Take a good look at this conglomeration of venn diagrams. (Click to enlarge.) Well all right, take an especially good look at the blue, red and orange circles.. I want you to notice something very particular. Look at the outermost slice of each circle - the parts which don't intersect with feminism at all. Observe how, in all three of these locations, the feminist designer has clumped "anti-feminist" and "neutral" together as if they didn't even merit separate categories.
"Neutral", as you will soon figure out, means nothing other than "non-feminist". This cutting-edge, quasi-radical feminist has instinctively recognized, and expressed for an audience of her peers, what we have long known - that to be neutral or indifferent toward feminism, is of the same effect, for feminism, as to be actively unfriendly toward it. Yes, in the long run, they can no more tolerate you for being not feminist, than for being flat-out anti-feminist. To remain stubbornly non-feminist, come hell or high water, has the same effect on feminism's existence as to be willfully attacking feminism.
And here they acknowledge that they do indeed comprehend this principle - that it makes part of their thinking.
Feminism does not allow the right to exist of people who are not feminist.
To the feminists, you are as much an enemy as the anti-feminists or even the MRAs. I wonder: have they realized that every anti-feminist is ipso-facto a non-feminist, even if the reverse is not true? And have the implications of this dawned upon them?
As feminism continues to spiral through the process of perpetual revolution, it will reach out and attempt to colonize more and more areas of the social fabric. When this happens, more and more "neutral" people will feel the heat and finally realize what is going on. This will make anti-feminists of them, or possibly even counter-feminists. The harvest of souls shall be rich, my fellow workers in the vineyard!
I recommend reading the Jezebel article from which I filched this diagram, here: