he following appeared as a reader comment on the immediately foregoing post-- which featured a news story from Germany, about a female thief who "flashed" and cried rape in order to thwart apprehension:
"How utterly frightening that good men are immobilized by the threat of a false rape accusation. Frightening, but understandable. It would not have been worth it for this man to risk a bogus sexual assault charge just to do a good deed -- it is, sadly, better for him to allow the lying thief to go free than to risk having his entire life destroyed by a false rape claim. I would urge every man to do exactly that."Few men will bother standing up for other men"
"Why have we come to this deplorable state, where a lone woman has such power over virtually any man or teenage boy? Where she can immobilize any member of the so-called "stronger sex" with nothing more than the threat of a lie?
"We've come to this state because the radical feminists have somehow managed to convince persons of good will that every cry of rape means that some male "must have" done the "worst" act imaginable, and that false rape claims are a "myth," a "bugaboo," the product of some misogynist's "imagination."
"And when men and boys are arrested for this crime, they are presumed guilty. The news media -- which guards the accuser's anonymity with the same tenacity that Clark Kent guards Superman's -- at times even seems to relish the opportunity to humiliate, degrade and, yes, destroy the life of an accused male on the basis of nothing more than a lone woman's or girl's uncorroborated, unsubstantiated allegation.
"And men sit back and allow it to happen to other men because "he must have done something." Few men will bother standing up for other men -- until a false claim happens to them. And then we realize that we are all at risk. Solely because we were born male. "
. Aye! 'Tis is a bitter message and a bitter truth these words convey!
Happily, the times are changing. Far too slowly for people like us, but nevertheless: the times are changing!
For in fact, there ARE men in this world who WILL stand up for other men. They're out there; they exist! And the world contains more
such men today, than it did a year ago. And a year from now, it will again contain more such men than it does today! This is progress; this is motion; this is movement! Call it a men's movement, if you wish. It is all about men standing up for other men!
But now let's talk about the featured news story. I have lately been sensing an incipient demographic groundswell against feminist rape hysteria. It is clear to me that a LOT
of men out in the hinterlands, beyond the radar scope of officially sanctioned public discourse, know exactly what is going on with the issue of false rape, and they are MAD AS HELL ABOUT IT! And justifiably so. . . wouldn't you say??
And of course there is plenty more
for men to be angry about. I could rant on and on about ALL of the feminist social/political/cultural violence against men, but now is not the time for this. Our subject, for the present, is the growing anti-male false rape juggernaut -- and so I will confine my remarks to that realm.
My friends, we live in a socio-political pecking order which systemically deprecates male life to the value of garbage. But male life hasn't always been rated so low; the transformation has come about due to an evolutionary change in thinking. Men have always shouldered the greater burdens in society, and braved the buffeting winds, and endured the sacrifice of their very lives when that was necessary. So in a way male life has always been "valued" less, but only in the sense of being more expendable.
In the past, however, men enjoyed certain emoluments on account of all this -- and a certain respect, even awe, was accorded them.
But feminist innovation has brought about a number of mutations, particularly to the status of men within the social order. The evolutionary change in thinking has followed in the wake of female supremacist policy, which has sought to justify its general power-grab for women by depreciating the value of men altogether, in order to pave the way for such machinations. It was needful to introduce ideas that would have been considered "unthinkable" if they had been stated too abruptly and openly. So the task was to turn the unthinkable into the thinkable,
but in a manner that would pass unremarked owing to the guile, gradualness and stealth of its execution.
So how do we turn the unthinkable into the thinkable
? Simple: we promote unthinkable to the category
of the thinkable. And how do we accomplish THAT? Simple again: we erode, little by little, the entire thought-foundation which constituted the unthinkable's unthinkableness in the first place. And then we bootstrap the identical process through repeated cycles to the next level, and the next and the next. And at each loop in this iterative spiral, not only does the formerly unthinkable become thinkable, the formerly thinkable
because you literally cannot think it!
You no longer have the equipment to do so!
What I have just described applies to a lot of things, not merely the topic of present discussion. So stash it in your brain -- you'll find use for it!
In the case of false rape, or feminist rape hysteria at large, we have seen a progressive movement toward the culturally embedded "unthinkable" conviction that male life is worth considerably less than female life. This has been rendered thinkable
owing to a steady, orchestrated campaign of character assassination, over many years, directed toward the male population as a whole. In other words, it is now "thinkable" that men do not deserve equal protection under law
in (for example) such matters as rules of evidence, and the reason this is now "thinkable" is because "everybody knows" that "men are violent", or that rape is an expression of "patriarchal violence", and so on.
And how does "everybody" supposedly "know this"? Because the anti-male talking points of the feminist world-view have, due to a never-ending ambient drizzle of reiteration and virtual carpet-bombing of the collective mind, installed themselves to the point of permanence and untouchability -- at which point every path of so-called discovery becomes an exercise in bias confirmation. Accordingly, "everybody knows" that women are better people than men, and that men are the problem,
and that male life therefore has less value than female life, and that men don't deserve equal protection under the law because "everybody knows" that men are oppressors and more likely than women to be liars. Because of course "everybody knows" that men are the problem!. . . . .http://tinyurl.com/5ffxey
And women, as "everybody knows", never lie about rape! And how do we know THAT? Simple: because Susan Brownmiller as good as told us so, and hundreds of other people took their cue from Two-Percent Sue and repeated in their various books and factsheets the unsubstantiated "fact" that only 2% of rape allegations are false, which clearly "proves" that when a woman says "he raped me", the odds are overwhelming that she is telling the truth and that he is lying -- because of course, "everybody knows" that men are violent, and that men are the problem.
