The Planetary Reach of Our Movement
It bears repeating that the non-feminist revolution is going global.
Well no, our movement isn't going global -- it always was global. But now, it is growing conscious of its globality, and starting to function with the interconnectivity befitting such a condition.
You have doubtless heard of a pro-male lobbying organization called the NCFM -- or, National Coalition For Men. This group started in the United States, but now it is opening chapters in exotic places like Australia, and Bangalore (India).
Maybe they should call themselves the International Coalition for Men now.
All right, so cue the drumroll. The NCFM is at it again. This time, they want to open a chapter in, of all places . . . Sweden! Yes, you heard that right. Sweden, the most feminazified country on the face of the planet, will have an NCFM chapter IF Carl Augusstson (NCFM liaison for the Republic of Georgia, incidentally!) gets his way. Ahhh....Sweden! Now that is the prize plum in which to plant the NCFM flag, don't you think so?
The following brief article at the NCFM website will get you up to speed on this:
http://ncfm.org/2011/05/action/ncfm-liaison-pursues-establishing-ncfm-chapter-in-sweden/
Oh.. and just how feminazified is Sweden? Review the following classic exposé:
counterfem.blogspot.com/2011/03/swedish-feminism-gutted-good-and-proper.html
Well no, our movement isn't going global -- it always was global. But now, it is growing conscious of its globality, and starting to function with the interconnectivity befitting such a condition.
You have doubtless heard of a pro-male lobbying organization called the NCFM -- or, National Coalition For Men. This group started in the United States, but now it is opening chapters in exotic places like Australia, and Bangalore (India).
Maybe they should call themselves the International Coalition for Men now.
All right, so cue the drumroll. The NCFM is at it again. This time, they want to open a chapter in, of all places . . . Sweden! Yes, you heard that right. Sweden, the most feminazified country on the face of the planet, will have an NCFM chapter IF Carl Augusstson (NCFM liaison for the Republic of Georgia, incidentally!) gets his way. Ahhh....Sweden! Now that is the prize plum in which to plant the NCFM flag, don't you think so?
The following brief article at the NCFM website will get you up to speed on this:
http://ncfm.org/2011/05/action/ncfm-liaison-pursues-establishing-ncfm-chapter-in-sweden/
Oh.. and just how feminazified is Sweden? Review the following classic exposé:
counterfem.blogspot.com/2011/03/swedish-feminism-gutted-good-and-proper.html
posted by Fidelbogen at 1:23 PM
3 Comments:
This is James, long time reader. Just thought I’d throw some fuel on the fire.
You can see a radical feminist in action. Be sure to check out the comments.
http://bevjoradicallesbian.wordpress.com/2011/03/15/bev-jo-radical-lesbian-writing/
@James:
Thank you VERY much for sharing that. Sometimes, I think I have seen it all -- which invariably means I am due for a timely refresher.
I was only able to read approx. 4 screen-scrolls worth of that. . septic bilgewater. . . before I got too burnt out to continue. I mean, after a certain point they make their point, and after that, what's the point?
But I will have a go at it again later, you may be sure. And I will be mining this for ideas for a good long while to come.
I found the following especially telling:
"And they KNOW their desire for violence is part of how they are biologically different from us, in mind and body. Ironically, and tragically, it’s Feminists who are the ones most often claiming that male violence is “socialization.” For years, most Lesbian Feminists agreed with the mainstream media that males were not intrinsically evil, and that their misogyny was a result of socialization – “He raped and killed all those women because he was sexually abused in childhood.” If that was the case, wouldn’t most women be serial killers? Male animals aren’t socialized to rape and kill, but they do. The evidence is there. Men know it. They know they are innately different from females."
This completely trashes the purported pillar of feminist thought -- the idea that "gender" is "constructed".
Yet it reveals something far deeper and more politically insightful, namely, the true inner structure of feminism itself -- the face behind the mask.
The fact is, that feminism has only ONE consistent guiding principle -- namely, the destruction of males and maleness.
But in order to make this happen, they need to pursue several lines of policy concurrently -- and those lines logically contradict each other.
These radical lesbians are OPEN female supremacists -- in other words, the most "pure" form of feminists you will encounter anywhere. And I sincerely appreciate their honesty.
The classic "old school" feminists who preach gender constructivism, are needed in order to break down male space and male power structures by forcefully injecting women among men. But this policy screeches to a halt when it comes time to address the question of women's moral accountability toward men.
That is where the radical bio-essentialists (such as we see here) are standing ready, to carry the ball further down the field and through the goal posts. They are made for this job because they are quite willing to promote the idea that MEN ARE INHERENTLY EVIL, and that women are not morally accountable to them.
Feminists such as these occupy key positions in academia, in various professions and industries, and in government, and they are working diligently to promote the kind of thinking which you see displayed here -- but in a suitably veiled and indirect form, often using the techniques of critical theory to clear the way so that it will become progressively easier to implant such philosophies without raising any eyebrows.
Again, I thank you for sharing.
Some of this shit, I kid you not, would even make Mary Daly blush! :(
I think you'll find that I attempted to use logic in the comments near the bottom. EVERY SINGLE THING Adam Kostakis talks about with the feminist rebuttal occurs here. If you make the comparisons to his lectures and her words you will be able to deconstruct it perfectly.
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home