Friday, April 29, 2011

A Quick Thought for the Day

"Liberals" are supposed to be hip, cool, benevolent people -- open-minded people, philanthropical people, cosmopolitan people, non-judgmental people who love everybody, tolerate everybody, and try to understand what it's like to walk a mile in everybody's shoes. Yes, even if they can't precisely know where the shoe pinches everybody's foot.

That is all well and good, but after a while this began to work a strain upon their liberal human nature. Finally, the "liberals" couldn't take it any more, and so they invented political correctness.

That was a huge relief for them, because it was now possible for them to split their personalities, and be assholes again! ;)

I guess that means they can run on two different tracks, and make the world better and worse at the same time, which cancels out to staying just the same. But stasis is not progression -- so why on earth do they call themselves "progressives"?

Thursday, April 28, 2011

The Two-Party System of Sexual Politics - YouTube Version

I uploaded a different version of this yesterday. I was not happy with it, so I deleted it and recorded a new version, now uploaded, as follows:

From the video description on YouTube:

Thanks to feminist meddling in the life of this world, men and women have been established as separate political power blocs with separate interests that are bound to clash. This is the objective reality of history; it is true whether you like it or not -- and most of us don't, but the feminists got exactly what they wanted.

However, there is a silver lining to this very dark cloud. Namely, that feminism no longer has any ground from which to exert moral leverage against men. Men are free to go their own way and look out for their own interests. They have no social-contractual obligation toward women, and women are on their own. Besides, women have got the feminized state political machine and the women's movement to look out for them. . right?

That sounds harsh, but it's the way things are these days.

Monday, April 25, 2011

An Army Outside Their Door - YouTube Version

Speaks for itself.

Friday, April 22, 2011

How Feminism Constructs "Patriarchy"

Here is a picture of the Patriarchy! Take a look: that is a mighty fine, rugged, impressive-looking patriarch -- don't you think so?

But stop, and linger, and give this a closer look-see. Hey presto! The old curmudgeon completely disappears, doesn't he?

He doesn't even exist.

Well, all right, maybe he does exist. On a certain perceptual level. I mean, after all, reality has a number of aspects, right? And I grant you it is pretty hard not to "see" that old man in the picture; everything conspires and falls together just so, to assist your eye in forming the necessary image.

And yet, on closer examination, it is equally certain that he is a complete figment of your imagination.

Boy, we sure do need to get Don Juan and Carlos Castaneda in here to expand more eloquently upon the theme, eh?

All right, so that is how feminism constructs "patriarchy": by magical thinking, and . . . "seeing."

Some may raise an objection: "But Fidelbogen, aren't you doing the same thing with 'feminism', when you talk about the 'femplex', and 'target consensus' and all the rest of that stuff?"

Actually, no. I have reason to believe that I am NOT doing such a thing.

However, I am willing to be open-minded, and be a sport. If the feminists will agree to give up their game of 'constructing' the patriarchy, and to agree it is all just an illusionary play of light, shadow and shifting perspective, then I will agree to do likewise in my analysis of feminism.

Because, if the feminists do the former, I will no longer need to do the latter.

But do you reckon the feminists will take me up on my offer?

Hell no.

Thursday, April 21, 2011

The Counter-Feminist YouTube Channel: It's Official!

This is a bold new road for counter-feminism, and I think it will even kick the blog back to life! As you will note, I have now uploaded those two earlier videos to YouTube (instead of Blogger). So . . . that makes them, eh, official YouTube videos now!

The CF Channel will combine Disciplined Counter-feminist Preaching and fine music -- two great tastes that go together, don't you think so?

The video which I have embedded here has undergone some changes, so, even if you have already seen it, you will want to watch it again. BELIEVE me. . . you WILL want to watch it again! I'm serious.

And this, I submit, is how it Ought To Be Done.

All right, now I must return to my silence, and to that work I need to be doing but keep postponing. Ciao for now!

Wednesday, April 20, 2011

Feminism WIll Never Yield to Mere Persuasion

I think I see a YouTube channel in my future. In fact, I 've got one already! So far, I have only uploaded a couple of music videos -- nothing Counter-Feminist or MRA-related. Not yet, anyway. This YouTube channel will be rather unconventional -- a blend of music videos and Counter-Feminist Sermons. Eccentric as such a thing might sound, I have actually given it some thought, and trust me, this is psy-ops on a very high level. It does not blend the political with the personal, but rather the political with the Higher Realm.

