Monday, April 30, 2012

Domestic Violence -- The Lies Are Over

Feminists Are Incorrigible Liars Who Will Never Change

As we all know, feminism spreads lies like a fly spreads germs. And they never stop. They NEVER STOP!! Somebody needs to shut these people down cold!

It seems like that is all they EVER do -- spread lies. For example, the following recent episode:

That one has been debunked for YEARS, but they keep it in the loop like dirty old bathwater, and they never stop repeating it.

This is what we are up against, and this is why we fight. And this is why we consider feminism an alien force that cannot be dealt with humanly. People who behave in such ways will never "do the right thing". They can only be dealt with rudely and harshly, on just the same level of morality which they, themselves, practice against the rest of the world.

Thursday, April 26, 2012

Is Female Biology Inherently Feminist?

It's hard to disagree with anything Barbarosssaaaa says about feminism here. And truly, he has given us a feast for thought. But he goes further. He says things about women, too.

I am bound to admit that he has the facts straight. I, too, cannot see women in general rebelling against feminism or what feminism has done to men. No, I cannot hear them roar. And Barbarosssaaaa  certainly has a point when he notes how quickly women in countries like India have embraced feminist innovation.

So, is  Barbarosssaaaa  right about women in general?

Well let's be clear about something: He can say whatever he wants! He is entitled to speak his mind like a free man, and it's no job of mine to lecture him about it. In the present case you might call  Barbarosssaaaa  a "misogynist", but is that really such a bad thing? I mean, allowing for the sake of argument that his estimation of women was correct, then any person who valued the truth would need to be a "misogynist" also, or else be a shirker of the truth. Am I right?

I mean, if the truth about women really was so bad -- just IF, mind you -- then you would need to admit it, wouldn't you? Of course you would, if you were truthful. But then, that would make you a "misogynist" . . . wouldn't it? Otherwise, you would be a liar. . . wouldn't you?

So, it sounds like "misogyny" would be your only decent option under those conditions. Wouldn't it?

Yes. Your choice, under said conditions, is to be a "misogynist" or to be a liar. Damned if you do, damned if you don't.

Clearly, Barbarosssaaaa is a "misogynist". That is, he makes a globally pejorative conclusion about women. He concludes that there is something dishonorable about women in general. Is not that what Barbarosssaaaa concludes? Yes, I think it is. And is not that what any feminist would call "misogynistic"? Yes, I think it is.

Be it so, but Barbarosssaaaa is clearly a man of principle, a man who adheres to the truth in good faith as his own lights have revealed it. Hence, Barbarosssaaaa is a "misogynist" because that is the best possible thing for him to be. And because the only alternative, for him, is to be a shirker of the truth. So in the end, Barbarosssaaaa is nothing if not consistent with his own ethics. . eh?

Barbarosssaaaa, then, is doing an honorable and principled thing by being a "misogynist". And although I personally do otherwise, I respect his ethical choice and don't in the least hold it against him. And if that sounds like a bizarre pretzel, it is only the nature of the present age. Everything is twisted out of shape in these twisted times!

That is what feminism has done to all of us. Men, women . . . all of us.

Look, it's a simple case of force and counter-force. Action and re-action. In a society (such as ours) where the hatred of men and maleness is so widely tolerated, it is only natural that a corresponding disaffection toward women and femaleness would arise by way of compensative symmetry. It is natural, because nature will not tolerate such a lopsided state of energy. That is how the world works, and if you don't believe me then you are not living in the real world.

And this compensative symmetry is a sign of health within the body-politic. It means that things are working as they should. I mean, if Group X in a society is the ongoing target of hatred and denigration, and if Group X does not, at some point, radiate animosity back toward the source of the original animosity, then something weird and unexplainable is happening. Something, indeed, which defies the laws of the universe.

But hate bounces, my friend! Hate bounces. That is the law of the universe.

And that is why Barbarosssaaaa practices "misogyny", and is perfectly right to do so. And not only Barbarosssaaaa, but quite a few others as well. So if you are one who brays about misogyny as a great moral evil, yet makes nary a squeak about misandry, then you are a filthy jackass and a cancerous hypocrite, and somebody needs to re-set your clock for the good of the entire human race.

As for "the woman question", I will not walk with Barbarosssaaaa down the road of grim conclusions. That is, I remain a skeptic. An agnostic. Hence, any woman I meet has a clean slate. For me, "women" does not exist at all, for I recognize only woman A, woman B, and so on. And that, among other reasons, is why I don't support feminism.

So any woman I meet is free to prove that she is what she is. Simple and basic, don't you think so? I will leave the field wide open. I will suspend all judgment. I will wait. I will watch. I will make note of what she scribes upon that slate. It might be wonderful poetry, it might be obscene graffitti -- who knows? But I will wait, and I will watch, and after she has written I will judge.

