserable as hell in the future.
"Hugo Schwyzer ought to be deeply ashamed for writing this article, but knowing him, I know that he is morally incapable of it."
If you haven't already done so, or even if you have already done so, go take a look at the Swedish documentary which I blogged about a few days ago. Do this while all of the above is still fresh in your memory. For if you wish to truly "see" feminism, you must place certain things side-by-side in your mind so that their organic linkage to each other becomes increasingly difficult to overlook: