Marc Rudov Punks a Feminist
His rhetorical discipline is excellent, too! :)
Notice also, at the very end of the segment, where the "feminist" brazenly confirms what we have long known: that "patriarchy" is simply a feminist codeword for male power of any kind. I mean, she makes it plain as day that she wants to get rid of "patriarchy" and (male) supremacy, in order to arrive finally at "a woman's nation". She states that it would be her preference.
We define feminism as "female supremacism." The terms are completely interchangeable in every way, and don't let anybody tell you otherwise.
posted by Fidelbogen at 10:07 PM
12 Comments:
For the sake of absolute fairness, do you know where i can get the rest of the discussion-something might have been cut off at the end.
That being said, the odds of making a recovery from a woman's nation being her preference are pretty slim
". . do you know where i can get the rest of the discussion.."
The only thing I can think of is to check Marc Rudov's website.
Marc Rudov demolishes feminism
with simple logic.
I am hearing this more and more at last. The feminists put ideology above reason above truth.
Feminism is now- a naked hag the wicthes clothes are disintegrating the "equality " cloak is worn out and exposed as a sham a falsehood
The hat the state that covers them is more and more tyrannical.
They ha
The idea that females are morally superior to men predates feminism. And many people who are not feminists still espouse female supremacism (think Sarah Palin or Phyllis Schafly).
I prefer to call feminism the ugly daughter of female supremacism
A woman's nation would be her preference.
In other words - she is a female supremacist.
Case close - as if it weren't closed a long time ago.
I think the only thing that the video demonstrates in the fact that you cannot reason with these people.
For more on female supremacism check out Megan Milanese at http://www.lawsonry.com/891-look-kitten-i-am-too-a-feminist-fauxminism-and-men/ and my response at http://avoiceformen.com/2011/07/15/now-hiring-male-feminist-men-need-not-apply/comment-page-1/#comment-57378.
Megan's description of the ideal male feminist isn't much different than "sit down, shut up, do as your told (by the owmen who know better), castrate yourself, and prepare to be abused." It's full of hypocrasy and double standards.
TDOM
"I prefer to call feminism the ugly daughter of female supremacism."
Which means that feminism gets at least half of its DNA from "mom".
Take away that female-supremacist DNA, and feminism would not be feminism.
Feminism isn't really new at all. It is simply a re-packaging of things that have been with us always.
@Fidelbogen
"Feminism isn't really new at all. It is simply a re-packaging of things that have been with us always."
What things?
Please elaborate.
Thank you.
Your blog is awesome by the way.
'Feminism isn't really new at all. It is simply a re-packaging of things that have been with us always.'
True. What I call "femaleism", the use of females to bolster a waning social power, is a key element of this whole phenomenon. Womens' tyrannical behaviour is a surrogate and a proxy for an established tyranny that can no longer exercise power using traditional means.
Is it weird that I had an argument like this with a dude in a pub last night.
"it would be my preference"
Its women like these that made a generation of young men hate the idea of marriage and the result: a huge spike in unmarried Western women. Enjoy your cats "ladies"!
Ill stick to my asian bride over you anyday (married now 18 years and going strong--she hates feminists.)
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home