Wednesday, April 25, 2012

New Video -- Message to Non-Feminist Women - Part 3

Tuesday, April 24, 2012

The Difference Between Jehovah's Witnesses and Feminists

It happened less than three minutes ago. A couple of elderly gents arrived on my doorstep and informed me that they were Jehovah's Witnesses, and that they wanted to share a certain message "about the Bible."

I am, be it known, not a Jehovah's Witness. I have no desire to become one, and have never harbored any such desire in the past. Further, I am bound by no political obligation to either become one, or to engage the "Jay-dub" narrative on any level. Especially not by budgeting any time to their persuasion efforts.

On the other hand, I have a soft spot for nice, genteel, old-fashioned old folk. Call that a weakness, if you will.

Oh, that reminds me. Sometimes I get Mormon missionaries on my doorstep. They are always young lads too young to shave, and for some reason they are called "elders". Go figure!

All right, so I wanted to be nice to these nice grandfatherly chaps, because all in all I'm a fairly nice chap myself.   But at the same time, I wanted to send them packing. Contrary impulses warred within me, but I was able, finally, to send them along to the next doorstep. And I don't doubt that they could read my conflicted state of mind. I don't think I hid it very well at all -- I was a tad abrupt with them, more than I wanted to be.

Mormons, Jay-dubs and their ilk need to proselytize. Unlike the feminists, they don't control academia, the United Nations, and three-quarters of the culture. Feminism wields enormous power, you see, so it plays in a whole different league. So I never get any feminist missionaries on my doorstep. But if I did, I would regard them no differently than I regard any other proselytizing belief system. I would consider myself unbound by any obligation to listen, or to engage their narrative whatsoever.

Come to think of it, that is how I view feminism at all events, whether it literally shows up on my doorstep or otherwise. It is only a competitor in the marketplace of ideas, whose wares I am not obligated to buy. And that ends the whole conversation, right there!

But if feminist missionaries literally showed up on my doorstep, I would send them packing very rudely indeed.

Or then again, maybe not. Maybe I would invite them in and converse with them, in order to study them as I would study any other enemy. 

And when I finally got tired of this, and decided that I'd heard enough . . . . then I would spring my rude surprise.

Saturday, April 21, 2012

The Brief Against VAWA, Briefly Stated

If a man beats the tar out of his wife at home, he has committed the crime of battery. If the same man beats the tar out of another man in a bar, then again he has committed the crime of battery. He has committed the identical crime in either case, and the eye of the law should be blind to all distinction.

Thursday, April 19, 2012

New Video -- Message to Non-Feminist Women - Part 2

Wednesday, April 18, 2012

Rape Hysteria is a Social Cancer, and Feminism is Responsible

Part two of the previous video is still in the works. But I must feed the snapping piranhas (a.k.a. readers), so I will re-post this earlier video about rape.

Most talk about RAPE misses the point that rape is the least prosecutable of crimes. There is no way to punish more rapists without destroying more innocent men in the process. There is no "solution" to rape.

The text version of this video is posted at 'A Voice for Men':

Interesting, isn't it, that the Southern Poverty Law Center seems to think it is okay for women to destroy innocent men with false accusations of rape? I mean, they evidently don't approve when somebody like the False Rape Society tries to raise public awareness about such things. Clearly, the Southern Poverty Law Center considers it hate speech to raise public awareness about such things.

And it's pretty clear that David Futrelle, the male feminist who calls himself  "Manboobz", also thinks it is okay-fine for innocent men to get destroyed by false accusations. Otherwise, why does he place the False Rape Society on his "boob roll" list? He evidently frowns upon the work which the FRS is doing. So it sounds like he wants women to go right on making false accusations against innocent men. Evidently, Davy Dumpling figures that's okay. No doubt, he reckons it will never happen to sycophantic little toads like himself. More than likely, Davy believes that such a fate could only befall "MRAs" or so-called "misogynists" or people like that -- you know, people of a sociocultural tribe different from his own. And of course their lives don't count anyway, since they're the ones slated to be thrown under the bus in the new feminist order.

But hey, if Davy got falsely accused and sent to prison, and had the customary adventures there, then I'm sure he he'd be okay-fine about it and wouldn't take it personally. Why, it is even possible that he'd benefit from the experience.

But I'm sure none of his feminist friends will send him down any such road, since he is more use to them while unincarcerated.

Thursday, April 12, 2012

New Video - Message to Non-Feminist Women -- Part One

Here is my latest YouTube video, based on a post from two years ago. Due to the length of the material, I will split this into two parts. Part one follows:

Below, I share the infamous Dear Woman video. I have paired that unctuous garbage with my darkside material because the two of them make such a piquant and, I hope, instructive, study in contrast. Try listening to both videos at once, in your headphones:

Yup. Basically, that's the idea. We must jam their signal. And in order to do THAT, we must boost our transmission strength by boosting our numbers. Just as importantly, we must have a care about our "programming".