Yes. . music is from a Higher Realm. Especially instrumental music. When you add the human voice, or any programmatic content (i.e. lyrics), it debases the soul of "pure" music, by dragging it toward our lower realm. That is not to say that you should never write "songs" or compose tone poems. It is only to say that music qua music is higher than all of that, a transcendental force with no need of anything beyond itself.

However, the musical selections on my YouTube channel are independent of the political tracts I will be posting -- they are merely juxtaposed. And being so, an inductive crossover effect happens.

All right, here is another video. It is based on an early blog post, in fact, the very first annunciation of post-argumentalism -- a doctrine altogether pivotal to all counter-feminist thinking:


Tuesday, April 19, 2011

One More Time: Feminism Hates You

Although I said I would be silent for a while, here I go again breaking my silence.

First, I would like you to read an excellent blog post by somebody who sees the picture very, very clearly. The blog, by the way, is called The Evil Penis. In the following post, the author gets straight to the nub of the matter: that feminism is all about hating men:

What is Feminism?

Next, I will repost a podcast -- as I occasionally do -- but this time I am doing something a mite different. I have "re-imagined" the podcast as a video. Well, of sorts. I have taken my cue from the legendary Thugtician, and used a still in lieu of video footage. This has been dubbed over the top of the podcast audio, resulting in the following. As you may note, this offers both a "political" and a "personal" aspect, but the political predominates. The rather obscured face is of such a sort that it does not permit a mixing of the personal with the political. We don't do that. No, the purpose here is only to offer a bit of "human focus" so that a human audience can relate to this, and more naturally absorb the message:


As you will note, this wraps up the case, in very tight terms, that feminism is a hate movement and cannot be plausibly understood as anything other. Taken together with the above-linked blog article, it will give you plenty of food for thought.

Here is a link if you wish to download a personal copy of the original podcast:

Now, I return to my silence because I have things to work on.

Note: the last bit of the audio got clipped off for some reason. I will fix that, but here is what it says: "whoever so desires, may undertake to convince me ... that feminism is a love movement.

Note 2: The defective video has been corrected, and is now posted in complete form.

Monday, April 18, 2011

Moral Dissonance: Staying Free of It

I haven't posted in a while, as I warned. But just to show that I am still alive, I will share the following reader comment which I left on Lady Catherine's Musings of a Pro-Human Woman blog. It is important stuff that needs to be said; an articulation of strategy, actually:
As to moral dissonance:

I do not expect the feminists to behave honorably (or honestly), so I am not a bit surprised when they live up to my predictions. Which they consistently do.

But by their dishonest and dishonorable behavior, they license me to act the same toward them IF I SO CHOOSE.

My master strategy toward feminism is largely built around "giving them a taste of their own." If they whine that I am being "unfair", I say "whoop-de-doo, how does it feel?"

But they can get out of it very easily if they will simply agree to renounce feminism.

It is not so easy for me to renounce maleness -- but they can easily renounce feminism. So in a comparative way, they are getting a mighty sweet deal.

No moral dissonance here. I'll play it just as dirty and vicious as they eventually choose to make it.

Or they can be sensible, and back off. . .
Yes. Honor, morality, fairness: these things are for my friends.

It is quite simple. If you call yourself a feminist, you are not my friend. Granted that if you are sufficiently naive and earnest, you will inhabit the lower end of the enemy spectrum -- but you ARE on that spectrum; make no mistake! You are a participant in the thing called feminism, and I can only assume that somehow, you are getting your slice of the tainted and very monolithic feminist pie. And in the end, you will enjoy just the experience which feminism has inflicted on the male population. Yes, the good ol' tarbrush -- I, and others like me, will inflict this upon you. And I warn you in advance that we do not plan to be "fair". So, when the time comes, you can save your breath. Don't earnestly femsplain to us what "kind" of feminist you are -- your kind are all alike!

To avoid moral dissonance, I should make clear that I do not expect your side to act any better than what I have promised, from our side, above. You have always acted that way anyway, and you always WILL act that way -- regardless of how we act! We're damned if we do and damned if we don't. We know this from long experience, and believe me, we know you well. In fact, better than you know yourselves. So, we activated non-feminist partisans have nothing to lose by giving it both barrels. . . do we?

