Conversation With an Educated Female Moron
In the following screen captures, you will see a bit of conversation I had with a "liberal" Canadian woman who goes by the name of EmilyOne -- who evidently thinks it is fine to shit on economically dispossessed working men, and to rekindle the spirit of old-school class war. This dialogue illustrates the style of engagement that we ought to use with these people, and I share these samples for the edification of all disciples and proselytes who wish to learn from the master -- viz; ME! As usual, click to enlarge:
You know what, EmilyOne? Economically dispossessed working-class people, especially the male kind, have every right to hate your filthy, left-wing progressive bourgeois feminist guts -- just as a Jew would hate a Nazi! I could not, in good conscience, fault them for this. Somebody must force you to eat your own shit, so that you will know exactly what it tastes like. Not as good as you think.
Labels: CF Memory Lane
posted by Fidelbogen at 4:48 PM
5 Comments:
The amusing thing about discussing things with women like that, is that sooner or later they will degenerate into hysterical babbling. I've made them do it with one sentence.
Emily-lunchpail is a smug hallucinator. Her pleasure is all hers. No doubt she elicits chuckles from those who endure her physical presence.
She's a pseudo-intellectual, (barely), she believes there is a direct correlation, between post-secondary education and innate intellect. Which is amusing, considering the high number of academics from which I have heard very disciplined and eloquent discourses, which in the end, signified nothing except, their own biases. There are a lot of women like her, when they are younger, they state silly things like: "I need my man to be intelligent, therefore I won't date anyone who doesn't have a degree". I guess being pseudo-intellectual themselves, means they are also fooled by other pseudo-intellectual's and perceive rhetorical posturing and eloquence, as equivalent to actual understanding. Which says a great deal about them, when you think about it. Does it not?
This Emily-S**t-for-brains obviously thinks she witty, smart and desirable, and that her cotton-candy degree (if she actually has one) is worth more than what she splurged on it. I wouldn't even bother with creatures like her.
I especially enjoyed her amoral empathy apartheid when Fidelbogen called her commentary vile. She has this neat little taxonomy of the Righteous on the one hand, bad treatment of whom can properly be called vile, and then the Evil Ones on the other side, bad treatment of whom is not to be criticized.
She is basically either a sociopath or is "performing" sociopathy.
Post a Comment
<< Home