Friday, January 27, 2012
Wednesday, January 25, 2012
Time for another shot of that Higher Spiritual Energy.
(Takes the golden flask down from the cupboard, and quietly uncorks it . . . )
Feminism Spreads Lies Like a Fly Spreads Germs
The accompanying graphic image was created by a pro-male blogger who was inspired by a slogan which I coined recently.
Memes can take many forms, and what you see here is among the most elemental and effective of those forms.
I am posting this graphic image for anybody on the planet who wants to fly away with it and spread it around.
Hell man, you could even print it on T-shirts and coffee mugs. Certainly you can post it on your website. Best of all, you can print it on little squares of paper and leave these in all manner of places where all manner of people will happen upon them.
This is the sort of thing that will land in people's brains, and buzz around there, and never leave!
It will find its way into the general buzz of conversation, too!
I kindly thank St. Estephe, the blog keeper who created this. I am honored to see my words so skillfully combined with pictures, and made ten times more effective by that method.
Go now, and visit the The Unknown History of Misandry -- the source for this and tons more good stuff that you will want to look into:
New Video -- Patriarchy Theory and Female Accountability
Patriarchy theory is the intellectual core of feminism. The purpose of patriarchy theory is to give women a complete pass, as regards moral accountability, in their dealings with men.
Monday, January 23, 2012
Schwyzer and Kimmel are MRAS!
decided to turn their coats, and their backs, on feminism. These erstwhile staunch pillars of what is called the pro-feminist men's movement, will henceforth be contributing their professorial gravitas and savvy to the pro-male men's movement instead. The two have informed me in confidence that they will stay on in their teaching posts as though nothing had changed, yet will, as Kimmel put it to me recently, "work to undermine the feminist agenda by subterfuge, merely pretending to support it while planting mixed messages between the lines."
Schwyzer in particular has confided to me his "complex feelings of guilt" for all of the time he has spent boosting feminism and "filling the minds of young men and women with dreck." He then quoted an obscure passage from the book of Ephesians, which I forgot to make note of, and concluded with the statement that "a great weight has departed from my shoulders -- almost like casting off a worthless bag of rocks!"
As you will surely remark, we have not failed to use the occasion as a photo opportunity. However, I would ask you, my readers, to keep this in confidence. Okay? We don't want to blow Mike and Hugo's cover, see?
A Wicked New Slogan for You. It is Brutal!
The following, originating from Teri Stoddard, was posted on AVFM. I hope you will take this under consideration. If you are a feminist -- that is to say, a moral idiot -- then I am certain you will not take this under consideration. But if you are a compassionate, empathetic person of conscience, you'll get on it straightway, because there is nothing in the proposed measure that a person like yourself could possibly object to:
From SAVE and AVfM News
Email Subject: The Senate Judiciary Committee Needs Your Calls By Thursday
Title: The Senate Judiciary Committee Needs Your Calls Before Thursday’s Vote On VAWA
Dear (Contact First Name),
The Senate Judiciary Committee is expected to vote on the reauthorization of the Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) this coming Thursday at 10am. As you know, we have found many flaws in this bill, which is why we created the Partner Violence Reduction Act (PVRA).
The Partner Violence Reduction Act:
- Gives priority to real victims.
- Reduces false allegations.
- Removes provisions that violate the Constitution.
- Protects families.
- Provides legal assistance for alleged victim and alleged offender.
- Requires third-party accreditation.
- Curbs immigration fraud.
- Makes the law gender-inclusive.
Today we’d like you to call members on the committee. Tell them to reject VAWA and to support the Partner Violence Reduction Act. More info: www.saveservices.org/pvra
Please contact the members listed below:
- Chuck Grassley (202) 224-3744
- Orrin G. Hatch (202) 224-5251
- Jon Kyl (202) 224-4521
- Jeff Sessions (202) 224-4124
- Lindsey Graham (202) 224-5972
- John Cornyn (202) 224-2934
- Michael S. Lee (202) 224-5444
- Tom Coburn (202) 224-5754
Call them once, call them twice, call them several times. Call Monday, Tuesday and Wednesday. Ask your family, friends, church family, co-workers and neighbors to call. And don’t forget to ask your facebook, twitter and google+ friends too.
It’s now or never, folks!Sincerely,TeriTeri Stoddard, Program DirectorStop Abusive and Violent Environments
By the way, if anybody is scoffing at the lack of "activism" in the so-called "MRA movement", then the above is one of numerous examples which ought to make you eat crow.
Actually, there is no such thing as the "MRA movement". The proper term is non-feminist revolution. I, myself, belong to the agitation section of the NFR, but I certainly don't mind lending a hand with the activism from time to time. (Right now, for example. Or the Kevin Driscoll case, for another example.)