The "code of honor" that we BOTH operate by, in our dealings with each other, is a nasty one -- but withal admirably honest in its nasty way. So I think we understand each other now . . . don't we?

My long-term strategy through all of this, is to drive a wedge between feminist and non-feminist, to accentuate the political boundary, to etch and inscribe that boundary with exactitude, making very clear to the entire world precisely what feminism is and is not -- according to non-feminist terms of understanding.

If you wish, call it the battle of Armageddon. No moral dissonance here. Bring it on. Do your damnedest, and we will call you out for it. And you will not appreciate our ice-cold tone of voice, up there on that barren, windswept mountain-top.

Of course, you do have an alternative: you can do the right thing, and renounce feminism. And as a token of your good faith, you should renounce the WORD feminism. Or else we are bound to wonder if you have truly renounced feminism.

My reader comment, cited above, can be viewed in its native habitat HERE:

Moral Dissonance and Morality

And now, I shall return to not posting. So. . expect silence for a while.

Friday, April 08, 2011

Anti-Feminist Organization Inaugurated
in Germany

I have just gotten the word, from three different European sources, that the IGAF organization which was established in Switzerland last summer has now set up shop in Germany as well:
"In the long term, Feminism is to be overcome and left on the rubbish heap of history. The relationship of man and woman needs to be de-ideologized, and families must be strengthened as the foundation of society.

On 9 April 2010, the Association of Antifeminism (IGAF) was founded in Switzerland, and the 1st International Antifeminism-Congress also attracted many participants from Germany. Thus, the wish arose to become active in Germany, too, and to oppose the generally privileged treatment of women and the reverse proportional, namely disadvantaged status of men. . . .

On this basis, the Association of Antifeminism Germany (IGAFD) is founded on 4 April 2011. The IGAFD is an independent society, which intends to work closely together with the IGAF in Switzerland, and to carry out joint activities. The Association of Antifeminism Germany (IGAFD) plans to organize an International Antifeminism Congress in Germany in the near future."
I have gotten an e-mail (from Switzerland) which I quote in full. This includes a link to the above-quoted PDF file which announces the opening of the German IGAF (Interessengemeinschaft Antifeminismus Deutschland, or IGAFD):
Our brothers in Germany have set up their own IG Antifeminism.
Here is the news (in English):

Finally, the original IGAF website may be of interest.

All right, now I must get back to work on my non-blog project. But I thought this news might bring a smile! :)

Monday, April 04, 2011

A YouTube That You Must Watch

Here is another offering for the sunlight of the world's gaze. Newcomers and counter-feminist proselytes will find this to be a powerful piece of the puzzle. Enough of these pieces will add up to a full picture of the feminist elephant -- which we must learn to see in its entirety. We don't want to be groping blind men, do we?

Now I will treat you to some of the comments which followed this video on the YouTube channel:

"Robert Connell is still a man. A mutilated mentally ill man to be sure but a man none the less. Connell's notion that he is suddenly female because of surgical intervention, hormone therapy and having his beard removed via electrolysis is so absurd that it beyond my ability to understand the depth of his mental disorder. "
"Any person who labels herself a "feminist" is participating in the longstanding anti-male agenda of feminism. Regardless of her individual take on what she or he thinks is feminism, they are lending their name to an institution which has scapegoated all males as the wellspring of all women's problems. If I call myself a Nazi because I want to help people in Appalachia no one will care about my philanthropy. The same should apply for feminists."
"If I wanted help, I would not seek help from a masculinity expert who cuts their penis off because they hate being male. It's a wonder why they still pronounce him/her to be a masculinity expert even after this....transformation."
Finally, I will treat you to my own words, left as a comment on an article which Hugo Schwyzer published at the Good Men Project website. And no, somehow I don't feel like linking to it. But suffice to say that the article was smug, tendentious, patronizing, pontificating and willfully ignorant:
"Hugo Schwyzer has absolutely NO authority to pontificate on the subject of “why guys don’t want to get married”. And don’t you believe for one minute, that he doesn’t know what’s happening. He is being willfully obtuse, selling out normal men everywhere, and poisoning the minds of young people with feminist indoctrination.

"Schwyzer is pissing in the face of the whole male population when he writes this kind of garbage.

"The MRAs have been explaining for YEARS why men don’t want to get married. All you must do, is listen. It is not at all hard to figure out. So again, that is why I say that Hugo Schwyzer and people like him are being willfully obtuse: they are pretending not to get it. But deep in their guts they know perfectly well what is really happening. And they are cashing in, building their parasitical careers at the expense of truth, upon a foundation of human misery. At the same time, they are helping to multiply that misery — stashing more and more psychopolitical gunpowder and petrol in the societal basement, toward a catastrophic explosion that cannot fail to occur sooner or later. Yes, truth has a funny way of working its way to the surface eventually. . .

"People like Schwyzer are self-loathing because they are loathsome. And deep in their guts they know this. But they project their self-loathing onto normal men, and try to suck as many of them into into the feminist ideological shithole as they possibly can. Misery loves company, and let me tell you, they are bound to get their wish because things are bound to get miserable as hell in the future.

"Hugo Schwyzer ought to be deeply ashamed for writing this article, but knowing him, I know that he is morally incapable of it."
Mind you, I don't believe for one minute that Hugo Schwyzer has "gender identity disorder" like Robert/Raewyn Connell. I am sure that Hugo has no intention of cutting off his schvanze in order to express his deep-seated contempt for men and maleness. I think that Hugo's problem stems from a rather different source, more connected with his adolescent life experience. And yet, I very readily discern the pragmatic socio-political continuum that links people like Schwyzer with people like Connell. They are part of the same device, the same "conspiracy" if you will. And by their conjoined efforts, they are driving the world toward the same end of the field, if not the identical goalpost.

If you haven't already done so, or even if you have already done so, go take a look at the Swedish documentary which I blogged about a few days ago. Do this while all of the above is still fresh in your memory. For if you wish to truly "see" feminism, you must place certain things side-by-side in your mind so that their organic linkage to each other becomes increasingly difficult to overlook:

Friday, April 01, 2011

How Feminism Searches for "Truth"

Angry Harry posted this link recently:

As you will discover, it is an article in the Village Voice. It concerns a group called the Women's Funding Network, which wanted to create a good story about the sex-trafficking of children in order to, well . . . get funding. So, they hired a consulting firm called the Schapiro Group, and the Schapiro Group used Mickey Mouse magic to discover an epidemic growth of trafficking -- which is just what the Women's Funding people wanted to hear. I will assume that the Women's Funding Network is a feminist group because, honestly now, I don't know what else it could be. But of course, we mustn't forget that "not all feminists are like" the Women's Funding Network, right?

You counter-feminist newcomers who are just getting up to speed about all of this, should understand that such things happen unceasingly in feminist world. Feminism would collapse in about two months if the feminist operators did not stoke their furnace on steady bucketloads of lies, lies, more lies, fibs, falsehoods, fabrications, flim-flams and flapdoodles. This is how feminism rolls!

I know, I make it sound humorous in the way I write it. But in cold, hard, sober truth there is not a god-damned thing funny about any of this! I am an MRA, and I say that. We MRAs are cold, hard, sober people -- and let me tell you something, this shit we preach about feminism is real! You think you'll believe me in five years? In ten years? But why wait so long? Believe me now! If you wait ten years to believe me, then believe me . . . you will wish you had believed me now.

Be sure to look into the reader comments on that Village Voice article -- especially what was written by a fellow who signs himself as "funcuz".

A Call to Action: Crucify Mary Kellett Upside-Down in a Barrel of Shit

The following article, from A Voice for Men, is reprinted in toto at the behest of of its author. Please take the time to read it, and consider following the activism plan which is outlined there. I myself will be sending e-mails as suggested. If you decide to do likewise, please leave a short notice to that effect in the comment section of this blog, and THEN. . . pop on over to A Voice for Men and repeat same in the comments there:

Read through the comments there also; many of the commenters have useful info and tips to share. Thank you!

"There are often times that we shake our heads at injustices in the world. Sometimes it seems to be all we can do. And with so many problems in modern life, and their often systemic, intractable nature, it can be difficult to choose what battles to fight and when. Because of this we have increasingly become a nation of head shakers, concerned about an array of injustices but often not knowing where to turn or what to do to solve them.

"With that in mind we have an opportunity, right here and now, to face down and fight against a terrible injustice, an absolute evil, going on in the state of Maine.

"Vladek Filler is about to face trial for a second time on the charge of raping his wife, Ligia. He was brought to trial the first time by Bar Harbor prosecutor Mary N. Kellett, who has sought to imprison Mr. Filler despite the fact that she knows that there is no physical evidence that he ever committed a crime, and despite the fact that his accuser Ligia Filler, has proven to be a violent criminal, a liar who has been caught in false allegations against her husband, and a physical and emotional abuser of her husband and children with a history of severe psychiatric problems.

"Ligia Filler has been referred to as “certifiable” by sheriff’s department personnel who she repeatedly threatened to kill.

"Mary Kellett’s professional conduct in this case breeches virtually all canons of legal ethics where it concerns prosecutors, from intentionally misleading jurors to avoiding pretrial discovery to actually asking a law enforcement officer to refuse to comply with a valid subpoena in order to help her conceal exculpatory evidence.

"All of this, and many other similar cases, have been conducted under the supervision of Bar Harbor, Maine, District Attorney Carletta Bassano, leading to the almost unavoidable conclusion that the problem is not just one rogue prosecutor, but one in which District Attorney Bassano is an enabling accomplice.

"Additionally, all of these events have transpired without so much as raising an eyebrow in local news media.

"Given the complicity of her supervisor and the lack of attention by local media, Kellet appears emboldened to continue this reign of terror on the life of Vladek Filler, his children, and other innocents who reside in the community Kellett is supposed to protect.

"After having Filler’s first conviction overturned by the Maine Supreme Court, due to her own prosecutorial misconduct, she is coming after him again, putting him through another trial on the same slipshod evidence.

"Kellett is not pursuing justice; she is making a mockery of it in ways that border on criminality. She is out of control and no one with authority over her is doing anything about it.

"And given the hubris demonstrated by her actions, it is clear she feels free to proceed with impunity.

"We cannot, must not, allow this to happen.

"This is a battle worth choosing to fight, and A Voice for Men is not the only place that is happening. Glenn Sacks at Father’s and Families, the nation’s leader in father’s rights advocacy is speaking out about this story. You can also read about it at The False Rape Society. This article will also be running at, with thanks to our good friend Mr. W.F. Price.

"The organization Stop Abusive and Violent Environments (S.A.V.E.) has taken an even more significant action, sending a Complaint for the Disbarment of Prosecutor Mary Kellett to the Maine Board of Overseers for the Bar.

"They have also authored a letter to Paul LePage, the Governor of Maine, referencing the disbarment complaint and making an appeal for an intervention on Mary Kellett on behalf of Vladek Filler and the people of Maine.

"And you can do your part.

"Write Governor LePage here and respectfully insist on an investigation to the practices of Mary N. Kellett. The message can be as simple as. “For the sake of justice, please assure that Mary Kellett is relieved of her prosecutorial duties and disbarred from the practice of law.”

"Write the Board of overseers for the Bar here, and insist that they respond to the allegations against Kellett with an investigation.

"Lastly, try to get the media involved. Bill Trotter does crime reporting for the Bangor Daily News. You can write email him at or phone him at 207-460-6318 and ask him to consider investigating this story. This is a very important step as media attention will require political attention and action of some kind.

"Don’t wait for others to do this, please, or think that just one person calling and writing is enough. That would be a fatal mistake.

"When you have done one or all the suggestions listed here, please come back to this thread and simply put the word “done” in the comments, wherever you are reading this.

"What is happening in Maine is only a microcosm of what is happening across the western world. So regardless of where you live, your insistent message to one or all of these people can help force them to consider looking in to Kellett’s activities. And make no mistake about it, Kellett’s actions, if unchecked, are a forecast of own future. We know this is a witch hunt, but because most are ignoring it, it will spread. If we take this silently, we have lost in the most tragic and disgraceful of ways.

"This is a fight worth fighting, people. If you are reading this, you could be another Vladek Filler, or someone who cares about him. Your children could be hurt the same way his children have. And your freedom, even if seemingly secure today, cannot be assured for tomorrow as long as the likes of Mary Kellett are allowed to practice predatory prosecutions against innocent human beings.

"And if she is allowed to build a career on doing this, there will be nothing to stop the same from happening where you live.

"It is your future, and your move.

"[Addendum: A Voice for Men Radio is doing a one hour special on this tonight, March 29, 2011 at 9:00 p.m. EST. You can listen to the show live, or the archives are always available in the sidebar at immediately following the program.]"