Tuesday, January 01, 2013

Weeding Out Politically Unsuitable Women

More and more women are speaking out against feminism and a lot of men in the activated community are acting cynical about about the motives of such women. Such men are voicing fears of  "infiltration" by such women, and are sure that such women are up to no good. I understand what these men are saying and, up to a point, I share their concerns. It is undoubtedly true that an uncontrolled female presence in the wrong sectors will set things back -- and I say this in a spirit of  realism and pragmatism, trusting that others will weigh my sentiments accordingly. However, I cannot agree that openly anti-feminist rhetoric among women is a bad thing. Seriously, if women themselves are denouncing feminism it cannot bode well for feminism, can it?

But I would allow that SOME of these women are plotting to subvert male sovereignty, and hence, the non-feminist revolution as a whole. So I propose a simple method for detecting them and weeding them out. You must monitor every purportedly anti-feminist woman to ascertain that she is walking the pro-male walk, and not simply talking the anti-feminist talk. So question the candidate about the sanctity of male space. If for any reason at all, she bristles at the idea that men should have times and places where women are excluded, you should immediately toss her application onto the reject pile. By contrast, women who are fine with that idea will get a relatively high security clearance, and be groomed as leaders of other women.



Blogger Cybro said...

Females will crash the Men's Movement the same way they crashed everything else. Once they get in they will start demanding men change the way they are. Which was the whole reason men formed a separate community away from females making unrealistic demands on them to begin with. And so the cycle of stupidity from females and men moving away from them will continue until the end of the world.

1:43 PM  
Blogger Fidelbogen said...

The whole purpose of establishing the sanctity of male space as a cultural fixture, is to "nail it to the floor" so that the cycle will have no way to remain in motion.

1:53 PM  
Anonymous Introspectre said...

Women do have a habit of mass infiltrating cultural constructs the second they become popular and profitable or edgy, and then; due to what I believe is an inherent facet of their biology, making it all about them, instead of sharing the space evenly with men. Or letting it remain mostly for us. But we men, usually facilitate this and give them the impression that it's okay to do so, due to our own innate desire to please them. We simply have to refuse to give in. Men deserve their own spaces without women's suspicion, manipulation or ridicule being a factor.

That being said, I'm pretty sure that a growing number of women have finally awakened, to empathy for men as human beings, (using their front brains to perceive more objectively), and are quite serious about respecting our space and helping us get out, from under the juggernaut of feminism and it's state, legal system and academia collaborators.

As you know, women have always had massive social influence, so this is a good thing. It's simply time for men; freeing themselves from limited roles, to tactically block out their urges vis a vis, women. Not so easy for the younger men, I know, but necessary for our own development; as the next wave of the renaissance man awakening to new ways of thinking.

When you consider the contributions of someone like Typhonblue, for example, there can be no doubt of her sincerity. And there are more women of similar perspective. Just be eternally vigilant, it's the price of freedom anyway, so we might as well get good at it.

So I agree with you, Fidelbogen, with my own adaptive twist.

9:12 PM  
Blogger Fidelbogen said...


In the interest of not making it "all about women", we ought to add that when the thick of the battle is joined, other men will be as much of an enemy to men as women will be. And in fact, more so....

9:20 PM  
Anonymous Introspectre said...

Agreed, the female supremacist tantrums of feminism, would never have gained political and legal power, without the facilitation of men, who were all too willing to increase their status, at the expense of their brothers and due process. Those men are far too prevalent.

Perhaps, we should frame the dialogue regarding those men, in such a way as to make them look weak and primitive, (It is a primitive motivation anyway), to women and men alike; when they try to, one up their brothers. Mangina and the like, isn't insidious enough. It must seem matter of fact and yet cut deeply.

In general, I believe those who lead our societies, (high status men), want to keep us hindbrain driven and therefore, overly emotional, reactionary and easy to manipulate. That's why they like to use women, who gain huge biologically derived advantages in social influence, from a society governed by base drives. Which can be used ruthlessly, to coerce men and turn them on each other, keeping the state, (and other agents), free from the scrutiny of those who most need a just society, regular men. The modern renaissance man, must utilize whatever it takes, to force the societal dialog into the front brain where objectivity can occur.

Then expose the unprincipled conduct of those men for the primitive archaic nonsense it is.

10:27 PM  
Blogger Fidelbogen said...

"It must seem matter of fact and yet cut deeply."

Well said. I am trying to think of something that will fit that description.

2:25 AM  
Blogger Tiffany Traylor said...

I love this post! Love it! I love it so much I want to marry it, uh, not really but maybe I'd let it move in with me. We must hold strong the one male place we have left and hold dear to us that Niel Armstrong never leaped anywhere for womankind!

4:21 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home