Another Prime Example of Feminism Spreading Lies

Ancient Chinese saying: "Feminism spreads lies like a fly spreads germs."

Today, I share another example of good old-fashioned feminist germ-spreading. The adjoined graphic image is part of an ad campaign which ran some time around 2006. So it is not quite up-to-the-minute, but that's all right, since it is timeless. It will do for illustration, because feminism's modus operandi is timeless -- it has not essentially changed because it never essentially changes.

Brotherman, this visual treat has only one purpose: to bully and manipulate you. Just look at that tender, vulnerable snowflake. God damn it, look at her, you insensitive brute!

Never forget, this is the work of an advertising agency. And the ad industry has been refining its craft for years. They're the same people who exploit female bodies in order to sell you fast cars and rot-gut booze. So in the long run, they are exploiting YOU. But this time, they are doing it in a very different way. Here, they exploit a female body in order to exploit you in a compassionate, socially responsible way. And that makes all the god damn difference in the world, doesn't it?

The words to the right say: "Every fourth woman falls victim to domestic violence." And that is where the fun begins, in dead earnest.

How do the feminists get away with this? Easy. They exploit the ruling cultural morality of non-violence against woman in order to foment moral hysteria regarding violence against women.

The ruling cultural morality, you see, is already violently opposed to violence against women. Always has been. And the feminists twist this energy back onto itself, so as to instill their sociological fiction that we live in a culture of anti-female violence. Call it psychic jiu-jitsu. They have so maneuvered the ruling cultural neurosis against itself, that none dare challenge their narrative.

None but a few courageous souls, anyway. . .

And the feminists recruit every possible agent and exploit every possible channel to achieve their purpose. They daub fear and loathing everywhere like a plague bacillus, with never a speck of moral hesitation or compunction about any of their activities. Most of them, you see, are so morally obtuse they cannot possibly comprehend the destructive evil of what they are doing. And yet, not all of them are obtuse. Some of them know perfectly well what they are doing . . .

Let us now consider the case upon its demerits. You see, they slip you the mickey in a very simple way, for when they say "every fourth woman falls victim to domestic violence" they are crossing their fingers behind their backs. The statement is technically accurate, but otherwise it is grossly misleading and paints a wildly false picture of reality. But if you wish to foment moral hysteria, that is exactly what you do. You paint a wildly false picture of reality.

They get their 1-in-4 figure in by inflating the definition of domestic violence as far as they can possibly balloon it. And they achieve this inflation by conflation. That is, they do not disaggregate the various LEVELS of domestic violence, but toss all DV into one statistical kettle.

The great majority of DV is what professionals call "common couple violence", which means nothing worse than the customary spats with an occasional slap, shove, or thrown object to punctuate the yelling. Such disturbance is typically infrequent, and might happen only once in the entire marriage. But as ever, the feminists cook all DV into the same kettle. And then, as you see, they serve up Innocent Bambi in police tape as a side dish.

Serious domestic violence -- the kind leading to injury or even hospitalization -- is statistically rare. But of course, that is too much information for a sound bite, and not effective as feminist propaganda. So they don't tell you about that. Ad professionals know enough to keep it simple and shove Innocent Bambi in your face. And their feminist clients from the DV industry know this too. Can you feel the exploitation?

Finally, let's not forget that according to the best evidence we've got, men and women share the DV guilt pretty near equally. They take turns at being perpetrators, and the split is around 50/50.

Now, notice that we are not greedy. We are quite unlike the feminists, who want the world to think that men commit 95% of all DV. But we are not itching to reverse that script. We don't aim to sell the idea that women commit 95% of all DV. That would not only be be greedy, it would be "misogynistic", wouldn't it? So inasmuch as we value truth more than we value "misogyny", we settle for 50/50. Because it sounds more truthful, don't you think so? And not only truthful, but reasonable . . . yes? Or at least, according to the best evidence we've got.

All right. So when they say "every fourth woman falls victim to domestic violence, " they are telling us only half the story. The other half is, that every fourth MAN falls victim to domestic violence too! That throws a whole different light on things, doesn't it?

Fine. Let us now pull together the principle threads we have laid out in our discussion.

Firstly, that the feminist propagandists have conflated ALL so-called domestic violence, both traumatic and trivial -- and even non-physical -- in order to reach the conclusion that 25% of all women "fall victim" to it.

Secondly, that men too "fall victim" to it, in nearly the same proportions as do women. And I would add that feminists everywhere have massively denied this, and stonewalled against this, and acted violently against people who tried to make this widely known, and generally done their damnedest to prevent this becoming common knowledge.

Finally, there is the matter of Innocent Bambi. Look at her! She has no authentic bearing on what we're talking about, does she? Of course not. She is, in reality, a professional model with a bunch of yellow tape wrapped around her body -- the kind which police use to cordon off a crime scene. This same model did a very extended photo shoot, in a variety of poses. She was likely well paid, and her presence here serves one purpose only; that of an emotional trigger.

Innocent Bambi is meant to implant the thought of violent crime -- the sort of crime where blood-spatters appear on the floor, where chalk lines are drawn, where five or six squad cars pull up outside the house, where detectives mill about. Horrid stuff! Dreadful stuff!

Innocent Bambi is also meant to implant the idea that every fourth woman will end up in such a scene as I've described. Yes, that is the idea meant to be implanted, and the people responsible for this ad campaign, and all feminist propaganda of its kind, god damn well know it!

Oh, and let's not forget that every fourth man might also end up in a scene like I've described. So where is the doe-eyed youth in the yellow tape, eh? Statistically, he would enjoy quite the same odds of being there, but I don't see him. Where the hell is he?

Very well. We have been bludgeoned into absorbing a reality model wildly askew from the true state of things. Certain people, practicing a finely honed craft, have inflicted this by sheer insinuation. In the present case, I grant you that no literal misstatement was made. Yet we are either emotionally coerced into accepting this state of things, or simply duped into it by a procedure bypassing rational thought altogether.

Yes, we have been lied to. The contagion has spread, and the world has become a sicker, dirtier and more dangerous place. So now I want some feminist to get in here and explain what the hell is decent or morally forgivable about that.

Get in here! Right now! Pronto!

Front and center, sister!

Front and center!