The original AVFM post is here:
Thursday, January 19, 2012
Video Redux -- The Root of the Present Evil
Remember that when we talk about the death of the social contract, we aren't just talking about the traditional 'patriarchal' contract between men and women. No, we are talking about the compact which binds together our entire civil polity. This is prediction, and not prescription. It is based upon careful, deliberate study of objective reality.
The future prospect is both frightening, and empowering. But let us overcome fear, and use the power wisely in order to steer clear of the worst. The future is what we make it.
Tuesday, January 17, 2012
Monday, January 16, 2012
Some Stupid Son-of-a-Bitch
I was forced to stomp hard on my brakes and swerve sharply to the left so that I wouldn't crash into him.
That stupid son-of-a-bitch!
Good thing there was no oncoming traffic in the left lane at that moment.
So. . . how was your day?
Saturday, January 14, 2012
A Little Slice of Life
Just the other day, near my home, one of those bandido-masked critters came out of the woods. He wasn't doing much when I saw him, just sort of hanging out and sniffing the dirt at the bottom of the big cedar tree. I watched from my doorway. Right about then, I heard a cherubic young voice. A little girl, maybe four years old, had also seen the raccoon, and she was enchanted.
"Hi, kitty!", the apple-cheeked darling piped up, waving her chubby little arms enthusiastically.
She was not much of a zoologist, this young one, for she had mistaken procyon lotor for felis domesticus. In view of her tender years, such an error was understandable and even charming. But it was fraught with peril. Raccoons, you see, are wild animals. They have wicked sharp teeth, they are known to carry rabies, and you really don't want to get cozy with them. Yet little Goldilocks, waddling toward that glorified, ringtailed rat with squeals of innocent delight, was clearly intent upon so doing.
Now, picture yourself in my place. As a dutiful citizen, I had the choice to act in loco parentis, meaning that I could lay a firm-but-gentle guiding hand upon the little one, and guide her firmly but gently out of harm's way. Yet in view of modern reality, with the rabies of feminism and political correctness coursing through the social bloodstream, it was needful I should have a care for my self-preservation. Surely, the undue imputations that might be drawn should I, a burly adult male, lay hands upon a four-year-old girl, offered a wicked set of fangs in their own right.
It took me all of two seconds to make my decision. I would let the little girl have her rendezvous with the "kitty". So I went back indoors and sat down, and quietly thanked feminism for creating such a dilemma. A moment later the tragic screaming and sobbing reached me faintly through the wall.
Stunned silence in reader-land.
But lift yourself up, gentle reader. The ending to that story never really happened. In reality, the little girl's mother was standing nearby, and she immediately stepped in and dragged the girl to safety, admonishing her sternly: "That's not a kitty! That's a wild animal! Stay away!"
Ah, thank goodness for mothers! Who the hell needs fathers, anyway?
Thursday, January 12, 2012
Hey Feminist Morons! Here's a New Poster Boy for the "MRA Movement"!
"SAN RAFAEL, Calif. — An investigator has testified that a diary detailing sexual assaults of women was found along with posed photographs of two Northern California slaying victims in the home of a suspected serial killer. . . The lead investigator on the case made the disclosure Wednesday during a preliminary hearing for Joseph Naso, a Reno, Nev., man charged in the "Double Initial" killings. . ."And nowadays especially, when the non-feminist revolution is rearing up on its hindlegs at long last, you'll want to dig ever-so-deeply into this, in search of any dirt that it contains. If you are really, really creative, I'm sure you can prove that this Joseph Naso guy is the quintessential elixir of everything which is not feminism.
And that will help you greatly, because non-feminism is everywhere these days, rising up from the cellar and precipitating from the clouds, and things are starting to look sticky for you. Aren't they?
I'm sure you'll want to pay close heed to the sexual nature of the crimes, and milk that aspect for all it is worth. Because we all know that MRAs and other non-feminists are just a pack of bitter misogynists, holding down the lid on a bubbling cauldron of frustrated sexual rage. We all know that anybody who attacks feminism, or defends men falsely accused of rape, or declares that VAWA is evil, is harboring ulterior motives. So here is your big opportunity to play armpit Dr. Freud in your time-honored way once again, and "make the political personal", and really jab the shit out of these creepy non-feminist people who just want to be left alone by feminism.
I invite feminist readers to log in to the comments, and submit an essay proving that this Joseph Naso fella is really a non-feminist "MRA" who drinks bourbon in the same oak-panelled club room with Angry Harry, Hugh Hefner, Norman Mailer, Benito Mussolini, Glenn Sacks, G.P. Telemann, Pierce Harlan, RockingMrE, Adam Kostakis, Fidelbogen, and Karl (at Antimisandry.com).