To non-feminist men and women everywhere on earth, I send greetings of solidarity.

Wednesday, April 11, 2012

Misandry? We Got Your Misandry, Step Right Up!

I blame feminism for this, of course. Feminism grows fat on these kinds of lies. In fact, feminism would expire if the truth ever got out, and that is why most feminists pretend they have never heard about these things.

Feminism will be held to a stern accounting for its grievous transgressions. Hiss all you like, but it's a-coming.

To non-feminist men and women everywhere on earth, I send greetings of solidarity.

Tuesday, April 10, 2012

Good Reading From Brazil

I keep my eye on things globally, because, after all, the non-feminist revolution is happening globally. Here is something useful and entertaining, translated from the Portugese courtesy of Google Translator. It takes in a broader range than feminism -- actually, it is about "political correctness" and the PC method of argument. It is stingingly titled "How to Act Like a Perfect Idiot and Still Say You're Right:

How to Act Like a Perfect Idiot and Still Say You're Right

But this will sound familiar to us all, for it describes feminist behavior to a T, doesn't it? We've all been there.

By the way, Brazil has a lively and growing pro-male community. I thought it would encourage you to know that.

Thursday, April 05, 2012

Proof That Fidelbogen is a Criminal

know a certain Carmen Miranda feminist who carries a head-full of fruit, and I've been tossing limes and pomegranates back and forth with this person. Yes, yes, we all know that argument with these people is, well . . . fruitless! So that is why I do not argue with them. I might appear to be doing so, but in fact I am only engaging them -- which is not at all the same thing. For I happen to believe in the old adage of "know thine enemy", and although you can do this while merely observing thine enemy from a distance, an important dimension of knowledge will escape you if you neglect the "hands on" aspect of learning. 

So that is why you will sometimes find me dancing round and round the mulberry bush with feminist twits, nitwits, half-wits and fruitcakes -- even when comrades say, "Fidelbogen, you are wasting your time arguing with these people." My response is twofold: 1.), that I am not truly "arguing" with them, but rather studying them, and 2.), that I am showing them up for the benefit of non-feminists who are not quite activated yet, but leaning in that direction.

Yes, I am both studying the enemy, and making the enemy play the fool in the eyes of a candid world. But in particular, I am mapping their mental weak points so I will know how more efficiently to block and dismantle their game. For when you learn such things one-on-one, you garner valuable insight toward blocking and dismantling feminism as a whole. Such, at any rate, has been the fruit of my own effort.

I recently got a long-ish message from Carmen, as I will call her. I gather she is from Alberta, and is involved in the domestic violence industry there. I think you will be entertained by her mental gymnastics as she tries to conceal, from herself and others, her hatred of non-feminist men and women. With typos verbatim, here it is:
"The men's support groups are often involved in organized crime and are criminals. I would guess that you are promoting human trafficking and child porn. That is waht Men's groups faking their own abuse or acting as pretended under-dogs do.  
"The MEN's GROUPS here are involved in the child sex trade and child porn. They are supported by hookers which have inflitrated the services. You appear to like only filthy hookers and those who have the attitude of woman hate which is common to hookers and child sex trafficking women.  
"I understand that you are making efforts to spread the hatred of women and their degradation world wide. I can see that you want decent people to get out of the way and that the scum who support you oftenb make efforst to terrorize women who disagree. This is simply an exercise in bringing them out. There is no conspiracy against men. There is however an organized crime child sex sales and hooker sales conspiracy in which women bacl;ked by scum are taking over the management of the child porn industry. I would giuess that this is your goal as it is the only goal of faking that women have even achieved equality let alone abuse men.  
"Nowhere have I seen any evidence that women have equal rights in the USA or anywhere else. I do see that many women support sex trade operations against their gender for the enrichment of their male handlers and owners. 
"You are obviously a CRIMINAL. 
Now, to be completely fair and honest, I must admit this isn't quite so bananas as it might first appear-- although it is still quite bananas. You see, I know what brought this on, or at least I think I do. I am pretty sure, based on contextual evidence, that Carmen was "triggered" by my most recent YouTube video, the one about feminism's diseased underbelly.

Carmen's mind, which had somewhat settled after our previous exchanges, now went into reactive overdrive. My brief against feminism, based on the Agent Orange files, drove her to compose a counterpart story about a global conspiracy of so-called "men's groups" involved in sex trafficking and child pornography. Feminists are nothing if not wildly imaginative, and Carmen is obsessed with these issues in particular. You have just read her narrative, which was a way of pushing back. The trouble is that she was working in haste, so she did this poorly. Her analysis is slipshod, as hasty things will be, and is very unlike our own counter-feminist analysis, which has ripened for years.

And a touch of irony, like a twist of lemon peel, sits on top of all this. In a separate statement, Carmen replies to a quip which I'd stolen from Henny Youngman:
"Folksey charm. Fidelbogen you are delightful sometimes. Too bad about the woman hate thing."
Once again I must be honest, for my outlook on women is one of finely honed objectivity. I prefer not to have any illusions about women, so I don't sugar-glaze them any more than I'd sugar-glaze the rest of reality. Likewise, I can't be bothered to hate women any more than to hate the world at large. You see, hate is an energy sink, and I try not to sink my energy. Further, I consider it below my station as a philosopher to bestow that level of emotional engagement upon either women or the world. Finally, as a pragmatic counter-feminist strategist and policy wonk, I cannot let primitive feelings cloud my lens and compromise my clear view of the field. The way I see it, hating women gets in the way of attacking feminism intelligently.

You may gather from the foregoing that I have no truck with the pro-feminist men's movement or any of their brown-nosing affiliates. Given that I am not sycophantic or servile toward Ms.Muffet, that stands to reason, don't you think so? But just for the record, I get along with women rather well. Forgive me, but I'm a charmer, and women of all ages take a shine to me.

And do I try to be charming? Not on your life! Fact is, I'm just lazy, so I'm doing what comes easy. I'd sooner spare myself the work of being uncharming -- although I grant you there is a time and place for everything.

But the matter at hand is political, not personal, so enough about me.

I address my further remarks to non-feminist men and women who have drifted in here, likely upon the rising tide of curiosity about the so-called "men's movement".  There is, of course, no such movement -- and the expression itself is best understood as a figure of speech. We non-feminists, in fact, play a much larger game -- a game in which pro-male politics has a vital part, but not the only part. 

I hope you have gotten some insight from the railings of our delusional feminist. The insight which I hope you've gotten, is insight about feminism specifically, and not about the objective state of the world. Feminists, you see, are the worst of all people to talk to if you wish to understand the objective state of the world.  In the present case, our feminist has woven a story involving both women and men, and she does this in a manner which I can only describe as a projection of feminist guilt. So let us not be drawn into the trap of seeing the world through feminist eyes and mistaking this for objective reality.

My good non-feminist reader, that is you she is talking about! And whether you're a woman or a man, she has found a special place for you in her demonological narrative. But ask yourself something: are you personally a sex trafficker? Are you personally a child pornographer? No, I didn't think so! And are you personally enabling such people, or working in their service? No, I didn't think so!

And I, the present writer, am likewise none of those suggested things. 

Now, I realize that not many feminists are involved in sex trafficking or child pornography. That is not the guilt they are projecting. No, what they are projecting is guilt in the abstract. They just want to make somebody else the guilty party, and any old guilt will do, just so the spotlight doesn't fall upon feminism. That is what we see in the present case. That is what we also see  clear across the board, among a  range of feminists who mightn't appear nearly so fruity as our friend Carmen. They are ALL projecting. They are ALL deflecting guilt, of one kind or another, onto other people -- and onto their enemies especially. 

And so when Carmen heard my video, she felt driven to construct a crudely similar conspiracy narrative as a shield against it -- a spur-of-the-moment "back atcha". But this lacked the elegance, the intellectual tradition, the years of study and refinement which informed the narrative in the video. Carmen's reactive narrative, scribbled in haste, was the childish and delusional product of a childish and delusional mind. 

Now that the non-feminist revolution is swelling into a global phenomenon, with its numbers increasing daily, you will find virtually ALL feminists clinging to a similar set of security blankets.  For surely, when the world drives you into a corner with the twin devils of fear and guilt as your companions, you must cling to anything at all which affords comfort, yes?  I am right glad, therefore, to have better companions than those twin devils. Nowadays I travel light, with a mind that is free and clear.

And to non-feminist men and women everywhere on earth, I send greetings of solidarity!

It's All Theirs, and It's All Yours

Take this, and stick it all over the landscape, all over the cyberscape, and so on. Nothing beats a meme whose time has come. It oozes. It drips. It needs to be oozing and dripping in countries all over the world, and we have people all over the world who can make that happen. Really, it speaks for itself. It demands no explanation. Welcome to the age of post-argumentalism, friends! Res ispa loquitur!

Tuesday, April 03, 2012


Tranquil and dreamlike. Feels like an overcast day at the tail-end of winter when most of the snow has melted. Add a touch of filtered sunlight on distant grey hills.
Update: No, I was wrong. Upon further listening, I realize that the mood is autumnal and retrospective. It is not the end of winter at all, but the beginning. Likely, the day before the first snow.