Man Refuses to Have Sex. Woman Tries to Kill Him, then Threatens to Cry Rape
From a recent UK news article:
However, we do NOT live in a state of normality. Things are, in fact, not normal. And the abnormality in question arises from the present state of sexual politics. What I mean to say, is that context matters. And in the context of cultural and institutional misandry, this story becomes "loaded" in a particular manner.
It speaks tons, that women are morally licensed to lie and take advantage of men in such despicable ways as we see here. The drug-addled little alley cat in this story understands perfectly well that the Dark Feminine is given free license in our culture, and she knows just how easy it is to accuse a man of "rape" or attempted rape, and get away with it. So, the episode described here is not sui generis. It did not happen in a vacuum. It happened in a political context, and once again, context matters.
Granted, the given episode was so egregious that truthful justice prevailed. And thank goodness for that!
All right. I realize that the woman in this story has problems, and no doubt has a tormented life history. But in the present political context, I am not bound to feel any sympathy at all. If she is looking for sympathy then, as the spry old adage goes, she can find it in the dictionary between "shit" and "syphilis". And that's all I've got to say about that.
Peace. :-)
A heavy-drinking drug user has been jailed after stabbing a man in the belly because he refused to have sex with her. Joanne Buckley, 29, would not let her victim David Tawes seek medical help after plunging a knife into his abdomen and told him she would say she knifed him because he tried to rape her.My quick thoughts on this: If we lived in a state of "normality", then this would be just another sordid crime story, to make us shake our heads and shudder. That's all it would be.
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2205067/Woman-stabbed-man-refused-sex-threatened-rape-went-hospital-treatment.html#ixzz26qiBnees
However, we do NOT live in a state of normality. Things are, in fact, not normal. And the abnormality in question arises from the present state of sexual politics. What I mean to say, is that context matters. And in the context of cultural and institutional misandry, this story becomes "loaded" in a particular manner.
It speaks tons, that women are morally licensed to lie and take advantage of men in such despicable ways as we see here. The drug-addled little alley cat in this story understands perfectly well that the Dark Feminine is given free license in our culture, and she knows just how easy it is to accuse a man of "rape" or attempted rape, and get away with it. So, the episode described here is not sui generis. It did not happen in a vacuum. It happened in a political context, and once again, context matters.
Granted, the given episode was so egregious that truthful justice prevailed. And thank goodness for that!
All right. I realize that the woman in this story has problems, and no doubt has a tormented life history. But in the present political context, I am not bound to feel any sympathy at all. If she is looking for sympathy then, as the spry old adage goes, she can find it in the dictionary between "shit" and "syphilis". And that's all I've got to say about that.
Peace. :-)
posted by Fidelbogen at 12:30 PM
16 Comments:
Fidelbogen:
Maybe this is a specimen of the 'new normal' that media is always touting.
I have noticed that stories of this kind seem to have been increasing a lot over the last year or so. The Vancouver attacks are another one. Does it seem to you like the feminists and white knights are becoming more violent, both in deed and rhetoric?
I wonder...
How many MRA's are going to blame this man for what happened to him.
Scarecrow:
To be completely fair; contact with women from deeply-ingrained feminist cultures like Britain's generally leads to bad consequences for men. I suppose it could be argued that the man ignored that reality to the point where he brought it himself, but that would be quite a stretch.
Like Fidelbogen mentioned, the feminist culture unleashes the worst and most uncivilised aspects of female behavior on men. But it also has an effective propaganda machine (i.e., the media and public schools) who keep men blind to its realities. The result is that men walk blindly into ambushes like these.
Women of today are actually easy to deal understand - if her mouth is open for more than pleasuring a man, she's lying. Just accept that she will lie, cheat, and everything else - so your job is to out-smart her. It isn't difficult she's a female and lacks your reason, and ability.
Use your advantage. And never make the mistake of thinking of a woman as more than someone who will lie, cheat, steal, and murder to get what she wants because she has been taught that she is OWED what she wants...
Your job is to not give it to her, and use her for your pleasure - they can be trained, but will turn on you if they ever sense fear...
@Anon1030:
Your rhetorical style is not politically efficient, and your declaration of sentiments is not in line with the policy of this blog.
Nevertheless, you are quite welcome to your opinion, and I will not censor you.
However, I would refer you to the four points of rhetorical discipline, which are:
1. Discreet utterance
2. Tonal mastery
3. Narrative frame
4. Message Discipline
One needs to be firing on all four of these cylinders. You are lacking fire altogether on cylinder no. 1, and lacking partly on cylinders 3 and 4.
The complete manual on rhetorical discipline is available at the following link, and I recommend that you study it:
The Practice of Rhetorical Discipline
I might also wonder if you are a feminist provocateur, engaging in false flag tactics. We get a lot of that nowadays, now that the conflict is heating up and entering a new phase. They will do anything they can to prove that non-feminist people are 'violent misogynists', and they love nothing better than to point to words such as yours, in proof of "why the world needs feminism".
But the truth is exactly the reverse. Words such as yours should be cited in proof of why the world does NOT need feminism. "More feminism" will only spawn more of the attitude which you are expressing here. But that is is precisely what the feminists wish to see happening, because it will validate them and pave the way for...that's right, more feminism!
That is 2 so far!
I for one, with all the bravado that anonymity can muster, don't agree that all women are just liars, there certainly are women with integrity, I know some, and everyone here had mothers didn't they, must be some of them don't deserve to be described with the imagery of anon 1030 - if acknowledging that makes the conversation less stimulating for some well, I wonder what you could accomplish here anyway.
I too get the feeling it's so deliberately insulting that it's either a head case or a troll. If you've had a bad time at the expense of feminists, well, some smart guy told me that "feminism is not the world", they just want you to think it is, sadly it's worked with some guys. When you believe you're defeated, you're defeated.
@Anon1030:
The very last thing they want to see, is less of the attitude you are expressing here. They love it when people talk that way, and they can't get enough of it.
@Scarecrow:
I'm not sure what you are talking about.
Could he mean 2 trolls? Wasn't there another such post recently... since they got tired of diddling with the page name?
2 posters on your blog that blamed the man for what happened to him.
"That's 2 so far!"
And my first post:
"How many MRA's are going to blame this man for what happened to him."
Quick!!!!
Cover it up - post like 5 more posts fidelbogen!
Fidelbogen:
Anon 1030 sounded to me more like a typical PUA than a feminist plant. PUAs are also notorious for their lack of any discipline, rhetorical or otherwise.
I'm often accused of being a misogynist myself, because I think that men should not engage in personal relationships with women in feminist cultures. But that's from a purely self-defense standpoint. Feminism is very harmful to women, and its for their benefit too that it should be fought.
P.S> I finally switched to OpenID here, since there are so many anons...
Scarecrow:
I don't see anybody here blaming the man. I posted above as Anons 1017 and 247. Did you see either one of those as blaming the man? If so, how?
"I suppose it could be argued that the man ignored that reality to the point where he brought it himself, but that would be quite a stretch"
I negelected to see the "but that would be quite a stretch" part.
That second anon - after careful analysis... I have decided it makes little or no sense.
So THAT'S ZERO SO FAR!!!!
In my above post, I note that "I know some" women with integrity, which makes it sound a little like claiming to have seen some unicorns, but that's not how I meant it. I have not actually seen any unicorns. Supposedly if you ever do see a unicorn, you shouldn't kill it incidentally, really bad mojo and form.
"If she is looking for sympathy then, as the spry old adage goes, she can find it in the dictionary between "shit" and "syphilis"."
Man where do you get these treasures! Pure gold in my world.
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home