All Feminists are Feminists
We non-feminist partisans have heard so many times, from so many feminists, that "not all feminists are like that", that we have invented a handy-dandy acronymic way to refer to this:
Not All Feminists Are LikeThat.
NAFALT.
If you wish, pronounce this as "no fault" -- which summarizes what they wish to imply about themselves.
At any rate, the point is, that we GET IT. We perfectly well comprehend that not "all" feminists are "like that".
What we are really saying, is not that all feminists are like that -- but that all FEMINISM is like that.
Capisch?
All Feminism Is LikeThat.
We know that not every so-called feminist (singular) is like that -- but we aren't talking about those people. The feminists who are not "like that" frankly bore us, by reason of their insignificance. They are naughts. Ciphers. Nobodies. Political zeros.
And yet, they DO serve as a front, or cover-story, or posse of useful idiots, for the feminists who ARE "like that". I mean, as far as WE are concerned, those people aren't even feminists at all, and shouldn't call themselves feminists. But oddly enough, they do. And so we are willing to take them at their word. If they insist on calling themselves feminists, then we too insist on calling them feminists -- by OUR definition of feminism.
And so if they'd rather not be defined by us in the way that we are defining them, then they would do wisely to stop calling themselves feminists. Full stop.
Otherwise, we will go right on calling them feminists.
Labels: CF Memory Lane
posted by Fidelbogen at 5:09 PM
12 Comments:
Fidelbogen:
And that definition should apply to Socon feminists like Sarah Palin, Laura Schlessinger and others who claim not to hate men.
The female chorus at AVfM could fall into the same category as well; where according to Paul Elam's recent article on the 'MRM Blueprint for Bridge-Building' the goal of the Men's Movement is to finish the work that feminism started.
So..are you saying that GirlWritesWhat is a feminist? Wow. I know some feminists who would flip their wigs to hear that....
Paul Elam's choice of words might have been a tad injudicious in that case...but I know what he was talking about.
Not all volcanic eruptions are like that.
Not all rattlesnakes are like that.
Not all overdoses are like that.
Not all wars are like that.
Not all generalisms are like that.
Just what is the point, other than to obscure the obvious with the obvious?
NAFAH.
Not all feminists are hateful.
But you are advised.
Interesting attempt to put some numbers on the relevant NAWALT's -
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5SPUedP3ljM&feature=g-vrec
If you have a cunt, you are a feminists. Eventually all feminists will turn against men.
Men will soon discover that the only remedy to feminism is TOTAL WAR against them.
@anon1034:
You are entitled to your opinion, but I must state for the record that I do not endorse what you have written here.
Fidelbogen:
GWW and the other female commenters at AVfM are entitled to make pro-male statements if they wish; but how does one square anti-gynocentrism AND give control of the mens movement to women at the same time?
Anon1034:
To draw an analogy: no one should hate all Koreans. But you would approach a North Korean a lot differently than a South Korean. The first has been indoctrinated since youth into anti-western Communist fanaticism, while the second isn't much different than ourselves.
I suggest women should be approached in the same way. An Anglo-American female has been taught to hate men since childhood. Women from outside our culture haven't. I've been in a few other countries where women hold feminism in utter contempt.
Eric:
Do you feel, then, that "control of the men's movement" has been given to GWW, et al?
In what way? I'm curious, because I seem to have a more complex view of the pro-male project in general.
Fidelbogen:
The Men's Movement is really too diverse for any group to have direct control over it. That being said, AVfM seems to have a higher than usual number of female contributors. I don't think that they speak for men at all over there anymore.
The problem stems from the fact that even self-identified non-feminist women were educated and indoctrinated under feminist philosophy. Regardless of their intentions, they're going to default automatically to feminist-inspired premises in all their arguments.
Post a Comment
<< Home