If I get enough entries, I will announce the winner and publish it in a post unto itself. Have at it, grrls and grrrly guys! And you too, Schwyzer!
Wednesday, January 11, 2012
I Am An Agitator -- Others Are Doing "Activism"
Here I go again, hammering on timeless messages in order to catch up to all the people who haven't heard them yet.
But really. . . what IS so-called "activism"? Broadly considered, I would say it is any kind of politically goal-directed activity.
And is agitating an activity? Why, certainly. And is it politically goal-directed? Well, it certainly can be.
So I, and many others like me, are "activists" in the broad sense of the term. We are actively agitating -- meaning, actively stirring things up for a politically goal-directed reason. It is all part of politics, and all part of a larger, orchestrated game. Orchestras have fiddlers, bassoonists, trombonists, clarinetists, timpanists -- you name it. So, you don't fault the drummer because he is not a cello player, right? There is just no way that a drum can do what a cello does, or vice-versa. But they both have a vital part to play.
And yes. . there are traditional activist groups in operation, lobbying for men's right, father's rights, family rights and so on. They're out there. And they are doing "activism" as it is customarily understood. What they are NOT doing, in most cases, is aggressively going after feminism specifically -- or at least not by name.
But they are damaging feminism in a different way, by attacking the vital centers of feminism's operative power structure. Yes, even if they don't always mention feminism, they are still undermining it in a practical way. You can see this by the flak they catch -- it means they are over the target.
So finally, we agitators too are "activists", for to score rhetorical points against feminism is indeed, in the larger political frame, "activism". But if you are a stickler for semantics, just understand that activists and agitators have separate but equally important parts in the orchestrated business of collapsing feminism. That is what we ultimately strive to accomplish, and what will ultimately do the greatest good for men and women.
Monday, January 09, 2012
A Dynamic Duo of Videos
Next, Barbbbaaarrossssaaa's video. I will not second his sour assessment of women, yet I will accept that he is a rational adult who formed his conclusion honestly, and that he is perfectly entitled to his opinion. The present state of the social contract certainly does not obligate me to be a white knight in defense of the Female Collective. So, let Barbarosssaaa speak his mind like a free man:
I trust that these videos have made you say "hmmm", and turned you into a sadder, wiser person.
Sunday, January 08, 2012
Oh What a Friend We Have in Feminism!
Some earnest feminist, out yonder, will watch this video and earnestly demand to know what this has got to do with feminism, and then earnestly make us understand how she deplores what happened to this ill-fated man and does not condone his suffering in any way.
All right. Fair enough. I will credit the earnest feminist for her good faith. And furthermore, I can allow that the evil "girlfiend" in this story might not think of herself as a feminist, or know much about academic feminist theory and suchlike.
So, how DOES all of this pertain to feminism?
Let me answer for the zillionth time, because I'm sure that somebody reading this right now has only recently arrived in these parts and cannot be expected to know it all.
Episodes like this are happening a lot more nowadays because feminist social innovation has generated a culture that naturally gives rise to such things. Feminism has empowered women to act the way this woman has acted, and to get away with it.
So that even if this woman is not personally a "feminist", she is a disease vector of feminist influence in society, helping to spread the consequences of feminist innovation by inflicting harm upon a man. Note how the police department "always took her side, even when they had no evidence to back up her story." That is exactly how the feminists want it to be, because feminist patriarchy theory and feminist anti-male law has taught police officers and criminal justice people to view MEN, sight unseen, as "primary aggressors".
Well it looks like the wheels of justice eventually turned in this particular man's favor, but that only proves that Perfect Feminism is not YET in effect. But they're working on it. Rest assured, they're working on it.
And so, earnest feminist, now you know what this has got to do with feminism. So my question to you is: why do you insist on calling yourself a feminist?
Really, what is your excuse?
For when you stick the word "feminist" to yourself, you are linking your good name to such injustice as this, and to a long list of other things which are very, very nasty indeed!
Your best plan is to stop calling yourself a feminist. Non-feminist people won't cut you any slack; they will not have the patience to hear your mewling lectures about "what feminism really means". Nor should they be required to do so. They can see perfectly well what feminism is, so kindly don't insult their intelligence. YOU are the one who doesn't know what feminism is, and THEY are the ones who will set you straight. Boy, will they ever set you straight!
So do yourself a favor, and do us all a favor.
STOP CALLING YOURSELF A FEMINIST.
Wednesday, January 04, 2012
What is "Social Marketing"?
I would recommend studying that Wikipedia article slowly and thoughtfully, and making the information a part of your conceptual knowledge base.