To summarize: It is now "thinkable" (or at least not unthinkable
) that a male citizen should be convicted of rape and locked in a cage upon a standard of evidence that would formerly have been considered risible -- and still is, for many other crimes. This state of affairs has been rendered conscionable because men have been methodically smeared and denigrated through deliberately orchestrated propaganda which has aimed (consciously or otherwise) to lower the value of male life to that of garbage, so that equal protection under the law may be taken away from men with no sense that any wrong has been done to them. Such a thing is now thinkable,
and indeed certain people "think nothing of it".
All of which (among other things) goes a long way toward explaining why certain people are able to break such wind as the following: http://tinyurl.com/6cmg4m
. . .with absolutely NO sensibility of the cognitive dissonance, and zero self-transparency as to the abysmal ignorance, appalling arrogance, dizzying effrontery, and brass-faced moral hypocrisy of what is being asserted or requested. Everything you read on that web-page is rooted in the feminist world-view, and is consequently a product of FEMINIST SUBJECTIVISM
- whose manner of formation is suggestively sketched in some of the foregoing paragraphs.
I proffer, by way of comfort to all my friends in the Movement, a simple plan to foil such impudence on the part of the enemy: Just say no. . .
and walk away!
Just say "I disagree."
What can they do, kill you? Throw you in jail? All you must do, is make it clear that you don't share the feminist world-view. State this boldly.
It has the powerful effect of "compiling" all your separate objections or criticisms into a global re-format. You are no longer slogging along in the "interpreter" mode of line-by-line fisking
, or tit-for-tat arguing.
Oh certainly, if that sort of thing is your gig, then by all means do what you do best! But the way I see it, that's like mowing your lawn with scissors when I have just offered you a shiny new rider-mower!
Think about it. The biggest mistake that MRA debaters make, is to argue from within the feminist world-view!
They do this all the time without even knowing it, and I wish they would knock it off!! It puts them perpetually on the defensive and squanders their energy in a task not unlike shovelling mud uphill! But if they would manfully and categorically proclaim the autonomy of their paradigm as a preamble to ANY debate, it would reverse the whole balance of power and turn the tables on the enemy! It would leave the feminists with only two options: to either debate the MRAs within the non-feminist
paradigm, or to meet them in some kind of limbo space between
the two paradigms and "negotiate from the ground up." Neither position would serve feminism to advantage.
And now, after a long road bristling with fruitful digressions, we return to that female piece of scheiss
who lied about about rape
in a manner so original and brazen. Ah..the little hussy! She was composed of pure brass, was she not? And to think, this occurred in Aachen, the ancient seat of government for the illustrious and most patriarchal Charlemagne!
Truly she was a bold one, our gal! And she lied about rape!
She did this in the most flippant, flagrant and unscrupulous way you can imagine, and she knew exactly
what she was doing. She lied about rape!
She understood her game to perfection, and to assume otherwise in not an option. She lied about rape!
Granted, she immobilized a man not with the "threat" of lie, but an actual one. But small matter: the "threat" was real enough, or at least he believed
that it was, and she knew enough to know, or at least shrewdly guess, that she could rely upon such an effect. And so, she lied about rape!
And why not? For her, it was profitable. It . . . empowered her! And immobilized him.
And the consequences have a branch structure, for having robbed "granny" of her "identity", and having thereupon lied about rape
to escape the judicial consequences of this robbery, our doubly-empowered robber can empower herself still further by means of additional robberies, at her leisure, in front of a computer screen.
Women can, do, and WILL lie about rape,
or anything else -- for the most far-flung reasons you can imagine, and others you can't hope to imagine because they are flung even farther! And they are capable of doing so with no conscience, no morals, no scruples whatsoever -- at the drop of a pin! I say capable, and by that I mean simply that it lies within the capacity of their universal human nature. The claim that women lie about rape
is neither a myth, nor a bugaboo, nor the product of any overheated misogynistic imagination. It is a claim which the evidence appears to support, and which ought therefore to be taken seriously. Very seriously. There may be ugly consequences if we fail to reckon with this.
But for now, I leave you with the assurance that men are far more awake to the crisis than their workaday silence might incline you to believe. And they are learning to stand up for each other too, although you mightn't yet think so. But in good time, rest assured, you will know
so! Meanwhile, I and others like me are working to boost things along by inspiring people with our impassioned words and exhortations. Please join us if you've a mind for such work -- the field is wide open!Yes, men will learn to stand up for each other!
At least, some
men will. Other men not only won't
do this, but will mock the ones who do, and lie about them, and even undertake to repress them by violence! So the battle line forms directly down the middle of maledom. Keep your eye upon that line; watch it grow sharper and meaner and deadlier. Be prepared for what is coming down the pike, and stay ahead of the game!
My friends, I thank you! :)