Justin Bieber Sings it like it Is
Mind you, not that I give two spits about the young pop singer Justin Bieber, but the significance of certain events does not escape me. The lad is quite popular among people of a certain generational subculture, and he was recently the target of attempted paternity fraud. The attempt failed, and Justin memorialized the experience in a song as the following tabloid article relates. It won't take long at all to read:
Justin Bieber writes song about fraudulent babymomma
What's this got to do with feminism, you ask? Well, feminism has empowered women to do many, many things -- especially things that would hurt or exploit males. Likewise, feminist propaganda and legal activism has generated a cultural climate in which the "deadbeat dad" trope has risen to special prominence -- aye, to a point of moral hysteria! Finally, feminist complicity with the paternity fraud industry is written in blazing letters by anybody who cares to look. I mean, they very clearly don't want paternity fraud to stop happening. Or at least they feel no moral urgency about this, as attested by their waffling, rationalizing behavior whenever the subject arises.
http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/story?id=97079&page=2#.T6NYv7NST08
Very well . . . Justin Bieber's song might just hammer home, in the minds of certain male youngsters, some of the cruel facts of male existence in today's world. And that can only be to the political benefit of the non-feminist revolution. So, on with it!
http://www.wnd.com/2006/02/34861/
Justin Bieber writes song about fraudulent babymomma
What's this got to do with feminism, you ask? Well, feminism has empowered women to do many, many things -- especially things that would hurt or exploit males. Likewise, feminist propaganda and legal activism has generated a cultural climate in which the "deadbeat dad" trope has risen to special prominence -- aye, to a point of moral hysteria! Finally, feminist complicity with the paternity fraud industry is written in blazing letters by anybody who cares to look. I mean, they very clearly don't want paternity fraud to stop happening. Or at least they feel no moral urgency about this, as attested by their waffling, rationalizing behavior whenever the subject arises.
http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/story?id=97079&page=2#.T6NYv7NST08
Very well . . . Justin Bieber's song might just hammer home, in the minds of certain male youngsters, some of the cruel facts of male existence in today's world. And that can only be to the political benefit of the non-feminist revolution. So, on with it!
http://www.wnd.com/2006/02/34861/
posted by Fidelbogen at 9:26 PM
3 Comments:
Re: Paternity Fraud stats
So Razib Khan has a post on how paternity fraud stats (the approx 10%) are a myth.
http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/2012/04/paternity-most-assured/
He claims that 3.7% is more likely and supports using 2 explanations
a) The tables in the first embedded link show a median rate of 1.6% for people with High paternity confidence, and ~10% for people with Unknown paternity confidence, and ~30% for people with Low paternity confidence. Yet Razib argues that the Net would be 3.7% (High+Unknown).
b) some genetics explanation that I dont really have tech knowledge to comprehend.
Any genetics savvy people here to throw some light?
I am currently reading Jared Diamond’s The Third Chimpanzee where he talks about a paternity fraud stat serendipitiously found in the 1940s by a doctor who was doing research on blood groups on a rather random sample of newly born babies and their parents, and the result even there was low-bound of 10%. You will note a comment by 'Anonymous Age 70' at Razib's that seems to refer to the same thing. So I am surprised to see Razib argue otherwise.. he’s a known anti-feminist, anti-left. So, not ideologically driven.
oops.. forgot to subscribe
Aside from all of that, the significant point about paternity fraud is the guy who gets named as daddy, misses the thirty day deadline, and pays child support EVEN IF DNA TESTING RULES OUT PATERNITY.
The law permits such things to happen, and somebody with a thinking mind, who knew exactly what the hell s/he was doing, had to WRITE that law in the first place.
I would like very much to know the name of that person or those persons.
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home